Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

MIT Researchers Admit Anti-Maskers Are More Scientifically Rigorous


Recommended Posts

  • Platinum Contributing Member

:lmao:Poor MC.

https://www.intellectualtakeout.org/mit-researchers-admit-anti-maskers-are-more-scientifically-rigorous/

At the same time the academics admit, almost in a puzzled fashion, that these “anti-maskers” do their investigations  in a very scientific manner. “Indeed,” the paper claims, “anti-maskers often reveal themselves to be more sophisticated in their understanding of how scientific knowledge is socially constructed than their ideological adversaries, who espouse naive realism about the ‘objective’ truth of public health data.”

The MIT academics go on to admit that those opposed to masks are not afraid to get down and dirty in looking at statistics, nor are they afraid to increasingly question the media and government authorities, a trait MIT researchers call “a weaponization of critical thinking.” Even more surprising is the revelation that anti-maskers’ “approach to the pandemic is grounded in a more scientific rigor, not less.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Carlos Danger said:

Another long lasting effect Trump has had is the basic tenent to question the daily news as given. 

BINGO!  That "fake news" chant really set the media off.....because they knew what it would do.  Trump absolutely went to war with a force that was going to kill him off....and did but, it didn't change what many started to see with our corrupt media.  FACT:  For all Trumps bluster and faults...he got this one right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Carlos Danger said:

Another long lasting effect Trump has had is the basic tenent to question the daily news as given. 

Even my wife, a self proclaimed "moderate", has developed a disdain for the media.  She came up with this all on her own, I'm so proud of her!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
50 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

BINGO!  That "fake news" chant really set the media off.....because they knew what it would do.  Trump absolutely went to war with a force that was going to kill him off....and did but, it didn't change what many started to see with our corrupt media.  FACT:  For all Trumps bluster and faults...he got this one right.

His biggest victory was the awakening of 75+ million to the lies and propaganda of corp msm.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Highmark said:

His biggest victory was the awakening of 75+ million to the lies and propaganda of corp msm.  

Without question.  If there was a softer way to do it, that would have been better but, there really wasn’t.  2024 should be interesting after 4 years of the msms really trying (covertly) hard to try and make sure they stop being questioned.  We’ll see

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
8 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

Without question.  If there was a softer way to do it, that would have been better but, there really wasn’t.  2024 should be interesting after 4 years of the msms really trying (covertly) hard to try and make sure they stop being questioned.  We’ll see

It couldn't get done with a softer tone.   Yes he lost some but the extra exposure woke more up than he lost. 

Edited by Highmark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Highmark said:

:lmao:Poor MC.

https://www.intellectualtakeout.org/mit-researchers-admit-anti-maskers-are-more-scientifically-rigorous/

At the same time the academics admit, almost in a puzzled fashion, that these “anti-maskers” do their investigations  in a very scientific manner. “Indeed,” the paper claims, “anti-maskers often reveal themselves to be more sophisticated in their understanding of how scientific knowledge is socially constructed than their ideological adversaries, who espouse naive realism about the ‘objective’ truth of public health data.”

The MIT academics go on to admit that those opposed to masks are not afraid to get down and dirty in looking at statistics, nor are they afraid to increasingly question the media and government authorities, a trait MIT researchers call “a weaponization of critical thinking.” Even more surprising is the revelation that anti-maskers’ “approach to the pandemic is grounded in a more scientific rigor, not less.”

Says the Uber right wing website

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
3 minutes ago, Mainecat said:

Says the Uber right wing website

:lol:   Siting an MIT study is uber right wing.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Mainecat said:

Says the Uber right wing website

So is MIT a Uber right university then also ? 

But keep bowing down to king fauchi even after he has been proven to have been serving you up lie after lie for over a yr now.  If Fauchi bull shit less salty then regular bullshit or about the same ? Just concerned about your sodium intake 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

22 hours ago, Zambroski said:

BINGO!  That "fake news" chant really set the media off.....because they knew what it would do.  Trump absolutely went to war with a force that was going to kill him off....and did but, it didn't change what many started to see with our corrupt media.  FACT:  For all Trumps bluster and faults...he got this one right.

And I get great satisfaction knowing many of us had this one right since day one.

20 hours ago, Zambroski said:

Without question.  If there was a softer way to do it, that would have been better but, there really wasn’t.  2024 should be interesting after 4 years of the msms really trying (covertly) hard to try and make sure they stop being questioned.  We’ll see

If there is no other good takeaway from Trumps presidency, its him exposing the corrupt media.  The way they act however, shows they're pretending his 4 years never happened, and they are proceeding with the same playbook, without even a flinch.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member

Best part is when a college or group does a study like this expecting different results so they can try and throw it those peoples faces. :lmao:

At the same time the academics admit, almost in a puzzled fashion, that these “anti-maskers” do their investigations  in a very scientific manner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol



×
×
  • Create New...