Democrats Caught Red Handed Engaging In Voter Fraud

[toslow]

56 minutes ago, Skidooski said:

So now you guys throw a 3+ year tantrum when Trump loses? 

Apples and oranges 

demos went full retard 

Edited May 4, 2023 by toslow

[Skidooski]

26 minutes ago, toslow said:

Apples and oranges 

demos went full retard 

 ahhh....no! Same same just opposite sides

[Jimmy Snacks]

1 hour ago, toslow said:

Apples and oranges 

demos went full retard 

 

49 minutes ago, Skidooski said:

 ahhh....no! Same same just opposite sides

Amazing how some can’t see this.🤔

[Rigid1]

11 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said:

Keep propping up a fucking traitor.

Been a racist too a long time.  Fucking idiot.

 

 

I saw that last night on the news, that was some majorly racist shit said by Biden on the floor..Unreal..

[DriftBusta]

8 hours ago, Crnr2Crnr said:

 

so much inconvenience... 

Yeah.  And?  Not a fucking thing wrong with that phone call.

3 hours ago, Skidooski said:

So now you guys throw a 3+ year tantrum when Trump loses? 

One lie, one outrage, one truth exposed after another, and the country doesn't have reason to not trust a fucking thing coming from this administration and the msm?  3 year tantrum?  How about waking up to the worst corruption in our lifetimes after almost 3 years of a pandemic that had all too convenient and shady origins?  Are  you really that simple?

[racer254]

8 hours ago, akvanden said:

Strange how these election threads always get thrown off course when no one can provide any evidence of mass voter fraud. Just a whole lot of “I feels….”

How many more do you want?  There is TONS of evidence of voter fraud.  Keep the blinders on, criminals love that.

[Crnr2Crnr]

13 minutes ago, DriftBusta said:

Yeah.  And?  Not a fucking thing wrong with that phone call.

 

https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/20/politics/georgia-racketeering-conspiracy-trump-willis/index.html

 

[Skidooski]

13 minutes ago, DriftBusta said:

Yeah.  And?  Not a fucking thing wrong with that phone call.

One lie, one outrage, one truth exposed after another, and the country doesn't have reason to not trust a fucking thing coming from this administration and the msm?  3 year tantrum?  How about waking up to the worst corruption in our lifetimes after almost 3 years of a pandemic that had all too convenient and shady origins?  Are  you really that simple?

Simple??? Dems had a hissy fit for a little while after she lost. You guys have been having one continuous one since he lost…..in 2020. That’s three years dude! That’s the apple to basket of apples comparison 

[racer254]

9 hours ago, akvanden said:

Strange how these election threads always get thrown off course when no one can provide any evidence of mass voter fraud. Just a whole lot of “I feels….”

135,000 TEST BALLOTS.......Yeah, right  the ballot count went up 17%  Remember that late night bump that biden got?

But within hours of the new figures coming online, the board backtracked – following questions from the Adams campaign and others – and acknowledged a “discrepancy” in its counting process. It subsequently removed the data from its website. Late Tuesday night, the body put out another statement, this time revealing it had mistakenly included 135,000 test vote records in the initial tally. The count will be re-run once the slate is cleared.

Hours before the BOE disclosed the mistake, Adams sent out a pointed statement asking why the total number of votes had gone up so much since last week.

That figure, as of last Tuesday night, was 799,827. One week later, the preliminary results included 941,832 votes.

[Crnr2Crnr]

2 minutes ago, Skidooski said:

Simple??? Dems had a hissy fit for a little while after she lost. You guys have been having one continuous one since he lost…..in 2020. That’s three years dude! That’s the apple to basket of apples comparison 

imagine the hissy fit if he loses again... not that he or Biden should even be candidates for 2024

[Deephaven]

Not if, but when.

[racer254]

A very big concern is the fact that republicans are trying to make our elections more secure, but at every step they are met with resistance from democrats.

Why wouldn't both parties want to try and make election fraud harder to do?  Why would one party constantly want to make elections easier to rig?

[Jimmy Snacks]

Just now, racer254 said:

A very big concern is the fact that republicans are trying to make our elections more secure, but at every step they are met with resistance from democrats.

Why wouldn't both parties want to try and make election fraud harder to do?  Why would one party constantly want to make elections easier to rig?

Right and Trump didn’t want to spend all that money…SMH.

