jtssrx Posted August 6, 2018 Share Posted August 6, 2018 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted August 6, 2018 Share Posted August 6, 2018 The guy is a crackpot. But that's not for "open" media to decide. This is 1st amendment rights infringment...just hung by a different nail by the left...as always. "....for the greater good." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted August 6, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 6, 2018 Seems fair and reasonable right? Silence him!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted August 6, 2018 Share Posted August 6, 2018 Talk about collusion four simultaneous bans all at the same time the guy has been doing the same stuff for years and all of a sudden he violates all their terms of service FUCKING CONSPIRACY Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted August 6, 2018 Author Share Posted August 6, 2018 1 minute ago, Momorider said: Talk about collusion four simultaneous bans all at the same time the guy has been doing the same stuff for years and all of a sudden he violates all their terms of service FUCKING CONSPIRACY Talk about collusion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEFF Posted August 6, 2018 Share Posted August 6, 2018 Good thing the liberals are so tolerant... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted August 6, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 6, 2018 The first doesn’t protect slander Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtnloverxtreme2 Posted August 6, 2018 Share Posted August 6, 2018 dont agree with it. its bullshit. the guy is a loon, (or is he, the loonier ones sre the idiots that take what he says as gospel, but...), but freedom of speech trumps all in my books. isis, nazis, liberals, what have you, they still deserve the right to say what they want Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted August 6, 2018 Share Posted August 6, 2018 12 minutes ago, mtnloverxtreme2 said: dont agree with it. its bullshit. the guy is a loon, (or is he, the loonier ones sre the idiots that take what he says as gospel, but...), but freedom of speech trumps all in my books. isis, nazis, liberals, what have you, they still deserve the right to say what they want Well Antifa, Farrakhan, Racist NYT editor etc.. are still on all those sites there is no double standard at all Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted August 6, 2018 Share Posted August 6, 2018 He’s a racist prick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted August 6, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 6, 2018 2 minutes ago, Mainecat said: He’s a racist prick. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted August 6, 2018 Author Share Posted August 6, 2018 18 minutes ago, Mainecat said: He’s a racist prick. you're the racist Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted August 6, 2018 Share Posted August 6, 2018 (edited) Facebook and Apple are owned entities. Freedom of speech doesn’t apply. My thoughts? What took em so long? He has plenty of other outlets to spew his nonsense. Edited August 6, 2018 by ActionfigureJoe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry ginger Posted August 6, 2018 Share Posted August 6, 2018 1 hour ago, jtssrx said: none of those companies owe anyone a stage to spout their beliefs and can feel free to ban them for any reason. create enough outrage by doing so it kills their business model and they suffer but they have that right. beauty of the web if no one wants to carry your shit you can put it somewhere else regardless if it's left or right wing drivel. Whats scary is the number of supposedly educated, fairly successful left and right wing whackos who eat up anything their side posts on the intrawebs 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member Kivalo Posted August 6, 2018 Gold Member Share Posted August 6, 2018 33 minutes ago, Mainecat said: He’s a racist prick. So are you. Tell us all how you feel about the chinks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted August 6, 2018 Share Posted August 6, 2018 1 hour ago, Zambroski said: The guy is a crackpot. But that's not for "open" media to decide. This is 1st amendment rights infringment...just hung by a different nail by the left...as always. "....for the greater good." Complete crackpot. Dont get me wrong he has a right to be a crack pot but his schtick is just ridiculous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSFB Posted August 6, 2018 Share Posted August 6, 2018 Wouldn't be surprised if one of Alex's followers goes off the deep end and shoots up a place as a result. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted August 6, 2018 Share Posted August 6, 2018 Just now, SSFB said: Wouldn't be surprised if one of Alex's followers goes off the deep end and shoots up a place as a result. Would he be considered a “patriot”? A hero defender of the constitution? No. Of course not. But really....why not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted August 6, 2018 Author Share Posted August 6, 2018 14 minutes ago, Angry ginger said: none of those companies owe anyone a stage to spout their beliefs and can feel free to ban them for any reason. create enough outrage by doing so it kills their business model and they suffer but they have that right. beauty of the web if no one wants to carry your shit you can put it somewhere else regardless if it's left or right wing drivel. Whats scary is the number of supposedly educated, fairly successful left and right wing whackos who eat up anything their side posts on the intrawebs I didn't claim they had to give anyone a platform Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSFB Posted August 6, 2018 Share Posted August 6, 2018 1 minute ago, Zambroski said: Would he be considered a “patriot”? A hero defender of the constitution? No. Of course not. But really....why not? Alex's constitutional rights haven't been infringed here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted August 6, 2018 Share Posted August 6, 2018 2 minutes ago, SSFB said: Alex's constitutional rights haven't been infringed here. We probably read the Constitution differently. At best this may be “gray” area because of free enterprise clauses but, It’s clear what this is and it’s clear who’s implementing it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSFB Posted August 6, 2018 Share Posted August 6, 2018 2 minutes ago, Zambroski said: We probably read the Constitution differently. At best this may be “gray” area because of free enterprise clauses but, It’s clear what this is and it’s clear who’s implementing it. No, it's pretty clear. The first amendment doesn't apply to interactions between citizens and corporations. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted August 6, 2018 Share Posted August 6, 2018 2 minutes ago, SSFB said: No, it's pretty clear. The first amendment doesn't apply to interactions between citizens and corporations. No, it doesnt. But this isn’t about that. This is about those corporation(s) squelching a persons rights to use their services like all others to convey his message using his free speech constitutional rights, and then squashing it because It doesn’t fit what they want to hear. Pretty simple really. I can give you a ton of analogies but, I don’t wanna. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member steve from amherst Posted August 6, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 6, 2018 1 hour ago, SnowRider said: The first doesn’t protect slander Or a private business , and they all are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XC.Morrison Posted August 6, 2018 Share Posted August 6, 2018 He doesn't even believe his own bullshit. He's playing a character that morons think is genuine and uses his web store to sell them supplements such as Alpha Power and Brain Force Plus. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4418934/Alex-Jones-s-lawyer-says-s-just-playing-character.html His remarks are also known for taking a turn for the violent when he covers liberal celebrities - including a promise to 'break' Alec Baldwin's neck and telling J-Lo to go to Somalia, where she will be 'gang-raped so fast it’ll make your head spin.' More recently, on March 30, he called Rep. Adam Schiff a 'c**ksucker' and a 'fairy' after Schiff, the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, called for an investigation into Trump's Russia ties. He then threatened to 'beat' Schiff's 'goddamn a**,' before paraphrasing John Wayne in True Grit: 'You got that you goddamn son of a b***h? Fill your hand.' All three of those instances were cited by Kelly Jones as reasons why her husband is 'not a stable person' who should be entrusted with their kids. She is especially concerned as the threats against Schiff could constitute a crime, she told the court. Threatening a government official can carry a maximum of 5-10 years in prison. But Jones's lawyer said that the claims aimed at his client were absurd - as ridiculous as judging Jack Nicholson's character based on his performance as the Joker in Tim Burton's 1989 Batman movie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.