Snake Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 Just now, SSFB said: There have been many instances worthy of storming the Capital in the past but like I said earlier, guys like you could only be bothered to cheer it on when it was for the Orange man. Dems have been burning federal buildings all year... where the fuck were you then? 3 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 6, 2021 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 6, 2021 (edited) 15 minutes ago, ckf said: Come on dude....if the constitution was truly broken Trump would have a leg to stand on. Besides saying nothing got thru in the courts tell me where I'm wrong? All I ask is look and listen about the non-legislature election changes with an open mind. If you think the pandemic was legal means around the constitution then so be it. I don't. You don't think the courts didn't fear a larger reprisal if they reversed the election? What we are seeing today would be minuscule by comparison and it would be happening all over the country. https://www.heritage.org/election-integrity/commentary/2020-election-redo-4-states-here-are-the-details-about-texas-lawsuit Pennsylvania: The complaint accuses Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar of, among other things, “without legislative approval, unilaterally abrogating” Pennsylvania statutes that require “signature verification for absentee or mail-in ballots.” These changes were “not ratified” by the Pennsylvania legislature. Georgia: Similarly, the complaint describes how Georgia’s Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, also “without legislative approval, unilaterally abrogated Georgia’s statute governing the signature verification process for absentee ballots.” Michigan: The complaint states that Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson “abrogated Michigan election statutes related to absentee ballot applications and signature verification.” Wisconsin: Lastly, the Wisconsin’s elections commission made similar changes in state laws without the permission of the legislature that “weakened, or did away with, established security procedures put in place by the Wisconsin legislature to ensure absentee ballot integrity.” https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/11/09/liberals-changed-rules-of-2020-election/ Edited January 6, 2021 by Highmark 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awful knawful Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 2 minutes ago, ckf said: America the beautiful I'm so glad my sister lives in a small town in Wyoming. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted January 6, 2021 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 6, 2021 (edited) Let the orange POS revel in this...he still lost plus his mouth lost the Senate as well. Edited January 6, 2021 by Jimmy Snacks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 As I just said on the twats, I've been saying the following two related things for decades: A. Will To Power is an incredibly stupid game that should not be played and II. At some point, both sides will play it. If you think I'm going to do anything other than laugh like the Joker because the inevitable has occurred, bless. Gratuitously stolen quip. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 4 minutes ago, ckf said: Didn't say that they couldn't, but you can't stop the election process without proof. Is this really that hard to understand? Just like the libs didn't take Trump down in 3 years, Trump isn't going to change the results of the election. Agree to disagree my friend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 I guess when your senator is a avowed socialist..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 When you have Stacey Abrams going on TV and bragging about how Georgia was able to wipe out signature verification as if that's some sort of good thing, it certainly doesn't help anyone feel like it's a fair and legit election... Why do the dems want to disenfranchise everyone? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cop Watch Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 The whole point of protesting is to make ppl uncomfortable. Activists take that discomfort w/ the status quo & advocate for concrete policy changes. Popular support often starts small & grows. To folks who complain protest demands make others uncomfortable... that’s the point 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SayatodaU.P.eh? Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 1 minute ago, Matt said: When you have Stacey Abrams going on TV and bragging about how Georgia was able to wipe out signature verification as if that's some sort of good thing, it certainly doesn't help anyone feel like it's a fair and legit election... Why do the dems want to disenfranchise everyone? Because they’re better than everyone else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 9 minutes ago, Highmark said: Besides saying nothing got thru in the courts tell me where I'm wrong? All I ask is look and listen about the non-legislature election changes with an open mind. If you think the pandemic was legal means around the constitution then so be it. I don't. You don't think the courts didn't fear a larger reprisal if they reversed the election? What we are seeing today would be minuscule by comparison and it would be happening all over the country. https://www.heritage.org/election-integrity/commentary/2020-election-redo-4-states-here-are-the-details-about-texas-lawsuit Pennsylvania: The complaint accuses Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar of, among other things, “without legislative approval, unilaterally abrogating” Pennsylvania statutes that require “signature verification for absentee or mail-in ballots.” These changes were “not ratified” by the Pennsylvania legislature. Georgia: Similarly, the complaint describes how Georgia’s Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, also “without legislative approval, unilaterally abrogated Georgia’s statute governing the signature verification process for absentee ballots.” Michigan: The complaint states that Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson “abrogated Michigan election statutes related to absentee ballot applications and signature verification.” Wisconsin: Lastly, the Wisconsin’s elections commission made similar changes in state laws without the permission of the legislature that “weakened, or did away with, established security procedures put in place by the Wisconsin legislature to ensure absentee ballot integrity.” https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/11/09/liberals-changed-rules-of-2020-election/ Why are democrats always trying to change the way elections are held? Every year there is something else they are trying to do cheat to get power. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 So can we use our covid vacc as a national id card for voting! