Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

The gaping hole in Sean Hannity’s story about being Michael Cohen’s client


Recommended Posts

  • Platinum Contributing Member
18 minutes ago, DAVE said:

Some how she felt she was relevant.

She said she was there to support women like her and that they cant be bought...

I heard she gave a wicked bj to the highest bidder later on that day. :lol:

Can't be bought?   Did she seriously say that?

1. She said she accepted the $130K

2. She has sex on camera for a living.  

3. She is doing private webcam show's with people.  

:lol:   

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Highmark said:

Can't be bought?   Did she seriously say that?

1. She said she accepted the $130K

2. She has sex on camera for a living.  

3. She is doing private webcam show's with people.  

:lol:   

The whole democrat strategy for Trump impeachment now comes down to wayward preachings of a washed up porn star.

:lol:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Top 9 Successful Ex–Playboy Bunnies

This weekend, Hugh Hefner rolled out a new Playboy Club in London. TIME takes a look at former bunnies who moved on to much better things
 
    •  
    • Like
      74
       
    • This page has been shared 2 times. View these Tweets.
    •  
      0
    • inShare3
Prev
4 of 9
Next
Everyone's Past Is Complicated

Kimba Wood

By Feifei SunFriday, June 03, 2011
dek Amy Sussman / Getty Images
 
 
With degrees from Harvard Law School and the London School of Economics (LSE), U.S. Federal Judge Kimba Wood would seem an unlikely candidate to have a Playboy past. But in the mid-1960s, a then cash-strapped Wood trained five days to be a bunny at a London Playboy Club while studying at LSE. As brief as it was, her stint at the club became a point of discussion after President Bill Clinton nominated Wood as his Attorney General in 1993. But it was her employment of an illegal immigrant that ultimately derailed her nomination for the Justice Department post.
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

trump colludes with Russians, tries to set up secret communication channels with them, lies constantly about the topic, has them in the WH, alone etc etc etc

and wolfie is upset about a god damn conversation between Clinton and lynch on an airport tarmac...

 you can't make this shit up

your willingness to gloss over that meeting while constantly bitching about trumps campaign collusion is baffling.  They just talked about the grandkids- sure they did

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Angry ginger said:

your willingness to gloss over that meeting while constantly bitching about trumps campaign collusion is baffling.  They just talked about the grandkids- sure they did

If the DNC told Slinger to paint his ass red and parade around in front of a bull he would do it. 

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Angry ginger said:

your willingness to gloss over that meeting while constantly bitching about trumps campaign collusion is baffling.  They just talked about the grandkids- sure they did

BFD if they met. a lot of people that could have ulterior motives "meet". Christ trump met alone with comey, after telling others to leave the room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
27 minutes ago, franks pond said:

wood.png

She's known as the "Love Judge" from having extramarital affairs.   :lol: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Highmark said:

She's known as the "Love Judge" from having extramarital affairs.   :lol: 

Who better to preside over a case involving Donald Trump!!!

She also trained to be playboy bunny too once upon a time.

Edited by ICEMAN!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
5 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said:

Who better to preside over a case involving Donald Trump!!!

She also trained to be playboy bunny too once upon a time.

Probably was a complete babe back in the day.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Snoslinger said:

why are you clowns so hung up on the god damn tarmac meeting? was bill meeting her illegal? Christ they could have met anywhere, any time. I also would think they would have picked a better place to meet than a god damn tarmac of an airport if they were trying to hide something. were the pilots, the crews, the airport personnel etc in on this conspiracy too?  :lol:

you clowns are a riot.

It wasn’t appropriate on 100 levels and she should have disbarred.  It tainted the investigation and the outcome proves it was a sham.  Good thing it’s not over yet. 

