Leaderboard

My new whip scared you all the way to Asia last winter you butter filled bitch.

Been a productive couple weeks. Everything is framed up and windows and doors are in. All of the insulation I'm putting in is done and the spray foamer is coming Saturday to do his thing. Boiler is running and working well now after a 2 day clusterfuck. My blood pressure must have been 200/145 for two days straight.

Designs a stupid bet scenario. Scoffs when guys want to bet him one on one. Calls everyone a pussy. Seems legit.

You are one dumb cunt. That is a fact that everyone can agree on.

Here's the winner!

Aaaahhhhhhh. 74 in a 35.....on rear wheel. Blew a 2.6. BAM! Good times!

Hey MC, is there a photo of this bill board up,...I clicked the link and it's really just a meme with some talk..Are you sure it's an actual bill board and it's up?? Just didn't want you to accidentally get gut hooked with fake news.........for the 3007th time..

Yep. Humans are the problem! But not me, or my propane furnace!! Can't make this shit up. How fucking stupid!!

My god you are a complete retard.

Time person of the year should have went to the people of Honk Kong fighting for their freedom not some well do do white girl being used for propaganda for a cause that doesn't exist.

Yet you still buy gasoline, fly in planes, sail on ships, buy things made of plastic. Why are you such a hypocrite?

They have Morrison fooled. He’s pretty dumb.

but won't. Next.

Barb is such an insufferable shit stain desperately seeking attention. The most pathetic person here and this place is full of characters!

I'm glad we finally smarten up up here. They've put the vents back on, thankfully.

We'll worry about that, you worry about these guys...

Fuck. They asked her questions at a conference. She looked like a deer in the headlights! A revkev retard!!

They have been proven wrong. Why is the earth 2° cooler than 8000 years ago? Caveman Cars? Man made cooling? Explain

but its not centered with the beam above, too close to the couch, please move it 1 more time lol

After moving it about 5 fucking different times, she FINALLY picked a spot. @Kivalo