[akvanden]

8 hours ago, toslow said:

Prove there wasn’t ?

That's not how making bogus claims works.
 

27 minutes ago, racer254 said:

How many more do you want?  There is TONS of evidence of voter fraud.  Keep the blinders on, criminals love that.

None of those proves mass voter fraud, just like the example the OP lead with does either. The example does even show a change in the vote outcome as all four votes she put into the ballot box were valid.
 

20 minutes ago, racer254 said:

135,000 TEST BALLOTS.......Yeah, right  the ballot count went up 17%  Remember that late night bump that biden got?

But within hours of the new figures coming online, the board backtracked – following questions from the Adams campaign and others – and acknowledged a “discrepancy” in its counting process. It subsequently removed the data from its website. Late Tuesday night, the body put out another statement, this time revealing it had mistakenly included 135,000 test vote records in the initial tally. The count will be re-run once the slate is cleared.

Hours before the BOE disclosed the mistake, Adams sent out a pointed statement asking why the total number of votes had gone up so much since last week.

That figure, as of last Tuesday night, was 799,827. One week later, the preliminary results included 941,832 votes.

Not sure why you keep using this democratic primary as an example. If anything, it just goes to prove that the system works and they caught the mishap right away. If someone dumped 135,000 ballots into a dropbox during a general election, I think the representatives from either party that are watching the process (polling judges) might question that. 



And then all the lawsuits, audits, cyber ninjas, 2000 mules, and on and on and on. Unable to turn up anything other than minor. 



How long you planning to hold on?

[Skidooski]

23 minutes ago, Crnr2Crnr said:

imagine the hissy fit if he loses again... not that he or Biden should even be candidates for 2024

Neither of them should be running but if he loses again it will be permanent butt hurt

[Crnr2Crnr]

1 minute ago, Skidooski said:

Neither of them should be running but if he loses again it will be permanent butt hurt

the retaliation tour 

Trump 2024

[racer254]

5 minutes ago, akvanden said:

None of those proves mass voter fraud, just like the example the OP lead with does either. The example does even show a change in the vote outcome as all four votes she put into the ballot box were valid.
 

Not sure why you keep using this democratic primary as an example. If anything, it just goes to prove that the system works and they caught the mishap right away. If someone dumped 135,000 ballots into a dropbox during a general election, I think the representatives from either party that are watching the process (polling judges) might question that. 
 

Because it proves that the system can easily be rigged.

I know it is hard for some to understand that and for some reason trump haters want to make the fraud more about trump than the simple fact that it is happening and did happen. 

You "think" the representatives are watching....DUH.  That is why there are documentaries and many politicians/judges/lawyers questioning the process.  What more do you need?  When hillary lost, the dems were in shock and awe over the fact that they didn't do it correctly.  Guess what, they found the 55k of fraudulent votes needed to win this election in the key spots.  They did it using the pandemic and drop boxes, group voting and other sneaky ways that made it hard to prove fraud.  Again, there is a reason the democrats push back every time election laws are proposed to make voting more secure.

[stinkipinki]

There is a good chance Trump will win in 24.
Even with the stranglehold the Dems have on media and silicon valley, the USA is in shambles.
It's the worst by far I've ever seen it.

The border is a mess, the inflation is a mess, everything is super expensive, crime is through the fucking roof, all of the Wal-Marts and business's are closing in those Riot run liberal cites, its bad man. And the Dem's have no one else to run. Trump might actually win.

[akvanden]

44 minutes ago, racer254 said:

Because it proves that the system can easily be rigged.

No it doesn’t. That’s an extreme leap. But, let’s say you did want to rig the election. What’s your plan? Where you getting 55k mail in ballots from? You hand writing all those in? 55k real names and addresses or fake ones? Will they scan properly or will there be duplicate names? Is it auditable? You dumping them all at once? Will that raise suspicion? Maybe scatter the dump, but who are these lowly mules that your paying $100 to dump ballots for you? Will $100 be enough to guarantee their silence or should you pay them more? Would they happily turn on you if they ever got themselves in legal trouble?

There would be nothing “easy” about coordinating mass voter fraud.

 

44 minutes ago, racer254 said:

know it is hard for some to understand that and for some reason trump haters want to make the fraud more about trump than the simple fact that it is happening and did happen. 

No mass voter fraud has been proven in any general election. Trump has nothing to do with it other than being one of the morons making things up.