1 hour ago, ICEMAN! said:

It wasn’t unprecedented.  Lawyers offices have been raided before and there is a very high bar set in order for a warrant to be awarded.  SBYL

A year isn’t very long for a criminal investigation of this size and magnitude.  How long did the Benghazi BS go on for?  What became of that?  lmao

Weird that you’re so up in arms about Lynch and Bill Clinton and have no issues with Trump, the subject of multiple criminal investigations, actually RUNNING the Justice Dept that is investigating him?  Trump appointed the very people that are in charge of and are overseeing these investigations.....but yea....Clinton emails!!!!  Wahhhhhhhh

 

 It absolutely is for a presidents lawyers office to be raided.  It better be good, or it’s just more corrupt behavior.  All I am hearing from you and Slinger is accusations and opinions, no indictments, no facts, no convictions.

Broke the law, a felony, and top-secret national secrets were being exchanged on an unsecured server.  She was not charged when anyone else would have been in a heartbeat.  Liberal and conservative lawyers have all come to that conclusion.   Period.

1 hour ago, Snoslinger said:

trump colludes with Russians, tries to set up secret communication channels with them, lies constantly about the topic, has them in the WH, alone etc etc etc

and wolfie is upset about a god damn conversation between Clinton and lynch on an airport tarmac...

 you can't make this shit up

Accusation, no charges, no indictments, quit acting like Trump colluding with the Russians is a fact.  Your first mistake.  Heads of state meet with foreigners all the time, including incoming administrations.

Lynch meeting with the husband of the target of an investigation was not appropriate under any circumstances.  You clearly not zero about the law.  If I wasnt on my phone, I’d look up the codes.  Maybe you should.

Left field, that’s where you are.  You are free to think what you want but let’s let all of this play out and we will see who is right and who was wrong.  I don’t feel the need to continue to call you names over it when it’s just my opinion unlike you who seem so cock sure of everything. One things for sure I was dead on accurate about Trump from the beginning being our next president.  And guys like you were dead ass wrong. So there’s that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DriftBusta said:

It wasn’t appropriate on 100 levels and she should have disbarred.  It tainted the investigation and the outcome proves it was a sham.  Good thing it’s not over yet. 

 It absolutely is for a presidents lawyers office to be raided.  It better be good, or it’s just more corrupt behavior.  All I am hearing from you and Slinger is accusations and opinions, no indictments, no facts, no convictions.

Broke the law, a felony, and top-secret national secrets were being exchanged on an unsecured server.  She was not charged when anyone else would have been in a heartbeat.  Liberal and conservative lawyers have all come to that conclusion.   Period.

Accusation, no charges, no indictments, quit acting like Trump colluding with the Russians is a fact.  Your first mistake.  Heads of state meet with foreigners all the time, including incoming administrations.

Lynch meeting with the husband of the target of an investigation was not appropriate under any circumstances.  You clearly not zero about the law.  If I wasnt on my phone, I’d look up the codes.  Maybe you should.

Left field, that’s where you are.  You are free to think what you want but let’s let all of this play out and we will see who is right and who was wrong.  I don’t feel the need to continue to call you names over it when it’s just my opinion unlike you who seem so cock sure of everything. One things for sure I was dead on accurate about Trump from the beginning being our next president.  And guys like you were dead ass wrong. So there’s that.

Dude, his office was raided last week and the Feds haven’t had a chance to go through the evidence yet.  Be patient, the indictments are coming.

:bc:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Highmark said:

Probably was a complete babe back in the day.  

And wouldn't you wanna bang a chick named "Kimba" (assuming she didn't look like some reject extra in "Black Panther").

Hard to find an older pic of her when she was young.  This is the best I could find...she kinda had a little Erin Gray thing going on.

Kimba:

Related image    

Erin:

Image result for erin gray

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
3 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

And wouldn't you wanna bang a chick named "Kimba" (assuming she didn't look like some reject extra in "Black Panther").

Hard to find an older pic of her when she was young.  This is the best I could find...she kinda had a little Erin Gray thing going on.

Kimba:

Related image    

Erin:

Image result for erin gray

 

Oh man, Wilma Deering from Buck Rogers.  :fluffy:

Nice find and comparison!  

