J. Jackson Posted October 5, 2023 Share Posted October 5, 2023 (edited) 17 minutes ago, ZR6000RR said: Common knowledge has nothing to do with truth. If it was, every one would be calling you interject jESUS. The most false profit since the Waco fiasco. Here's a tip for you, spell check could be your friend. Edited October 5, 2023 by J. Jackson 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not greg b Posted October 5, 2023 Share Posted October 5, 2023 https://www.snowtechmagazine.com/2016-yamaha-1049cc-engine/ All the changes to the motor. There are million threads on ty and snow west about the bottom ends not holding up to boost from back then. They all wanted the older engine because of it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racinfarmer Posted October 5, 2023 Share Posted October 5, 2023 6 minutes ago, Not greg b said: https://www.snowtechmagazine.com/2016-yamaha-1049cc-engine/ All the changes to the motor. There are million threads on ty and snow west about the bottom ends not holding up to boost from back then. They all wanted the older engine because of it. The Yamaha racers had to limit the rippems they'd turn on their ice sleds. Forget what it exactly it was, but they only dropped 2-300 to prevent unscheduled disassembles. Must have changed going from 15's to 16's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZR6000RR Posted October 5, 2023 Share Posted October 5, 2023 9 minutes ago, Not greg b said: https://www.snowtechmagazine.com/2016-yamaha-1049cc-engine/ All the changes to the motor. There are million threads on ty and snow west about the bottom ends not holding up to boost from back then. They all wanted the older engine because of it. Again, not proof. Just pure conjecture there, real Greg B. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not greg b Posted October 5, 2023 Share Posted October 5, 2023 8 minutes ago, ZR6000RR said: Again, not proof. Just pure conjecture there, real Greg B. I guess they issued a recall and quit selling the kit for no reason. The changed parts caused it. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simple Jim Posted October 5, 2023 Share Posted October 5, 2023 1 hour ago, ZR6000RR said: Sorry with my head this far up a raccoons ass I can’t see daylight yet my little wenis is hard cause there are multiple of them up my ass I can’t focus. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crnr2Crnr Posted October 5, 2023 Author Share Posted October 5, 2023 2 minutes ago, Simple Jim said: Wesley Selby used to race a 7000 that never blew up and a buddy of mine tried buying it but was denied due to goat raping accusations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted October 5, 2023 Share Posted October 5, 2023 6 hours ago, stinkipinki said: I've owned two ProCross sleds, a 2012 F800 and a 2014 Viper XTX (which I bought brand new BTW, came with an optional Turbo, fastest stock sled in 14 was a Viper with a Turbo). The f800 I owned for several years and put 4500 miles on. And they were such pieces of crap you now own a Poo and are shopping for a Doo. We get it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 5, 2023 Share Posted October 5, 2023 5 hours ago, stinkipinki said: 14/15, not sure about 16. Kit was about $2800, Mistubishi built, So not factory stock which is what stock means. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 5, 2023 Share Posted October 5, 2023 4 hours ago, stinkipinki said: To this day a RIOT kit Zuke 800 ProCross will run with, if not beat, any new stock 850. They are making around 175HP. no they wouldn't. Not even close, like not even in the same league. A Boost is a new stock sled and there is not an 800 Cat in the world that would beat them unless both were dropped from an airplane. Only then does the cat have a chance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted October 5, 2023 Share Posted October 5, 2023 The landing would be rough Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not greg b Posted October 5, 2023 Share Posted October 5, 2023 15 minutes ago, HSR said: So not factory stock which is what stock means. It was sold as an accessory at Sno check time through and warrantied by Yamaha and it did not go well. The mpi kit was rock solid for years on the old configuration of the engine (the nytro). It was never an option for the 7000 as cat had the 1100 turbo so it would have been pointless to offer it for cat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZR6000RR Posted October 5, 2023 Share Posted October 5, 2023 4 hours ago, Not greg b said: I guess they issued a recall and quit selling the kit for no reason. The changed parts caused it. Wrong motor. That is the Viper engine. Definitely not proof. