Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Discuss


Recommended Posts

  • Platinum Contributing Member

I wouldn't have a problem with more rules on mandatory compensation in wages/salary over stock.   I think that is where one of the big issues some see today with the uber wealthy.  While I don't support pay caps on CEO's I think some consideration should be given to pay minimum's.   

Part of the reason that's so prevalent today is low interest rates and growing stock values.   Makes sense to get paid in stock and borrow against low interest rates to support an extravagant lifestyle.  

Edited by Highmark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Gold Member
6 minutes ago, SkisNH said:

I like the Idea of either the fair tax http://www.fairtax.org or a flat tax...No deduction, no bullshit everyone pays 12.5% of their pay. The rich people will still largely fund the system but at least the recipient class will have some skin in the game. 

Exactly it should be a flat tax system. The rich find loop holes to not pay and the poor don’t pay a dime everyone should be paying a equal percentage rate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 800renegaderider said:

The richest 1% pay an effective federal income tax rate of 24.7%. That is a little more than the 19.3% rate paid by someone making an average of $75,000. And 1 out of 5 millionaires pays a lower rate than someone making $50,000 to $100,000.
 

https://americansfortaxfairness.org/tax-fairness-briefing-booklet/fact-sheet-taxing-wealthy-americans/

I could go through point by point on where this is just marxist propaganda but neither of us would change our minds...So I will address just (1) point for you to consider. In the link it calls for the capital gains rate to be the same as the income tax rate...The problem is.

  • Money that goes into the stock market has already been taxed at the ordinary income rate. Only the GAINS are taxed at capital gains.
  • The Market and the power of compounding interest has created nest eggs for every generation and raising the capital gains will only hurt investment and retirement.
  • Revenue to the Treasury has gone UP every time the capital gains rate has been lowered due to increased investment. 

Where I due agree is that if you hold a series 6 or 7 license for investing those Personal gains should be taxed as income / but not for the typical individual

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 800renegaderider said:

Exactly it should be a flat tax system. The rich find loop holes to not pay and the poor don’t pay a dime everyone should be paying a equal percentage rate.

The rich pay...believe me, they pay. If someone is in the top 1% making 600k they pay about 150k in federal income tax (using your numbers)...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Highmark said:

I wouldn't have a problem with more rules on mandatory compensation in wages/salary over stock.   I think that is where one of the big issues some see today with the uber wealthy.  While I don't support pay caps on CEO's I think some consideration should be given to pay minimum's.   

Part of the reason that's so prevalent today is low interest rates and growing stock values.   Makes sense to get paid in stock and borrow against low interest rates to support an extravagant lifestyle.  

There are many, many orgs that offer some amazing stock options and investment plans.  The problem is, so few take advantage.  Most of the companies offer quarterly financial advice/training so you know what the employer offers.  Still, just pathetic participation.

I don’t understand why…..and never will.  I guess if your father/mother never “bought into” financial advantages, it’s better to just complain on how so many more have more money than you do.  Gub’ment needs to step up!  ……AND WHY CANT I HAVE A NEW HOUSE, NEW CARS AND A FAMILY WORKING ON MINIMUM WAGE?!?!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Gold Member
9 minutes ago, SkisNH said:

The rich pay...believe me, they pay. If someone is in the top 1% making 600k they pay about 150k in federal income tax (using your numbers)...

How much did bezos pay in 2007,2011,2018

musk pay in 2018

How much is Peter thiel paying on his 5 billion Roth fortune 

the rich always find loop holes to not pay

Hell even my boss pays less rate than me and he is by no mean loaded he just plays the system.

Edited by 800renegaderider
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
Just now, 800renegaderider said:

How much did bezos pay in 2007,2011,2018

musk pay in pay in 2018

How much is Peter thiel paying on his 5 billion Roth fortune 

the rich always find loop holes to not pay

 

Some rich not all.   That's proven by IRS tax data.