Edited by Highmark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This whole thing smells like a witch hunt.  So Mueller is looking for collusion, but while investigation that charge, he finds evidence of enough other criminal activity to raid a lawyer's office in hopes to find something that may justify the raid?  What a fucking joke....then they bring up Sean Hannity and dipshits on here think that he is also guilty of a crime?  I can't wait to actually see what happens..... "we know more about the circumstances now than then."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Kivalo said:

That privilege is not predicated on financial payment. 

You know what the good news is; Cohen kept taped recordings :lol: 

Now the question is was Cohen a fixer or a lawyer for Hannity, if he was lawyer we should not hear anything, now if he was a fixer we could here a titillating or perverted fixer story, we just don't know at this time :dunno: 

Edited by Mileage Psycho
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Highmark said:

Can't be bought?   Did she seriously say that?

1. She said she accepted the $130K

2. She has sex on camera for a living.  

3. She is doing private webcam show's with people.  

:lol:   

Well, it's still a more honest living than the politicians in DC. :lol:

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member

I have to laugh when they claim that there is no attorney client privilege simply because he might not have a long list of clients.   Companies have staff lawyers all the time that do nothing but work for the company.   That information should still be protected under the same Attorney/Client privilege laws.   Its not far fetched to think wealthy individuals wouldn't have the same.  

Edited by Highmark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, racer254 said:

This whole thing smells like a witch hunt.  So Mueller is looking for collusion, but while investigation that charge, he finds evidence of enough other criminal activity to raid a lawyer's office in hopes to find something that may justify the raid?  What a fucking joke....then they bring up Sean Hannity and dipshits on here think that he is also guilty of a crime?  I can't wait to actually see what happens..... "we know more about the circumstances now than then."

Mueller didn’t raid Cohen’s office

Cohen has been under investigation for months apparently by the SDNY, not Mueller

SBYL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, racer254 said:

This whole thing smells like a witch hunt.  So Mueller is looking for collusion, but while investigation that charge, he finds evidence of enough other criminal activity to raid a lawyer's office in hopes to find something that may justify the raid?  What a fucking joke....then they bring up Sean Hannity and dipshits on here think that he is also guilty of a crime?  I can't wait to actually see what happens..... "we know more about the circumstances now than then."

Slinger and Ice are guilty of “gratuitous speculation”. :lol: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DriftBusta said:

Slinger and Ice are guilty of “gratuitous speculation”. :lol: 

No speculation that there was enough evidence to have a judge sign off on a very rare warrant against an attorney’s office, home and hotel room. 

:news:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, DriftBusta said:

It wasn’t appropriate on 100 levels and she should have disbarred.  It tainted the investigation and the outcome proves it was a sham.  Good thing it’s not over yet. 

 It absolutely is for a presidents lawyers office to be raided.  It better be good, or it’s just more corrupt behavior.  All I am hearing from you and Slinger is accusations and opinions, no indictments, no facts, no convictions.

Broke the law, a felony, and top-secret national secrets were being exchanged on an unsecured server.  She was not charged when anyone else would have been in a heartbeat.  Liberal and conservative lawyers have all come to that conclusion.   Period.

Accusation, no charges, no indictments, quit acting like Trump colluding with the Russians is a fact.  Your first mistake.  Heads of state meet with foreigners all the time, including incoming administrations.

Lynch meeting with the husband of the target of an investigation was not appropriate under any circumstances.  You clearly not zero about the law.  If I wasnt on my phone, I’d look up the codes.  Maybe you should.

Left field, that’s where you are.  You are free to think what you want but let’s let all of this play out and we will see who is right and who was wrong.  I don’t feel the need to continue to call you names over it when it’s just my opinion unlike you who seem so cock sure of everything. One things for sure I was dead on accurate about Trump from the beginning being our next president.  And guys like you were dead ass wrong. So there’s that.

What if Obama fired her instead? Before any investigation discussion? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said:

Mueller didn’t raid Cohen’s office

Cohen has been under investigation for months apparently by the SDNY, not Mueller

SBYL

You are just as dumb as the rest here.  Bunch of know nothing idiots.

"The prosecutors obtained the search warrant after receiving a referral from the special counsel in the Russia investigation, Robert S. Mueller III, according to Mr. Cohen’s lawyer"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...