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not greg b Posted October 5, 2023 Share Posted October 5, 2023 (edited) 11 hours ago, ZR6000RR said: Wrong motor. That is the Viper engine. Definitely not proof. You obviously can’t read Edited October 5, 2023 by Not greg b 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tripleflipper Posted October 5, 2023 Share Posted October 5, 2023 14 hours ago, stinkipinki said: I've owned two ProCross sleds, a 2012 F800 and a 2014 Viper XTX (which I bought brand new BTW, came with an optional Turbo, fastest stock sled in 14 was a Viper with a Turbo). The f800 I owned for several years and put 4500 miles on. Your just a little butthurt forum bitch with nothing to post but my previous comments, which I stand on 100%. Go fill diapers somewhere else. If you got a week ban for every Cat thread you posted hateful garbage in or trolled in, we would never hear from you, cause thats all you do on this forum....is bitch like a woman... Are you on your period 24/7/365? And you forgot to say that both your ProCross sleds were every bit as good as a McLaren or Bugatti. Thank you Deephaven for re-posting the car comparison comments, gave me a good laugh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tripleflipper Posted October 5, 2023 Share Posted October 5, 2023 8 hours ago, Deephaven said: The landing would be rough Not on a ProCross, bestest sled out there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stinkipinki Posted October 5, 2023 Share Posted October 5, 2023 25 minutes ago, Tripleflipper said: And you forgot to say that both your ProCross sleds were every bit as good as a McLaren or Bugatti. Thank you Deephaven for re-posting the car comparison comments, gave me a good laugh Those comments were 100% correct and destroy the lame sales numbers argument. Ford sells alot of cars, Bugatti doesnt, but make a far superior performance machine. Kind of like the 998 just absolutely destroying the field so badly for so many years it was literally in a class by itself.. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stinkipinki Posted October 5, 2023 Share Posted October 5, 2023 The Boost/ Mach Z top out at 220ish HP, when the 7 year old 998 runs 350HP setups for 10k miles snd they still run good. 998 is still king of the land, but hey, nice gsuge. Ohh wait Cats got the best gauge now. Damnit 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tripleflipper Posted October 5, 2023 Share Posted October 5, 2023 6 minutes ago, stinkipinki said: Those comments were 100% correct and destroy the lame sales numbers argument. Ford sells alot of cars, Bugatti doesnt, but make a far superior performance machine. Kind of like the 998 just absolutely destroying the field so badly for so many years it was literally in a class by itself.. Unfortunately Cat is far from superior to any other sled out there and they have little in the way of sales numbers. An will have even less when Yamaha stops becoming their number one customer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stinkipinki Posted October 5, 2023 Share Posted October 5, 2023 (edited) - Edited October 5, 2023 by stinkipinki Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stinkipinki Posted October 5, 2023 Share Posted October 5, 2023 (edited) How about them sales numbers? Maybe we should run them all at 300HP just to see what happens... Ohhh right, the Polaris and Ski-Doo will fucking explode and can't even run past 220HP. Damn it. Atleast Polaris and Ski-Doo got the best handling chassis right? Ohh wait, they don't anymore. Atleast Polaris and Ski-Doo are still top notch...ohh wait they still run a chaincase. Atleast Polaris and Ski-Doo are cutting edge...ohh wait the Polaris chassis is 8 years old going on 9, and Doo's G5 is just a tweaked G5, so thats 7 years old going on 8. Atleast Polaris and Ski-Doo are well made...oh wait Polaris has re-called every sled they've made for the past 7 years, and just recalled over 11,000 Boost's with over 13 verified leaks. Sales numbers! Ohh wait Cat sold out online in a few hours! Damn it! Edited October 5, 2023 by stinkipinki Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. Jackson Posted October 5, 2023 Share Posted October 5, 2023 IDK but I've heard that sales numbers are kinda important in publically owned companies. In order to satisfy stockholders more sales generally equate to increased profits which translate into dividends. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
airflite1 Posted October 5, 2023 Share Posted October 5, 2023 1 hour ago, stinkipinki said: Those comments were 100% correct and destroy the lame sales numbers argument. Ford sells alot of cars, Bugatti doesnt, but make a far superior performance machine. Kind of like the 998 just absolutely destroying the field so badly for so many years it was literally in a class by itself.. If Cat compares to Bugatti, or the exotics in the car world then why don't they just raise their price accordingly and become profitable? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p51mstg Posted October 5, 2023 Share Posted October 5, 2023 36 minutes ago, J. Jackson said: IDK but I've heard that sales numbers are kinda important in publically owned companies. In order to satisfy stockholders more sales generally equate to increased profits which translate into dividends. Sales numbers are important for all companies. As for which sled hits the ground first when dropped from an airplane, I'm wondering about terminal velocity and aerodynamic drag. Wouldn't the ProCross actually fall slower? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stinkipinki Posted October 5, 2023 Share Posted October 5, 2023 1 hour ago, J. Jackson said: IDK but I've heard that sales numbers are kinda important Not for Bugatti or McLaren. They could give a flying fuck about sales. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.