the 24' election

[ZR800efi]

will they try it again ?

[Rod]

57 minutes ago, ZR800efi said:

will they try it again ?

Why not? Worked last time 

[ArcticCrusher]

They're doing it again in 22.

[sleepybrew]

you guys sound "un-american" . hahahahahaha

[ZR800efi]

Just now, sleepybrew said:

you guys sound "un-american" . hahahahahaha

1812 fucker. 

 

1-0. lol

[ArcticCrusher]

 

 

[Steve753]

Just now, ArcticCrusher said:

 

 

You would think she would've won in 16.

[ArcticCrusher]

1 minute ago, Steve753 said:

You would think she would've won in 16.

They tried.

[Steve753]

1 minute ago, ArcticCrusher said:

They tried.

Oh Trump would've won the popular vote you mean?

[Deephaven]

25 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

They tried.

How did they fail?

[Steve753]

4 minutes ago, Deephaven said:

How did they fail?

So everytime the democrats win its by cheating and vice versa.

[Bontz]

1 minute ago, Steve753 said:

So everytime the democrats win its by cheating and vice versa.

Well, that's the game the Democrats are playing ... Hillary has been pushing it for over a month.

[Steve753]

Just now, Bontz said:

Well, that's the game the Democrats are playing ... Hillary has been pushing it for over a month.

In his last debate with Hillary, Trump said if he didn't win he wouldnt accept the results. That's implying he thinks they would cheat.

[Deephaven]

I didn't question the cheating, just how it failed.  Damn sure there was cheatin.

[Steve753]

1 minute ago, Deephaven said:

I didn't question the cheating, just how it failed.  Damn sure there was cheatin.

6 million votes would be hard to hide wouldn't it?

Making up a Russian collusion story is a lot different than hiding votes

Edited November 7, 2022 by Steve753

[EvilBird]

Just now, Deephaven said:

I didn't question the cheating, just how it failed.  Damn sure there was cheatin.

They overestimated Trumps support the first time around no question. 

[Steve753]

Just now, EvilBird said:

They overestimated Trumps support the first time around no question. 

He lost the popular vote regardless.

[EvilBird]

Just now, Steve753 said:

He lost the popular vote regardless.

And ? 

does that make you feel better the more times you say it? 

[Steve753]

2 minutes ago, EvilBird said:

And ? 

does that make you feel better the more times you say it? 

Honestly don't care, but according to another poster from Canada it meant everything in the election up there. Funny how you conveniently overlooked that.

 

[Bontz]

3 minutes ago, Steve753 said:

Honestly don't care, but according to another poster from Canada it meant everything in the election up there. Funny how you conveniently overlooked that.

 

OTB ... kinda strange to say you don't care, yet you've got a post count on this topic that clearly shows otherwise 

[EvilBird]

2 minutes ago, Steve753 said:

Honestly don't care, but according to another poster from Canada it meant everything in the election up there. Funny how you conveniently overlooked that.

 

Didnt even see that post 

regardless popular vote currently doesn't get you elected in America so wgaf. 

[Steve753]

2 minutes ago, EvilBird said:

Didnt even see that post 

regardless popular vote currently doesn't get you elected in America so wgaf. 

No. But it helps.

[Steve753]

3 minutes ago, Bontz said:

OTB ... kinda strange to say you don't care, yet you've got a post count on this topic that clearly shows otherwise 

So you've got nothing to add you mean?

[ActionfigureJoe]

Hopefully they steal bigley. 

[Bontz]

5 minutes ago, Steve753 said:

So you've got nothing to add you mean?

What would you like me to add to the conversation?  That our voting process is a complete shit show, and there's room for major improvements to restore the public's faith in voting integrity?