I'd rather see some adjustments in compensation rules before "wealth taxes."  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 800renegaderider said:

How much did bezos pay in 2007,2011,2018

musk pay in 2018

How much is Peter thiel paying on his 5 billion Roth fortune 

the rich always find loop holes to not pay

 

the superrich get subsidized in many ways by being able to pay people to game the system.  the high income earners but not superrich are those that pay the highest percentages.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

There are many, many orgs that offer some amazing stock options and investment plans.  The problem is, so few take advantage.  Most of the companies offer quarterly financial advice/training so you know what the employer offers.  Still, just pathetic participation.

I don’t understand why…..and never will.  I guess if your father/mother never “bought into” financial advantages, it’s better to just complain on how so many more have more money than you do.  Gub’ment needs to step up!  ……AND WHY CANT I HAVE A NEW HOUSE, NEW CARS AND A FAMILY WORKING ON MINIMUM WAGE?!?!!

I learned early to go full on into stock investment programs at work. Most you can buy at 80-90% of actual value. You made money the day you bought them. And many went up over time. 
I paid a large chuck of my kids college through these investments.

:bc: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Angry ginger said:

the superrich get subsidized in many ways by being able to pay people to game the system.  the high income earners but not superrich are those that pay the highest percentages.  

 

 

I don’t know.  Everyone can do things because the “game” rules still apply to everyone even if they can’t get the biggest “wins”.  It’s just percentages. My accountants job was to keep me paying no more than 15%.  And that was done almost every year.  The price was audits which I passed all but one.  And I’m far from anything most would call “rich” (I think).

Even the lowest level earners can do something but, as long as they feel getting a big tax refund is “winning” well, I don’t know what to tell them.  I don’t see that chaging either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

There are many, many orgs that offer some amazing stock options and investment plans.  The problem is, so few take advantage.

Exactly, I have noticed this too.  I'm sure you have probably seen the inside numbers for many organizations.  We have a generous tuition reimbursement program, even better than the trendy companies like Target, Best Buy, etc.  I milked that program over 7 years for $56k, most of which is tax free.  The list of people utilizing that program was extremely small, given the size of the company.  As far as I know, no one gets turned down, just has to be an applicable program, at an accredited institution, and turn in the passing grades and the paid tuition bill.

My wife can buy stock at a 15% discount but we haven't done anything with that.  I've got a thing about holding large amounts of company stock (thanks Enron).  For me, they just pay the transaction fee and take it out of the check so no big deal there.
 

Max 401k --> max HSA --> max discounted stock purchases

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Gold Member
5 minutes ago, Highmark said:

Some rich not all.   That's proven by IRS tax data.

I'd rather see some adjustments in compensation rules before "wealth taxes."  

Like the article said 1 in 5 rich pay less than someone who makes 50-100k. I don’t think a “wealth tax” is a good idea I just think it need to be fair across the board.

 

7 minutes ago, Angry ginger said:

the superrich get subsidized in many ways by being able to pay people to game the system.  the high income earners but not superrich are those that pay the highest percentages.  

 

 

Everyone gets screwed beside the ultra rich and poor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Edmo said:

I learned early to go full on into stock investment programs at work. Most you can buy at 80-90% of actual value. You made money the day you bought them. And many went up over time. 
I paid a large chuck of my kids college through these investments.

:bc: 

The biggest no brained there is. I don’t see how some bungle that math during their orientation.  If your company offers it…YOU TAKE IT.  :dunno:

”We’ll match up to 10% of your pay, if you put it in the option plan.  It’s like an immediate 10% pay increase that builds to even more over time.”

”Nawww….I’m good”.  
 

7A2FDCC1-1D15-48B6-A54D-C87AD532960C.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, SkisNH said:

The rich pay...believe me, they pay. If someone is in the top 1% making 600k they pay about 150k in federal income tax (using your numbers)...

