Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted August 21, 2023 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 21, 2023 5 minutes ago, Cold War said: Right. I’m sure even if you’re not a liberal lawyer you would not be taking on any cases that involve anything Trump. When the fuck does this ever happen? You can defend child molesters , shame and humiliate rape victims, but asking questions about a election??!!! Hard to believe how stupid people have become. Many of the people indicted are Trump's attorney's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold War Posted August 21, 2023 Share Posted August 21, 2023 11 minutes ago, Highmark said: Many of the people indicted are Trump's attorney's. It is all about instilling fear in Americans. How many middle class Republicans you figure would show up again at a protest? Look at these lengthy prison sentences. You would be a fool to risk your freedoms. Mass nets using phone location data. Your ass better not even be driving by a protest. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted August 21, 2023 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 21, 2023 8 minutes ago, Cold War said: It is all about instilling fear in Americans. How many middle class Republicans you figure would show up again at a protest? Look at these lengthy prison sentences. You would be a fool to risk your freedoms. Mass nets using phone location data. Your ass better not even be driving by a protest. They are making it clear....don't challenge election results or else. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted August 21, 2023 Share Posted August 21, 2023 1 minute ago, Highmark said: They are making it clear....don't challenge election results or else. That means the elections were rigged. Its the coverup. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted August 21, 2023 Share Posted August 21, 2023 54 minutes ago, ViperGTS/Z1 said: Him even running is confronting it...they are desperate to stop and remove him. Wonder why Lol, that isn't confronting shit. He didn't drain ANYTHING the last time around, but made it worse. As for the "wonder why" that is super easy. He is terrible for America. There are a few complete toolbags too blind to see that though and making sure the least common denominator doesn't ruin our country is what you take as desperate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted August 21, 2023 Share Posted August 21, 2023 17 minutes ago, Cold War said: It is all about instilling fear in Americans. How many middle class Republicans you figure would show up again at a protest? Look at these lengthy prison sentences. You would be a fool to risk your freedoms. Mass nets using phone location data. Your ass better not even be driving by a protest. Holy shit you have a warped version of what they're actually being charged with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold War Posted August 21, 2023 Share Posted August 21, 2023 17 minutes ago, akvanden said: Holy shit you have a warped version of what they're actually being charged with. Really? Protesters sToRmED our state capital with actual guns, not flags and cell phones. A year earlier. They weren’t even charged. Just keep telling yourself the government is looking out for you by saving you from these dangerous people. 🙄 My Gawd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted August 21, 2023 Share Posted August 21, 2023 8 minutes ago, Cold War said: Really? Protesters sToRmED our state capital with actual guns, not flags and cell phones. A year earlier. They weren’t even charged. Just keep telling yourself the government is looking out for you by saving you from these dangerous people. 🙄 My Gawd. Shall we pull up some of the actual charges and see if they just "showed up"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold War Posted August 21, 2023 Share Posted August 21, 2023 4 minutes ago, akvanden said: Shall we pull up some of the actual charges and see if they just "showed up"? You’re safe now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted August 21, 2023 Share Posted August 21, 2023 6 minutes ago, Cold War said: You’re safe now. Don't protest, you might be charged for entering the capitol when you actually didn't, vandalizing when you actually didn't, assault when you actually didn't, etc. Be scared. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted August 21, 2023 Share Posted August 21, 2023 I think the funny part of all this is the uncertainty of the strengths of the cases. I would think if you were going to go after an ex president you would have clear charges everyone could agree on. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold War Posted August 21, 2023 Share Posted August 21, 2023 1 minute ago, akvanden said: Don't protest, you might be charged for entering the capitol when you actually didn't, vandalizing when you actually didn't, assault when you actually didn't, etc. Be scared. They were slipping on the blood and vomit!!!!! American flags!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted August 21, 2023 Share Posted August 21, 2023 "Not even the appearance of impropriety..." When Delaware’s acting U.S. attorney David C. Weiss celebrated a fraud conviction in 2010, he was joined by a key partner in the case: Beau Biden, the state’s attorney general. Weiss worked with Joe Biden’s eldest son to hash out prosecution strategies. “We will continue to aggressively pursue all types of fraud in order to protect the public,” Weiss said in his part of a statement with Beau Biden on the fraud case. Today, that little-known history highlights the deep challenges Weiss faces as he pursues a newly recharged investigation into Beau’s brother, Hunter Biden, in a small state long politically dominated by their father. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkisNH Posted August 21, 2023 Share Posted August 21, 2023 15 hours ago, revkevsdi said: So, no links to legal experts, just your opinion and lawyers who take a paycheque from Trump yet the Trumpster fan club still believe he is innocent. Go read Mark Lavines pieces on each indictment.... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted August 21, 2023 Share Posted August 21, 2023 Every other witch hunt they tried on Trump failed miserably. With a track record like that why would anyone think this is any different? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted August 21, 2023 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 21, 2023 11 minutes ago, Anler said: Every other witch hunt they tried on Trump failed miserably. With a track record like that why would anyone think this is any different? Multiple impeachments and on to all this all this crap now. Just one long hissy fit 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Steve753 Posted August 21, 2023 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 21, 2023 20 minutes ago, Anler said: Every other witch hunt they tried on Trump failed miserably. With a track record like that why would anyone think this is any different? Trump could've used those witch hunts to his benefit, but instead he's proven he's unfit to be potus again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted August 21, 2023 Author Share Posted August 21, 2023 4 hours ago, Carlos Danger said: I think the funny part of all this is the uncertainty of the strengths of the cases. I would think if you were going to go after an ex president you would have clear charges everyone could agree on. Seems like the grand jury agreed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted August 21, 2023 Share Posted August 21, 2023 Just now, revkevsdi said: Seems like the grand jury agreed. You mean the indictment that was posted before the grand jury even heard the case? That grand jury? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted August 21, 2023 Author Share Posted August 21, 2023 5 hours ago, Highmark said: Many of the people indicted are Trump's attorney's. Who knew they were breaking the law which is why they were hiding their actions. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted August 21, 2023 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 21, 2023 38 minutes ago, revkevsdi said: Who knew they were breaking the law which is why they were hiding their actions. Yeah attorneys intentionally break the law all the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted August 21, 2023 Share Posted August 21, 2023 1 minute ago, Highmark said: Yeah attorneys intentionally break the law all the time. One for filing a lawsuit to look at the 150000 ballots for signature verification. That's why anyone with a brain knows the election was off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted August 21, 2023 Share Posted August 21, 2023 give doug a try. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted August 21, 2023 Share Posted August 21, 2023 i think what I find funny is the Georgia case was the one that the left wing media really hung their hats on as being the strongest. What the Bragg case was not good enough? 🤣 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted August 21, 2023 Share Posted August 21, 2023 Doug has always been on the ball. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.