Not that I disagree but could you provide examples of how they may have done that? It could quickly render the executive branch quite impotent. I think there are also dangerous actions by the Executive branch not fulfilling its duties by executing the laws of the US. They should not be allowed other than based on financial ability just pick and chose which laws it wishes to enforce.
"The US Constitution doesn't explicitly mention "executive orders," but it grants the president inherent powers, particularly through Article II, Section 1, which vests the executive power in the president. This general authority is what enables presidents to issue executive orders. Executive orders are used to direct federal agencies on how to implement laws or to take specific actions, and they are often based on the president's constitutional duty to "take care that the Laws be faithfully executed"
By
Highmark ·