 

44 minutes ago, racer254 said:

What more do you need? 

Proof. Any kind of proof that proves mass voter fraud. It should be simple since it’s so “easy.”

Edited May 4, 2023 by akvanden

[racer254]

11 minutes ago, akvanden said:

No it doesn’t. That’s an extreme leap. But, let’s say you did want to rig the election. What’s your plan? Where you getting 55k mail in ballots from? You hand writing all those in? 55k real names and addresses or fake ones? Will they scan properly or will there be duplicate names? Is it auditable? You dumping them all at once? Will that raise suspicion? Maybe scatter the dump, but who are these lowly mules that your paying $100 to dump ballots for you? Will $100 be enough to guarantee their silence or should you pay them more? Would they happily turn on you if they ever got themselves in legal trouble?

There would be nothing “easy” about coordinating mass voter fraud.

 

No mass voter fraud has been proven in any general election. Trump has nothing to do with it other than being one of the morons making things up.

 

Proof. Any kind of proof that proves mass voter fried. It should be simple since it’s so “easy.”

LOL.  135,000 ballots isn't enough proof for you, then you have blinders on.  And stop trying to make it seem like it would be difficult, that is what the narrative is so that you will continue to deny it. 

Lump in bioterror and elections and that was done back in the 80's like it was in 2020 only to a much larger scale.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1984_Rajneeshee_bioterror_attack

In 1984, 751 people suffered food poisoning in The Dalles, Oregon, United States, due to the deliberate contamination of salad bars at ten local restaurants with Salmonella. A group of prominent followers of Rajneesh (later known as Osho) led by Ma Anand Sheela had hoped to incapacitate the voting population of the city so that their own candidates would win the 1984 Wasco County elections.^[2] The incident was the first and is still the single largest bioterrorist attack in U.S. history

[Deephaven]

So you are saying 81,282,916 - 135,000 > 81M.  ie, it made no difference.

No one said there wasn't cheating, but if that is the complete effort of an all in conspiracy to rig an election it was a monstrous failure.  Or it is what it is, which is not a deep state run collusion but a few zealots doing what they will always do.

[Steve753]

1 hour ago, akvanden said:

No it doesn’t. That’s an extreme leap. But, let’s say you did want to rig the election. What’s your plan? Where you getting 55k mail in ballots from? You hand writing all those in? 55k real names and addresses or fake ones? Will they scan properly or will there be duplicate names? Is it auditable? You dumping them all at once? Will that raise suspicion? Maybe scatter the dump, but who are these lowly mules that your paying $100 to dump ballots for you? Will $100 be enough to guarantee their silence or should you pay them more? Would they happily turn on you if they ever got themselves in legal trouble?

There would be nothing “easy” about coordinating mass voter fraud.

 

No mass voter fraud has been proven in any general election. Trump has nothing to do with it other than being one of the morons making things up.

 

Proof. Any kind of proof that proves mass voter fraud. It should be simple since it’s so “easy.”

They can feel they cheated!!!!

[akvanden]

1 hour ago, racer254 said:

LOL.  135,000 ballots isn't enough proof for you, then you have blinders on. 

So if you dumped 135,000 mail in ballots into a drop box during the general election, and it was immediately found and removed, rather than using it as an example of the process working as it should, you’d use it as a failure? Ok…. 

 

1 hour ago, racer254 said:

And stop trying to make it seem like it would be difficult, that is what the narrative is so that you will continue to deny it. 

It would be very difficult to coordinate mass voter fraud. Articulate otherwise and prove me wrong.

[akvanden]

11 hours ago, Badger** said:

This is an interesting list. 

https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud/search?combine=&state=All&year=&case_type=All&fraud_type=All&page=0 

Still no mass voter fraud or conspiracy to commit mass voter fraud on the list.

[racer254]

54 minutes ago, Deephaven said:

So you are saying 81,282,916 - 135,000 > 81M.  ie, it made no difference.

No one said there wasn't cheating, but if that is the complete effort of an all in conspiracy to rig an election it was a monstrous failure.  Or it is what it is, which is not a deep state run collusion but a few zealots doing what they will always do.

I see they have you focused on the 81 million, but you failed to realize that we have an electoral college that requires 270 electoral votes to "win" the election.  37 electoral votes 3 states or 55,000 votes changed the election.