The Incredible Shrinking Impeachment The Democratic grounds for ousting Trump are weak—and damaging to constitutional norms. By The Editorial Board Dec. 11, 2019 7:15 pm ET Opinion: Democrats Shrink Impeachment to Two Weak Articles YOU MAY ALSO LIKE UP NEXT 0:00 / 1:33 Opinion: Democrats Shrink Impeachment to Two Weak Articles Bribery, extortion and other claims vanish as Democrats narrow their articles of impeachment and include no violations of law. Image: J. Scott Applewhite/AP So that’s it? That’s all there is? After all the talk of obstruction of justice, collusion with Russia, bribery, extortion, profiting from the Presidency, and more, House Democrats have reduced their articles of impeachment against President Trump to two: abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. Honey, we shrunk the impeachment. Democrats on the Judiciary Committee will vote as early as Thursday on the text of the two articles they unveiled Tuesday, and then they will rush it to the floor next week. It’s enough to suspect that Democrats understand they are offering the weakest case for impeachment since Andrew Johnson, that the public isn’t convinced, and so they simply want to get it over with. *** At least Johnson was impeached for violating a specific statute, the Tenure of Office Act, by firing Edwin Stanton as Secretary of War. There was wide agreement that Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton violated criminal statutes. In this case Democrats don’t even try to allege a criminal act. Democrats Shrink Their Case For Impeachment 00:00 / 23:59 SUBSCRIBE Whatever happened to bribery and extortion? Democrats spent weeks talking them up as the crimes of Mr. Trump’s Ukraine interventions. They had turned to those words after focus groups with voters found them more compelling than “quid pro quo.” Yet suddenly they’re gone. Have Democrats concluded that Mr. Trump’s actions aren’t illegal under statutes that have specific meaning? Democrats have retreated instead to charge “abuse of power,” a phrase general enough for anything Congress wants to stuff into it. They don’t even pretend any more to prove a quid pro quo. Instead they assert that Mr. Trump, in his phone call with Ukraine’s president, “solicited the interference of a foreign government” in the 2020 election “in pursuit of personal political benefit.” They also assert that this “compromised the national security of the United States and undermined the integrity of the United States democratic process.” Their problem is that Mr. Trump didn’t withhold military aid to Ukraine, and even if he had he would have merely been returning to Barack Obama’s policy of denying lethal aid. How would that have jeopardized national security? Every President also solicits actions from foreign leaders that he hopes will help him politically at home. We don’t condone Mr. Trump’s mention of Joe Biden in his call to Ukraine’s President, which was far from perfect and reflects his often bad judgment. But “abuse of power” on this evidence is a new and low standard for impeachment that will come back to haunt future Presidents of all parties. As for corrupting the 2020 election, even if Ukraine had announced an investigation into Joe and Hunter Biden, Mr. Trump couldn’t know how effective it would be, how long it would take, or whether it might even exonerate them. The election is still a year away. If the mere announcement of a foreign government’s investigation into corruption can poison a U.S. election, then American democracy must be weaker than even its enemies think. The second Democratic article is weaker in that it amounts to impeaching Mr. Trump because he is resisting their subpoenas. “Without lawful cause or excuse, President Trump directed Executive Branch agencies, offices and officials not to comply with those subpoenas,” the article charges. His lawful cause is defending his presidential powers under the Constitution. Every modern President has to some extent or another resisted Congressional or special-counsel subpoenas. Nixon and Mr. Clinton did until they lost at the Supreme Court. House Democrats are refusing even to fight in court, claiming impeachment gives them plenary power to see all documents and any witnesses they want. This ignores that the Constitution stipulates co-equal branches that each have the right to defend their powers. If Democrats are right in their claim, then every President essentially works for Congress. We should skip elections and let Congress choose the President. Democrats also claim the emergency of time, and as usual Rep. Adam Schiff puts this case in the least credible way. “The argument ‘why don’t you just wait?’ amounts to this: Why don’t you just let [Mr. Trump] cheat in one more election? Why not let him cheat just one more time?,” Mr. Schiff told the press as the articles were unveiled. But Mr. Trump didn’t cheat to win in 2016, as Robert Mueller’s Russia collusion investigation demonstrated after two years of looking. As for 2020, the Constitution includes no clause for pre-emptive impeachment to prevent acts that a President might commit. *** Democrats wrap these charges in high-toned rhetoric about “this solemn day” and quotes from Benjamin Franklin. But they are essentially impeaching Mr. Trump because they despise him and the way he governs. This is the classic standard of “maladministration,” which the Founders explicitly considered but excluded from the Constitution as grounds for impeachment. They did so because they feared that partisan Congresses would too easily impeach Presidents of the opposite political faction on this subjective basis, rather than for serious offenses. In their wisdom, the American people seem to have figured all this out. Despite one-sided lobbying by the impeachment press, the polls show that a majority opposes removing Mr. Trump from office. This may be the real explanation behind the Democratic move to shrink impeachment. Democrats now want a fast and furious vote to satisfy their most anti-Trump partisans, dump the mess on the Senate, and campaign on something else. They shouldn’t get off that easy. By defining impeachment down, they are turning what should be a rare and extraordinary constitutional remedy into a routine tool of partisan warfare. They are harming constitutional norms, as the liberals like to say. Americans will decide in 11 months whether Mr. Trump deserves to remain in office. But they should also keep the impeachment vote very much in mind when they decide whether Democrats deserve to keep the House. Copyright ©2019 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Well compared to barb... maybe she is

They’re just making shit up now

Poor Iceman. Can we trade MC and BarbieBackPeddler for his return tho? Asking for a friend.

Well his prescribed rate loan needs to be paid back, so there's that.

Who is?

Nailed it. Nobody is getting indicted. Trump isn’t going to be removed. Just the same, accept what we have as a corrupt governance or be done with it. There’s only one way I see this getting “fixed” and I don’t care how absurd it sounds to many. We are at the brink of absolute idiocy brought to us by idiots in our capital and the millions of lemmings that follow their daily talking points.

These are the only ones I’ll buy anymore. And I also have a couple of old style ones around.

Well, the newly EPA approved gas cans with these new fangled no leak but does leak Obama-nozzles definately forces a body to try and overcome and adapt, but grocery bags?

Fucking awesome. Lol #endthread!

“Time to act” What are you doing? Let me guess, you use a cutesy recycle bin you put out by the curb once a week? Lying fraud.

No she's not, she's being spoon fed her narrative. Left alone to speak off the cuff and she sounds dumber than you. She's a pawn and nothing more.

You mean 90% of the "FUNDED" scientists.