Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

No Warming in U.S. for at Least 17 Years According to Rarely Referenced Urban Heat-Free Database


Recommended Posts

  • Platinum Contributing Member

:news:  If you remove the urban heat sink warming the US hasn't hardly warmed in the past 17 years meaning its not CO2.

https://dailysceptic.org/2022/07/30/no-warming-in-u-s-for-at-least-17-years-according-to-rarely-referenced-urban-heat-free-database/

There has been no temperature warming for at least 17 years across the United States, according to results from a rarely referenced dataset that was designed to remove all urban heat distortions. The dataset, compiled by the Natural Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in the U.S., shows oscillating temperature changes, but very little evidence to indicate a warming trend. In fact, the above graph clearly shows the United States to be cooler in May 2022 compared to May 2005.

The information is contained in the latest survey of all NOAA’s weather stations by the U.S. meteorologist Anthony Watts. The data is compiled from a select group of 114 stations across the country that have been specifically sited away from urban development. Called the U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN), NOAA started it in 2005 and noted that it was aiming for “superior accuracy and continuity in places that land use will not likely impact during the next five decades”. Representative pictures of the weather stations, as seen in this 2013 science paper, show there is no sign of any urban development. In his latest survey of U.S. “Corrupted Climate Stations”, Anthony Watts notes the existence of USCRN, adding: “It is free of localised heat biases by design, but the data it produces is never mentioned in monthly or yearly climate reports published by NOAA for public consumption.”

The USCRN disclosures are the latest evidence suggesting global warming started to run out of steam over 20 years ago. Local temperature measurements by the U.K. Met Office show that the average temperature across the U.K. fell to 9.17oC in the 2010s, compared to 9.31oC in the 2000s. Meanwhile, global datasets run by NOAA, the Met Office and NASA continue to show substantial warming since 2000, helped by regular ‘adjustments’ that mostly warm the recent record and depress earlier readings. As a result, surface global datasets show an increasing disconnect from accurate satellite and meteorological balloon records, both of which point to a lengthy pause from about 1998-2012, and a current one that has lasted almost eight years. The only significant temperature rise during this period occurred around 2016, and was caused by a powerful, and natural, El Nino oscillation.

State-funded weather services around the world have become increasing politicised in recent years, and they offer strong support for the command-and-control Net Zero project. With global warming currently dying on its feet, they have increasingly turned to the promotion of what used to called ‘bad’ weather, but has now been re-branded as ‘extreme’. Datasets that continue to show some warmth are used to proclaim records, and promote the political view that one-off events are caused by man-made climate change, i.e., burning fossil fuel. Having bet the ranch on global warming, any suggestion that the current warming phase, seen countless times in the paleoclimatic record, is pausing, or even stopping, is a major blow to the elite backers of the trillion-dollar Net Zero project. Without warming, the need for Net Zero, and the economic and societal devastation it will cause, disappears.

Specific mention of NOAA’s urban heatless data – showing the absence of domestic warming for at least 17 years – was missing from its recent 2021 climate report. North America was said to have had its seventh warmest year on record, with nine of the 10 warmest years having occurred since 2001.

These ‘official’ U.S. temperatures and records arise from a much larger set of weather stations across the country that have been criticised for incorporating massive heat inputs due to being sited in urban areas. Anthony Watts has drawn attention to this problem in the past. His latest nationwide study “follows up widespread corruption and heat biases found at NOAA stations in 2009, and the heat bias distortion problem is even worse now”.

Describing the U.S. surface temperature record as “fatally flawed”, Watts found about 96% of U.S. temperature stations failed to meet what NOAA itself considered to be acceptable and uncorrupted placement standards. Watts defines ‘corruption’ as caused by the localised effects of urbanisation, producing heat bias because of a close proximity to asphalt, machinery, and other heat-producing, heat-trapping, or heat-accentuating objects. According to Watts, data that had not been corrupted by faulty placement showed a rate of warming in the U.S. “reduced by almost a half compared to all stations”.

As we noted recently, atmospheric scientists Professors William Happer and Richard Lindzen are unimpressed with NOAA and NASA’s more conventional temperature collecting activities. They told a U.S. government inquiry that for several decades “NASA and NOAA have been fabricating temperature data to argue that rising CO2 levels have led to the hottest year on record”. They described what they identified as false and manipulated data as an “egregious violation of scientific method”.

Watts notes that the corruption of data “strongly undermines the legitimacy and the magnitude of the official consensus on long-term climate warming trends in the United States”.

