Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Facebook dumped millions into swing states to steal the 2020 election


jtssrx

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, Mainecat said:

Another podcast moron.

Stating factual amounts and locations facebook spent money poss skirting election at law at best . But you ate ok with it as long as your guy won and continues to completely fuck up the border and the covid response and continue to foster hyper inflation and keep staking trillions on the debt pile . But I know I know he cares about the poor and working class lmfao . Guzzle guzzle 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The report is 1,000 pages, explains a bit more than $100,000 spent by Russia on Facebook. Check it out sometime (it doesn’t reference the steel dossier as it didn’t find it credible).

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/report_volume5.pdf

Remember the citizens United case? That’s why this is happening. 

“The case began after Citizens United, a conservative non-profit organization, sought to air and advertise a film critical of then Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton shortly before the 2008 Democratic primary elections. Advertising the film would have been a violation of the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, which prohibited any corporation, non-profit organization or labor union from making an "electioneering communication" within 30 days of a primary or 60 days of an election, or making any expenditure advocating the election or defeat of a candidate at any time. Citizens United challenged the constitutionality of this law, and its case reached the Supreme Court.”

“The ruling effectively freed labor unions, trust funds, and corporations to spend money on electioneering communications and to directly advocate for the election or defeat of candidates.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Mainecat said:

Another podcast moron.

You’re a fucking moron, Dan Bongino replaced Rush and is on the radio daily. He was also a new york police officer and a member of the secret service who was on the Obama security detail. 
 

you really are a stupid fucking cunt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Anler said:

Funny because Trump used all of the to win in 2016. Now you're all crying like babies about it. This is how elections are going to be going forward. 

 

pasted image 0.png

Trump used what in 2016?? Trump was outspent two to one by Hilary Clinton in 2016. 
 

Clinton's unsuccessful campaign ($768 million in spending) outspent Trump's successful one ($398 million) by nearly 2 to 1. The Democratic National Committee and left-leaning outside groups also outspent their Republican counterparts by considerable margins.

Edited by jtssrx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, akvanden said:

The report is 1,000 pages, explains a bit more than $100,000 spent by Russia on Facebook. Check it out sometime (it doesn’t reference the steel dossier as it didn’t find it credible).

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/report_volume5.pdf

Remember the citizens United case? That’s why this is happening. 

“The case began after Citizens United, a conservative non-profit organization, sought to air and advertise a film critical of then Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton shortly before the 2008 Democratic primary elections. Advertising the film would have been a violation of the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, which prohibited any corporation, non-profit organization or labor union from making an "electioneering communication" within 30 days of a primary or 60 days of an election, or making any expenditure advocating the election or defeat of a candidate at any time. Citizens United challenged the constitutionality of this law, and its case reached the Supreme Court.”

“The ruling effectively freed labor unions, trust funds, and corporations to spend money on electioneering communications and to directly advocate for the election or defeat of candidates.”

And after every airing they have to state by law what there group is .

Facebook knew this wanted to skirt the law so they called it a getting out the vote campain only they chose to only get out the vote in places they knew would help a old lifelong politician elected . Really who gives a fuck every one in washingtion is a pos and I wish the protesters would have taken every of them out and made every one after thing 5 times before making there next vote or push there next bill

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jtssrx said:

Trump used what in 2016?? Trump was outspent two to one by Hilary Clinton in 2016. 
 

Clinton's unsuccessful campaign ($768 million in spending) outspent Trump's successful one ($398 million) by nearly 2 to 1. The Democratic National Committee and left-leaning outside groups also outspent their Republican counterparts by considerable margins.

You're not accounting for super PACs money. Billions $$

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, hayward said:

used what?  

Facebook, Twitter, Instagram all had people in trumps campaign headquarters. Watch that movie. It's not a slam on trump, just how elections are going to use social media going forward. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
9 hours ago, akvanden said:

The report is 1,000 pages, explains a bit more than $100,000 spent by Russia on Facebook. Check it out sometime (it doesn’t reference the steel dossier as it didn’t find it credible).

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/report_volume5.pdf

Remember the citizens United case? That’s why this is happening. 

“The case began after Citizens United, a conservative non-profit organization, sought to air and advertise a film critical of then Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton shortly before the 2008 Democratic primary elections. Advertising the film would have been a violation of the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, which prohibited any corporation, non-profit organization or labor union from making an "electioneering communication" within 30 days of a primary or 60 days of an election, or making any expenditure advocating the election or defeat of a candidate at any time. Citizens United challenged the constitutionality of this law, and its case reached the Supreme Court.”

“The ruling effectively freed labor unions, trust funds, and corporations to spend money on electioneering communications and to directly advocate for the election or defeat of candidates.”

A redacted Senate report.  :lol:  

  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
3 minutes ago, Mainecat said:

Anyone here who thinks the election was stolen is a total moron…in fact your below a moron.

 

Are you talking about the 2016 election? 

Looks at Mainecat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Gold Member
15 minutes ago, akvanden said:

Yup, there’s some juicy tidbits in there. :thumbsup:

You still believe Russian Collusion ? 

:lol:

 

6 hours ago, Anler said:

Funny because Trump used all of the to win in 2016. Now you're all crying like babies about it. This is how elections are going to be going forward. 

 

pasted image 0.png

Netflix Documentary ? 100% Propaganda by corporate shills ? :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, EvilBird said:

You still believe Russian Collusion ? 

:lol:

 

Netflix Documentary ? 100% Propaganda by corporate shills ? :lol:

Not really. My take was that social media has a huge influence on elections and campaigns are going to be using them more going forward. Which they are. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Gold Member
Just now, Anler said:

Not really. My take was that social media has a huge influence on elections and campaigns are going to be using them more going forward. Which they are. 

Fair enough....I pay for Netflix. But the Documentary they make nowadays are a joke....nothing independent anymore it sucks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, EvilBird said:

Fair enough....I pay for Netflix. But the Documentary they make nowadays are a joke....nothing independent anymore it sucks

It was a little overly dramatic but that wasnt the message I got from it. Trump ran a pretty slick operation and pulled off the impossible. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Gold Member
8 minutes ago, Anler said:

It was a little overly dramatic but that wasnt the message I got from it. Trump ran a pretty slick operation and pulled off the impossible. 

Biggest upset ever for sure

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...