Snoslinger Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 5 minutes ago, DriftBusta said: Right after you and Slinger post yours. BSEE Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 2 minutes ago, revkevsdi said: Pretty amazing that so many Americans still don't believe it is necessary to cut down pollution and throttle back on our use of fossil fuels. It's even more amazing that people question the science. Why the fuck would you believe someone paid by the oil company instead of Universities? Who is more likely to lie? For fuck sakes, that's as stupid as believing Donald Trump over the Head of the FBI. Or actually anyone with a pulse. Cuz universities hate research funding. Deplore it. Send it all back. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted June 2, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 2, 2017 The irrational logic that you need a degree in anything that you give your opinion on in here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 Just now, Snake said: Cuz universities hate research funding. Deplore it. Send it all back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Usedtoskidoo Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 2 minutes ago, revkevsdi said: Pretty amazing that so many Americans still don't believe it is necessary to cut down pollution and throttle back on our use of fossil fuels. It's even more amazing that people question the science. Why the fuck would you believe someone paid by the oil company instead of Universities? Who is more likely to lie? For fuck sakes, that's as stupid as believing Donald Trump over the Head of the FBI. Or actually anyone with a pulse. Its amazing that people think that sending 3 billion to China will miraculously end those harmful Co2 emissions. pssst. Co2 does not warm up the earth. It does grow trees however which should be good for us no? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 Just now, Skidooski said: The irrational logic that you need a degree in anything that you give your opinion on in here do you believe in mmgw? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted June 2, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 2, 2017 All you have to do is ask one simple question. Would climate change funding continue if they said man wasn't causing it to any alarming degree? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted June 2, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 2, 2017 8 minutes ago, DriftBusta said: Right after you and Slinger post yours. I believe in science - you don't 5 minutes ago, revkevsdi said: Pretty amazing that so many Americans still don't believe it is necessary to cut down pollution and throttle back on our use of fossil fuels. It's even more amazing that people question the science. Why the fuck would you believe someone paid by the oil company instead of Universities? Who is more likely to lie? For fuck sakes, that's as stupid as believing Donald Trump over the Head of the FBI. Or actually anyone with a pulse. Spot on Kev. But these guys watch and believe Faux Noise and Breitbsrt so who's surprised. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 2 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: do you believe in mmgw? Its not the primary driver. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DriftBusta Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 4 minutes ago, Snake said: Cuz universities hate research funding. Deplore it. Send it all back. They're not very good at dots, and connecting them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted June 2, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 2, 2017 Just now, SnowRider said: I believe in science - you don't Spot on Kev. But these guys watch and believe Faux Noise and Breitbsrt so who's surprised. You believe in science? Define "life?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DriftBusta Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 3 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: do you believe in mmgw? Localized, sure. Globalized? Nope. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DriftBusta Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 Just now, Highmark said: You believe in science? Define "life?" I bet that will go right over his pointy head. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 3 minutes ago, Snake said: Cuz universities hate research funding. Deplore it. Send it all back. It's been widely reported that our university system is admonishing those that say anything different than what the liberal agenda is for that reason. 1 minute ago, Highmark said: All you have to do is ask one simple question. Would climate change funding continue if they said man wasn't causing it to any alarming degree? Nope. And that is a FACT! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 3 minutes ago, SnowRider said: I believe in science - you don't Spot on Kev. But these guys watch and believe Faux Noise and Breitbsrt so who's surprised. until they manipulate the models to fit the outcome they want . and they have been busted doing so many many times . and that my friend not only hurts your cause but destroys any credibility Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted June 2, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 2, 2017 52 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: do you believe in mmgw? I believe humans have an impact yes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 1 hour ago, DriftBusta said: Localized, sure. Globalized? Nope. explain. do you think "local" gw just vanishes? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted June 2, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 2, 2017 3 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: explain. do you think "local" gw just vanishes? My explanation on it would be it can be warmer in cities because of the darker surfaces and buildings restrict air movement creating pockets of heat. Buildings and factories also emit heat. Urban Heat Island I think is the phrase they use. Is this a dramatic cause of climate change. Nope. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 1 minute ago, Highmark said: My explanation on it would be it can be warmer in cities because of the darker surfaces and buildings restrict air movement creating pockets of heat. Buildings and factories also emit heat. Urban Heat Island I think is the phrase they use. Is this a dramatic cause of climate change. Nope. yeah I don't think that's much of a cause either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted June 2, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 2, 2017 2 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: yeah I don't think that's much of a cause either. How come basically 100% of the discussions around CO2 revolves around reduction of emmitance and not increasing absorption? That alone show's me how political the debate is. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/531346/can-sucking-co2-out-of-the-atmosphere-really-work/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 9 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: yeah I don't think that's much of a cause either. When the temp monitors are there? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Usedtoskidoo Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 its called photosynthesis. works quite well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 26 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: yeah I don't think that's much of a cause either. What does Leo think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oleroule Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 4 hours ago, Skidooski said: So Germany, France and Italy say "Paris deal cannot be renegotiated"? If this is "so vital to our planet" then why shut the US out if they want to get back in at a later date with different terms? it's called 'having a hissy fit'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.