jdsky 960 Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 15 hours ago, mnstang said: You guys are pretty weird. Saying that it has only just caught up. Weird way if thinking. I'm not saying the catalyst is anything in particular, I haven't ridden one. But I'm not such a simpleton to think that a sled is only a riding position. At least you admit you haven't ridden one. Anyone who has ridden doo or poo for years on different iterations of rider forward chassis' knows the catalyst will not be a game changer and those that have ridden it and can actually compare it to the others have been saying exactly that. Belt drive is not going to make it radically different. Laydown engine and centering the mass (even if it turns out to be a bit more than poo or doo) is not going to make it radically different for the average trail rider. The catalyst may eventually work out to be a better option for riders that own the other brands. It's clear that for now it's the best option for existing cat owners that want a rider forward design. The other shit, belt drive, composite running boards is shit for now that will have zero bearing on changing brands. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.