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 6, 2021 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 6, 2021 (edited) 17 hours ago, racer254 said: Why are democrats always trying to change the way elections are held? Every year there is something else they are trying to do cheat to get power. Don't shit yourself, both sides do it but this year was like nothing the nations ever seen....all with the excuse of a "pandemic." "Here...we won't make you verify who you are to vote but feel free to jump on a plane with 300 other people." Typical absentee ballot rejections are around 15%. Mail in votes this year were rejected at rates under 1/2 of 1%. Edited January 7, 2021 by Highmark 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 1 minute ago, Highmark said: Don't shit yourself, both sides do it but this year was like nothing the nations ever seen....all with the excuse of a "pandemic." Here we won't make you verify who you are to vote but feel free to jump on a plane with 300 other people. Typical absentee ballot rejections are around 15%. Mail in votes this year were rejected at rates under 1/2 of 1%. I agree, they both probably try to do it, but for an incumbent POTUS to gain 11 million votes has NEVER been done before. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 6, 2021 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 6, 2021 (edited) 2 minutes ago, racer254 said: I agree, they both probably try to do it, but for an incumbent POTUS to gain 11 million votes has NEVER been done before. Even the US SC was complicit. Fear of national reprisals. Since when do other states not have a "judicially cognizable interest" in other states elections when it defrauds their own voters. Shameful. They never would even rule if Texas was right....just made up some bullshit about other states aren't defrauded by other states cheating. The court, in a brief unsigned order, said Texas lacked standing to pursue the case, saying it “has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its elections.” Edited January 6, 2021 by Highmark 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member Kivalo Posted January 6, 2021 Gold Member Share Posted January 6, 2021 I see this as no different than the BLM/ANTIFA bullshit except the media is of course spinning this as domestic terrorism. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 28 minutes ago, Snake said: Yeah... those 4 years that were basically the best this country ever saw was due to democrats. Thats how stupid you sound. Where is the proof of election fraud. Trumps lawyers showed up in court with nothing. This is the best Rudy could come up with and you all sound as dumb as her. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ckf Posted January 6, 2021 Author Share Posted January 6, 2021 25 minutes ago, Highmark said: Besides saying nothing got thru in the courts tell me where I'm wrong? All I ask is look and listen about the non-legislature election changes with an open mind. If you think the pandemic was legal means around the constitution then so be it. I don't. You don't think the courts didn't fear a larger reprisal if they reversed the election? What we are seeing today would be minuscule by comparison and it would be happening all over the country. https://www.heritage.org/election-integrity/commentary/2020-election-redo-4-states-here-are-the-details-about-texas-lawsuit Pennsylvania: The complaint accuses Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar of, among other things, “without legislative approval, unilaterally abrogating” Pennsylvania statutes that require “signature verification for absentee or mail-in ballots.” These changes were “not ratified” by the Pennsylvania legislature. Georgia: Similarly, the complaint describes how Georgia’s Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, also “without legislative approval, unilaterally abrogated Georgia’s statute governing the signature verification process for absentee ballots.” Michigan: The complaint states that Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson “abrogated Michigan election statutes related to absentee ballot applications and signature verification.” Wisconsin: Lastly, the Wisconsin’s elections commission made similar changes in state laws without the permission of the legislature that “weakened, or did away with, established security procedures put in place by the Wisconsin legislature to ensure absentee ballot integrity.” https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/11/09/liberals-changed-rules-of-2020-election/ I will look through it tomorrow morning when I have time 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 6, 2021 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 6, 2021 (edited) 10 minutes ago, racer254 said: I agree, they both probably try to do it, but for an incumbent POTUS to gain 11 million votes has NEVER been done before. I won't dive more in the other anomalies right now, my main case is a pandemic doesn't delay or set aside the constitution. What way will they use this next and I'm not just talking about this pandemic. Get enough judges on your side and you can use any national emergency to temporarily or permanently ignore it. Dangerous precedence here. Remember when the dems were floating around using a national emergency to get around the 2nd under Obama? Edited January 6, 2021 by Highmark 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 3 minutes ago, Kivalo said: I see this as no different than the BLM/ANTIFA bullshit except the media is of course spinning this as domestic terrorism. Well, this is a bit different but yeah, media spin is in full tilt. 1 minute ago, revkevsdi said: Where is the proof of election fraud. Trumps lawyers showed up in court with nothing. This is the best Rudy could come up with and you all sound as dumb as her. Canada, dipshit. Your country is Canada. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ckf Posted January 6, 2021 Author Share Posted January 6, 2021 26 minutes ago, Jimmy Snacks said: Let the orange POS revel in this...he still lost plus his mouth lost the Senate as well. That's the worst part 25 minutes ago, Dave said: Agree to disagree my friend. That's the way you have to approach it around here 23 minutes ago, Snake said: I guess when your senator is a avowed socialist..... Never have, and never will vote for him....next? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 6, 2021 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 6, 2021 2 minutes ago, Zambroski said: Well, this is a bit different but yeah, media spin is in full tilt. Canada, dipshit. Your country is Canada. NBC was talking about the line of succession being protected. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 1 minute ago, Highmark said: NBC was talking about the line of succession being protected. I bounced around the networks just to see the different “tales”. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ckf Posted January 6, 2021 Author Share Posted January 6, 2021 I prefer BBC news whenever possible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeeter21i Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 (edited) "RIOTERS!" "COUP ATTEMPT!" "AWEFUL SITUATION!" "INSURRECTIONESTS! " "DANGEROUS MOB" Edited January 6, 2021 by Skeeter21i 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.