Democrats say Trump’s trade deals were corrupt.
Democrats know they can’t repeal President Donald Trump’s tariffs as long as he’s in the White House. But if they win control of Congress, they plan to haul in top administration officials and possibly executives to explain how Trump picked his targets in his trade war — and why he gave others a pass.
With midterm elections less than a month out, Democratic lawmakers and aides on the House Ways and Means, House Foreign Affairs and Senate Finance Committees are preparing a big oversight push on Trump’s trade policies, especially suspected quid pro quos that may have benefited wealthy interests and foreign governments.
Heading into November, Democrats have bet that an anti-corruption pitch will resonate with voters as they look to contrast Trump’s dealings with Americans’ cost-of-living concerns. Making good on that message is poised to create an uncomfortable few years not just for the president and his top economic officials but also for corporate executives and foreign leaders who’ve sought to shape the president’s trade decisions through favor and flattery.
“The American people have had enough of failed Republican policies that have delivered them nothing but higher costs and less opportunity while Trump’s family and friends get richer than ever off their backs,” Rep. Richard Neal, the Massachusetts Democrat poised to chair House Ways and Means, said in a statement. “Democrats are fighting to change course and deliver an agenda that brings families back from the breaking point and ends Trump’s grift.”
The White House is accusing Democrats of going after the president because they have no trade policy of their own.
“The Democrats are already telegraphing that, once again, they have no agenda to improve the lives of Americans and will instead continue their decade-long obsession with investigating President Trump,” said Taylor Rogers, a White House spokeswoman. “The President negotiated nearly 20 trade deals that have totally reshaped the international economic order to reduce our trade deficit, revitalize American manufacturing, reestablish fair trading practices and level the playing field for American workers. President Trump has always put America First; the Democrats continue to put America last.”
According to seven lawmakers, congressional staffers and former trade officials, Democrats plan to demand answers on who in the administration was responsible for selecting targets for tariff relief, foreign investments and foreign deals on critical mineral supplies and semiconductor sales — and the criteria they used. Lawmakers also plan to zoom in on which companies stood to benefit from specific trade and investments deals, and whether put their finger on the scales.
There are also more process-oriented questions that need answering, said a second Democratic aide granted anonymity to discuss the planning. They include whether the many tariff-lowering trade deals Trump has announced on social media have been committed to text or amount to handshake agreements. A third Democratic aide described the deals as glorified press releases.
The administration has given inconsistent descriptions of many of the deals, and in some cases it’s been unclear if the foreign government involved is even on the same page.
The administration’s critical minerals deals are set to come under particularly intense scrutiny, according to the Democratic aides. China currently has a near-monopoly on the supply chains for those materials, which are crucial components in consumer technology, clean energy machinery and defense equipment, and The Trump administration has been racing to develop alternative supply chains to reduce its reliance on Beijing.
Officials at the Departments of Defense, State, Commerce and the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative have announced memoranda of understanding to cooperate on and invest in critical mineral extraction with countries like Morocco, Peru and Chile, but they have yet to make the text of those MOUs public. Several of Trump’s so-called “reciprocal” trade deals, including both the Indonesia and Malaysia deals, also tie tariff relief to U.S. access to minerals.
“These secretive deals were concluded without meaningful congressional input or public scrutiny,” the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen complained in an August report.
Businesses would welcome attempts by Democrats to expand oversight of the tariff exemption processes and discourage ad-hoc relief, said a former USTR official now working in the private sector granted anonymity because they are not authorized to speak to the media.
But the former official said that the main thing most U.S. companies crave is tariff stability, which is unlikely while Trump remains in the Oval Office.
“I’m not sure that” Democrats taking Congress “completely wins the day for them,” the person said.
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/10/13/trump-trade-tariffs-democrats-congress-01115289
By
Crnr2Crnr ·