Using urban heat-affected data is now a regular feature of reporting the so-called climate emergency by both the Met Office in the U.K. and the BBC. The four highest temperatures of around 40oC during the recent heatwave were claimed by three airports, including Heathrow, and a measuring device in Kew Gardens next to the giant 16,000 pane greenhouse, known as the Palm House. Within a few days, the BBC was reporting that a group called World Weather Attribution said the high temperatures were “basically impossible” without climate change. Dr. Friederike Otto of the green billionaire-funded Grantham Institute at Imperial College claimed the temperatures were up to 4oC higher as a result of human climate change.

The BBC did not query the near instant verdict, reporting that the academics had used “complex mathematical models” to come to their conclusion.

There is no scientific evidence that proves conclusively single event weather is related to humans changing the climate by burning fossil fuel. The heatwave in Britain, and parts of Europe, had a logical meteorological explanation that also saw below average temperatures on either side of the localised event. Such explanations for ‘extreme’ weather are little more than opinions, and, one can argue, highly political ones. And of course, the 4oC warming attributed to humans in the heatwave is around the figure often quoted for the contribution of urban heat.

Edited by Highmark
  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
28 minutes ago, spin_dry said:

I didn’t know that massively large cities were being built in the arctic. That explains the disappearance of old ice. 
 

 

And Antarctic ice is increasing.   Maybe the Inuit's are right and we simply have wobbled a bit.   

Thing with global climate is there are 1000's of inputs and to put blame on one gas that is such a small % of our atmosphere of which even a smaller percent is "man made" is faulty science at best.   

https://www.science.org/content/article/growing-underwater-heat-blob-speeds-demise-arctic-sea-ice

Edited by Highmark
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, spin_dry said:

didn’t know that massively large cities were being built in the arctic. That explains the disappearance of old ice.

How convincing!! A computer generated cartoon. :news:

https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/08/us/glaciers-national-park-2020-trnd/index.html#:~:text=(CNN) The signs at Glacier,spokeswoman Gina Kurzmen told CNN.

Climmmi.jpg

Edited by irv
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, the “ official “ measurements are taken at the air port which used to be out of town or at least on the edge of town. Now it’s been swallowed by the urban heat island. Gee whiz I wonder if that has any effect on their reported warming over the decades…

What gets me is every time there’s a cold snap the liberal fucktards have to point out condescendingly that there’s a difference between weather & climate. But every time there’s a heat wave guess what those same fuckers just have to bring up, they can’t help themselves.

Drought? must be global warming

Flood? must be global warming

Warmer than average? yep, global warming

Colder than average? You guessed it, that’s global warming to, oops, I mean “ climate change “

Funniest one lately is how they changed the requirements for naming storms. Now they give a whale fart out in the middle of the Atlantic a name just so they can say record number of hurricanes this year. Not getting the results you want? Just change the definition…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, spin_dry said:

I didn’t know that massively large cities were being built in the arctic. That explains the disappearance of old ice. 
 

 

Look south or is that one of those inconvenient truths? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ViperGTS/Z1 said:

Tell these UPS drivers its only urban heat sink..:lol:..maybe if we remove sensors from airports they may feel cooler:dunno:

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/investigations/sending-drivers-die-ups-workers-demand-heat-safety-record-temps-rcna40147

Screenshot_2022-08-03-21-29-24.png

Osha lmfao not at all a over the top over reactionary govenment shit stain . 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
7 hours ago, Ez ryder said:

Osha lmfao not at all a over the top over reactionary govenment shit stain . 

Wonder if China has their sensors in the wrong places to be recording all these records?

https://www.yahoo.com/news/china-warns-temperatures-rising-faster-045514345.html

 

Screenshot_2022-08-04-08-30-36.png

Edited by ViperGTS/Z1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, ViperGTS/Z1 said:

Wonder if China has their sensors in the wrong places to be recording all these records?

https://www.yahoo.com/news/china-warns-temperatures-rising-faster-045514345.html

 

Screenshot_2022-08-04-08-30-36.png

Highest since…. 1980??!!  So water levels have been there before??  FFS put down the YAHOO!!  
Oh, it was 99 in the Twin Cities today… in 1941!
😂😂😂

Edited by Mag6240
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
1 hour ago, ViperGTS/Z1 said:

Wonder if China has their sensors in the wrong places to be recording all these records?

https://www.yahoo.com/news/china-warns-temperatures-rising-faster-045514345.html

   

 

Screenshot_2022-08-04-08-30-36.png

Seriously you are going to believe China who is poised from EV and other renewables to financially take over the world.  :lol:  

Oh no costal water levels are the highest since 1980!   We are all going to die drowning.  :lol:  

Those damn 1930's. :lol:  Only 2 in the past 20 years and 1 in the past 10.  30+ states records are from prior to 1940.  

maptemps.JPG

Edited by Highmark
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...