Ez ryder Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 27 minutes ago, Jimmy Snacks said: Sure thing Carl... https://www.npr.org/2018/06/29/624467256/what-happened-with-merrick-garland-in-2016-and-why-it-matters-now Lol so in your opinion the starting of politically modavated court appointments started in 2016 lmfao Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 19, 2020 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 19, 2020 (edited) 14 hours ago, Highmark said: This but because what the GOP did it will look hypocritical putting someone thru. 5 hours ago, Jimmy Snacks said: Jesus H Christ do you ever stop crying for Trump?🤣 BTW this is what Goober had to say.... Jesus H Christ do you ever stop bashing him about everything. Edited September 19, 2020 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted September 19, 2020 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 19, 2020 2 hours ago, Highmark said: Jesus H Christ do you ever stop bashing him about everything. I’m bashing Graham not Trump. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted September 19, 2020 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 19, 2020 Amen Justin.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 12 minutes ago, Jimmy Snacks said: Amen Justin.... Again where did the "Standards" change? you think Garland? Advise and consent turned into search and destroy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmo Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 14 minutes ago, Jimmy Snacks said: Amen Justin.... Those things don’t matter anymore. It’s more important that you fuck over the other team. 👍 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 Listen to Alan Simpson break it down for you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 Biden said if the Dems control Congress they will vote for 11 judges if a appointment is made before the election. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
01mxz800 Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 1 minute ago, Mainecat said: Biden said if the Dems control Congress they will vote for 11 judges if a appointment is made before the election. what are the Vegas odds of that happening? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmo Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 59 minutes ago, Mainecat said: Biden said if the Dems control Congress they will vote for 11 judges if a appointment is made before the election. Stack the courts. I’m sure you support this. Why not 300 Supreme Court justices? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member BOHICA Posted September 19, 2020 Gold Member Share Posted September 19, 2020 1 hour ago, Mainecat said: Biden said if the Dems control Congress they will vote for 11 judges if a appointment is made before the election. Trump will prolly veto that during his next term Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racinfarmer Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 2 hours ago, Mainecat said: Biden said if the Dems control Congress they will vote for 11 judges if a appointment is made before the election. Aren't there 9 sitting on the bench? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry ginger Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 2 hours ago, 01mxz800 said: what are the Vegas odds of that happening? better and better all the time. The pubs stand a great chance of losing Maine, NC, AZ and CO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 22 minutes ago, racinfarmer said: Aren't there 9 sitting on the bench? Yes it is called packing the court and it has been tried in the past. You would think the Dems would have learned what happens when you change long standing rules. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted September 19, 2020 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 19, 2020 4 hours ago, Carlos Danger said: Again where did the "Standards" change? you think Garland? Advise and consent turned into search and destroy. Well when the fuck does it end Carl? I didn’t say is started with Garland but FFS at some point this juvenile tit for tat shit needs to stop. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 There's precedent for a president in an election year nominating and having approved his supreme court nominee. It's only ever happened when the party in control of the Senate aligns to the pres. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 4 minutes ago, Jimmy Snacks said: Well when the fuck does it end Carl? I didn’t say is started with Garland but FFS at some point this juvenile tit for tat shit needs to stop. Biden says he will pack the court if the Dems don't get their way so obviously the Dems will not be using any common sense in the matter. I say screw the Dems and run Trumps pick through the meat grinder and see what happens. Going to have a tough time dusting up a female pick during the confirmation especially the two names being floated about. Time for the Dems to lose at the game they have started. We could make a drinking game out of how many times the dem talking heads use the term "unprecedented" in the following weeks and I bet none of us would be able to walk after a night of listening to them complain on cable news. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DriftBusta Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 (edited) 13 minutes ago, Carlos Danger said: Biden says he will pack the court if the Dems don't get their way so obviously the Dems will not be using any common sense in the matter. I say screw the Dems and run Trumps pick through the meat grinder and see what happens. Going to have a tough time dusting up a female pick during the confirmation especially the two names being floated about. Time for the Dems to lose at the game they have started. We could make a drinking game out of how many times the dem talking heads use the term "unprecedented" in the following weeks and I bet none of us would be able to walk after a night of listening to them complain on cable news. Well said. Especially the bold. They still have zero interest in a bipartisan government, and their behavior for the past 4 years has been abhorrent. Ive rethought my opinion on waiting until after the election, after thinking about it for 5 minutes. Fuck the Democrats, some of hem are calling for McConnells murder. This is how too many of them think. They want a war so lets give them one. Edited September 19, 2020 by DriftBusta Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XCR1250 Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/amy-coney-barrett-emerging-front-runner-fill-ginsburg-s-supreme-n1240547 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted September 20, 2020 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 20, 2020 23 hours ago, Roosting said: Fuck was he talking in Chinese? I already posted how. "A lame duck POTUS" Do you have this scenario in government right now? Do you know the definition of a lame duck POTUS? How about this...pretty clear what Graham said.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted September 20, 2020 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 20, 2020 12 hours ago, Carlos Danger said: Biden says he will pack the court if the Dems don't get their way so obviously the Dems will not be using any common sense in the matter. I say screw the Dems and run Trumps pick through the meat grinder and see what happens. Going to have a tough time dusting up a female pick during the confirmation especially the two names being floated about. Time for the Dems to lose at the game they have started. We could make a drinking game out of how many times the dem talking heads use the term "unprecedented" in the following weeks and I bet none of us would be able to walk after a night of listening to them complain on cable news. 12 hours ago, DriftBusta said: Well said. Especially the bold. They still have zero interest in a bipartisan government, and their behavior for the past 4 years has been abhorrent. Ive rethought my opinion on waiting until after the election, after thinking about it for 5 minutes. Fuck the Democrats, some of hem are calling for McConnells murder. This is how too many of them think. They want a war so lets give them one. Well here we have it...the last word from two guys that are interested in nothing but bipartisanship and compromise...WTF.🤣🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmo Posted September 20, 2020 Share Posted September 20, 2020 13 hours ago, Carlos Danger said: Yes it is called packing the court and it has been tried in the past. You would think the Dems would have learned what happens when you change long standing rules. Apparently RBG thought this was a bad idea. FLASHBACK: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg chastises Democrats on court packing, calling it a “bad idea” and “partisan.” "9 seems to be a good number... I think it was a bad idea when President Franklin Roosevelt tried... I am not at all in favor of that..." 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted September 20, 2020 Share Posted September 20, 2020 1 hour ago, Jimmy Snacks said: Well here we have it...the last word from two guys that are interested in nothing but bipartisanship and compromise...WTF.🤣🤣 What does bipartisanship mean to you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted September 20, 2020 Share Posted September 20, 2020 1 hour ago, Jimmy Snacks said: How about this...pretty clear what Graham said.... I think Lindsey was pretty even keeled until the Kavanaugh hearings and after that forget it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted September 20, 2020 Share Posted September 20, 2020 1 hour ago, Jimmy Snacks said: Well here we have it...the last word from two guys that are interested in nothing but bipartisanship and compromise...WTF.🤣🤣 2 guys....lmao Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.