Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Emails?


Recommended Posts

When then-FBI Director James Comey announced he was closing the Hillary Clinton email investigation for a second time just days before the 2016 election, he certified to Congress that his agency had “reviewed all of the communications” discovered on a personal laptop used by Clinton’s closest aide, Huma Abedin, and her husband, Anthony Weiner.

457867_5_.jpg
James Comey, above. Top photo: His certification to Congress just before Election Day clearing Hillary Clinton a second time. That certification is challenged by new reporting. 
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File
Top: AP Photo/Jon Elswick
 

At the time, many wondered how investigators managed over the course of one week to read the “hundreds of thousands” of emails residing on the machine, which had been a focus of a sex-crimes investigation of Weiner, a former Congressman.

Comey later told Congress that “thanks to the wizardry of our technology,” the FBI was able to eliminate the vast majority of messages as “duplicates” of emails they’d previously seen. Tireless agents, he claimed, then worked “night after night after night” to scrutinize the remaining material.

But virtually none of his account was true, a growing body of evidence reveals.

In fact, a technical glitch prevented FBI technicians from accurately comparing the new emails with the old emails. Only 3,077 of the 694,000 emails were directly reviewed for classified or incriminating information. Three FBI officials completed that work in a single 12-hour spurt the day before Comey again cleared Clinton of criminal charges.

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2018/08/22/despite_comey_assurance_vast_bulk_of_weiner_laptop_emails_never_examined.html

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
1 minute ago, Mainecat said:

Someone here explain what’s in the emails? 

From the sounds of it, it's everything on Trump and the Russia connection proving without a shadow of a doubt there was collusion. Also a pee tape and multiple recordings on Donny saying the N word along with actually video proof of him grabbing multiple pussies and sleeping with his daughter 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
2 minutes ago, Skidooski said:

From the sounds of it, it's everything on Trump and the Russia connection proving without a shadow of a doubt there was collusion. Also a pee tape and multiple recordings on Donny saying the N word along with actually video proof of him grabbing multiple pussies and sleeping with his daughter 

:bc:   :goodpost::true:

 

 

 

:lmao: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member

The State department is essentially an arm of the CIA.   Rather 2 things happened.  She sent classified information or she didn't do her job.

The entire reason Comey covered it up wasn't to protect Clinton, it was to protect Obama.  Obama was emailing her using an alias on the unsecured server.   Talk about incompetence.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, NaturallyAspirated said:

There's as much in Hillary's emails as there is in Trump's collusion.

Neal

BULLSHIT        the cunt let just about everyone arpund her handle information that she should not have.         oh yA.   thats ok cuz she never did sign the proper paperwork alowwing her to determine that..........                  gmafb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mainecat said:

Someone here explain what’s in the emails? 

The IG was answering Nunes questions about the emails they had looked at to this point and his statement that some of the emails found on the Carlos Danger laptop we're so classified that just telling Which agency they came from in open testimony would be a violation of secracy protocol.  Say it with me "Criminally Neglegent". Hillary could have and should have been charged.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why did the FBI sit on the laptop for a month before getting a warrant to see it?

Why did they certify the saw all emails, when they saw less than 1%?

Why did it take the NY FBI office going over heads to ensure it was investigated? (Besides the fact he knew what was on the laptop and didn't want to be the scapegoat)?

Just a few questions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...