Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Trump to Announce Carrier Plant Will Keep Jobs in U.S.


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Ebsell said:

I agree 100%. People went crazy over the auto bailout but very little was said about the banks. 

The banks and the auto industry aren't comparable. For the auto industry it's all the spin off jobs. The likes of GM and Chrysler really only design and assemble the cars. If they failed they would impact greatly and / or cause massive job losses and / or cause the businesses to go under for

the companies that manufacture all the parts that go into the cars - axles windshields body panels - everything

the companies that supply the raw materials to those parts manufacturers

the transport companies that deliver the raw materials to the parts manufacturers and then the parts to the assembly plants which are just in time deliveries so very frequent

the transport companies that deliver the cars to the dealers

the dealerships themselves

and so many more.

Edited by 02sled
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 1jkw said:

Not sure if the US tax rate was zero if you can compete with the low wage and work standards of other countries.

Pretty sure in the past GE and other companies have paid zero tax.

You cant and I have said this many times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, racer254 said:

So why to these company move the jobs overseas if this is just a small cost?  To constantly say a cost is "small" yet these companies still move the jobs to save $$$ doesn't really seem to coincide with each other.   So if the cost is small, why move?

Exactly. The cost of moving and setting up a net new operation could be in the 100's of $M's or even into the $B's. They don't spend that much just to save a LITTLE BIT. The ROI wouldn't be there. The savings they were looking at by moving would have been significant year over year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 02sled said:

The banks and the auto industry aren't comparable. For the auto industry it's all the spin off jobs. The likes of GM and Chrysler really only design and assemble the cars. If they failed they would impact greatly and / or cause massive job losses and / or cause the businesses to go under for

the companies that manufacture all the parts that go into the cars - axles windshields body panels - everything

the companies that supply the raw materials to those parts manufacturers

the transport companies that deliver the raw materials to the parts manufacturers and then the parts to the assembly plants which are just in time deliveries so very frequent

the transport companies that deliver the cars to the dealers

the dealerships themselves

and so many more.

For sure, much much bigger than the auto manu's.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 02sled said:

Exactly. The cost of moving and setting up a net new operation could be in the 100's of $M's or even into the $B's. They don't spend that much just to save a LITTLE BIT. The ROI wouldn't be there. The savings they were looking at by moving would have been significant year over year.

The point missed is that in comparison to the parent companies overall bottom line the cost was not that huge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mainecat said:

A US company with wages at $1,500,000.00 would see that drop to $93,000.00.

If US businesses paid zero taxes and zero healthcare they still cannot compete with 40 dollar a week wages.

Lets see, 1,500,000.00 vs 93,000.00 in wages with 10,000,000.00 in output from said operations.  What is the efficiency of the two operations?  You can kiss the low skilled high labour jobs away and try and focus on the high skilled ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 1jkw said:

The point missed is that in comparison to the parent companies overall bottom line the cost was not that huge.

Nothing missed. The impact to the bottom line would have definitely been significant. Business does not survive by spending $B's in relocation costs, setting up new facilities, establishing new supply chain logistics, hiring and training new staff, severance packages to old staff and so much more just to save a couple of $M. It doesn't fly economically. In todays world unless you are looking at a 2 or 3 year ROI it just doesn't happen. A business won't wait long to recover the money they spend anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the very least we will have that transparency like Obama promised. The media is crawling up his ass with a microscope over this deal. the media is going to dissect every shit he makes. just heard a report where the guy said he was going to hold off praise until he got all the facts.

This isn't some terrorist act where you can run off half cocked, and start throwing all kinds of bullshit out there.

 

 

 

Edited by Cold War
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Mainecat said:

Fund it with tariffs. People that live in the state are financing the business with higher taxes. Watch others line up for the same. You guys especially the cut taxes republicans are ok with this shit?

People making 50k per year, one thousand of them will contribute just a little bit more to the tax base then 10000 people on unemployment bennies and then welfare when they loise their home and the bennies run out. You are a fucking moron.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
2 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

fucking clown hasn't even reached office yet and the excuses for reneges and broken promises are flying. :lmao: 

Can you show where Trump claimed he would save ALL jobs and bring back ALL jobs lost?    Didn't think so SnoRider.  :taunt:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

fucking clown hasn't even reached office yet and the excuses for reneges and broken promises are flying. :lmao: 

Its amazing really. Not even a peep about the wall and this illegals

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
Just now, Mainecat said:

Its amazing really. Not even a peep about the wall and this illegals

Can't tackle it all at once. :lmao:Damn he isn't even POTUS yet and you guys are complaining that he isn't getting anything done. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Highmark said:

Can't tackle it all at once. :lmao:Damn he isn't even POTUS yet and you guys are complaining that he isn't getting anything done. 

Yup... everything will get done on day 1 and then he can sit back and do nothing for the remaining 1459 days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, if this is the best Trump can do with direct intervention, America is in trouble.  I'd like to see what his blanket plans are for companies across the board, because he can't spend the next 4 years running from company to company begging them to stay in the US.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha this shit is amazing. All you 2 faggots have time to do is come on this site and whine like a bunch of fucking babies to i dont know 100 of us grown ass adults who could care less. Find a damn hobby or get a job 

For fucks sake you guys are sorry as fuck... :lol:

 

Edited by Wildcat
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said:

Honestly, if this is the best Trump can do with direct intervention, America is in trouble.  I'd like to see what his blanket plans are for companies across the board, because he can't spend the next 4 years running from company to company begging them to stay in the US.

He neglects small businesses which make up 80% of the US companies.

Corporate welfare in your face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Wildcat said:

Haha this shit is amazing. All you 2 faggots have time to do is come on this site and whine like a bunch of fucking babies to i dont know 100 of us grown as adults who could care less. Find a damn hobby or get a job 

For fucks sake you guys are sorry as fuck... :lol:

 

Imagine you live in the state or town that gave away your tax dollars? Voters should have to approve something like this its their money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought he was lowering corp rates.  Does that not sound like a master plan to stimulate the economy?

 

American can then do their part in boycotting companies that leave.

Edited by ArcticCrusher
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mainecat said:

He neglects small businesses which make up 80% of the US companies.

Corporate welfare in your face.

Well to be fair, he hasn't had a chance to take office and lay out an actual plan yet.  We'll see what he comes up with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...