If youre an idiot. There are lots of ways to avoid income taxes. If you pay yourself or get paid $600k in payroll then you are an idiot and yeah you are going to pay a shitload in taxes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, teamgreen02 said:

Exactly, I have noticed this too.  I'm sure you have probably seen the inside numbers for many organizations.  We have a generous tuition reimbursement program, even better than the trendy companies like Target, Best Buy, etc.  I milked that program over 7 years for $56k, most of which is tax free.  The list of people utilizing that program was extremely small, given the size of the company.  As far as I know, no one gets turned down, just has to be an applicable program, at an accredited institution, and turn in the passing grades and the paid tuition bill.

My wife can buy stock at a 15% discount but we haven't done anything with that.  I've got a thing about holding large amounts of company stock (thanks Enron).  For me, they just pay the transaction fee and take it out of the check so no big deal there.
 

Max 401k --> max HSA --> max discounted stock purchases

Most I’ve seen have less than 30% participation.  Of that, less than 10% take advantage of half of the match and around 3% take full advantage.  My wife was given unreal stock options over the years….that some of her counterparts scoffed at.  I just never understood it.  It’s not a “scam” that the company that has decided you are worthy of pay want to reward you and share the success.

“They are just trying to keep more of their money!!!!”  WT…F?  :lol:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
10 minutes ago, 800renegaderider said:

Like the article said 1 in 5 rich pay less than someone who makes 50-100k. I don’t think a “wealth tax” is a good idea I just think it need to be fair across the board.

 

Everyone gets screwed beside the ultra rich and poor.

Not sure what the article is counting as "rich."   Top 1% or top .1%

What Ginger stated above is true.   Many are paying A LOT. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
13 minutes ago, Anler said:

If youre an idiot. There are lots of ways to avoid income taxes. If you pay yourself or get paid $600k in payroll then you are an idiot and yeah you are going to pay a shitload in taxes

Depends.   On S-Corps you can pay yourself zero and take distributions but the income taxes will be the same.   You just avoid some FICA which is not income taxes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is off target and Ima sound like an old geezer a bit but, these kids today are making HUGE mistakes with their financial futures.  Houses too big and expensive and $60-70k vehicles because they “can make money with the low interest rates by investing on their own with the savings!!”

Enjoy working til you can’t anymore then heading to the mailbox in the hopes the SS check is still coming.  Why?  Why are they doing this?????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Anler said:

If youre an idiot. There are lots of ways to avoid income taxes. If you pay yourself or get paid $600k in payroll then you are an idiot and yeah you are going to pay a shitload in taxes

please enlighten me, because I must not be a bright as you. How do I avoid "legally" not paying income tax. Yes, I can depreciate assets, yes I can expense stuff, but at the end of the day I get fucked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SkisNH said:

please enlighten me, because I must not be a bright as you. How do I avoid "legally" not paying income tax. Yes, I can depreciate assets, yes I can expense stuff, but at the end of the day I get fucked.

“Legally”.

You cannot.  You can just limit the theft….that’s about it.  A good accountant is worth every penny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SkisNH said:

please enlighten me, because I must not be a bright as you. How do I avoid "legally" not paying income tax. Yes, I can depreciate assets, yes I can expense stuff, but at the end of the day I get fucked.

Well I never said you can avoid paying all taxes but income taxes are the highest taxes. Wealthy people like Trump or Bezos, etc.. dont pay themselves $1 billion dollars a year on a paycheck. 

Trump made his money in real estate. That is a good way to mitigate income taxes is owning real estate. Then you mortgage the shit out of it and keep that loan tax free while the real estate pays the expenses and keeps your taxable income lower. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, 800renegaderider said:

Like the article said 1 in 5 rich pay less than someone who makes 50-100k. I don’t think a “wealth tax” is a good idea I just think it need to be fair across the board.

 

Everyone gets screwed beside the ultra rich and poor.

TBH i think middle class america does just fine within the system right now on a Fed level.  hell it's pretty easy for someone to be north of 200k a year and pay mid teen effective tax rate.  

A flat tax set high enough to generate the same revenue numbers as today would severely change that for them.  but i would agree it's "fair" that everyone pay.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

“Legally”.

You cannot.  You can just limit the theft….that’s about it.  A good accountant is worth every penny.

Tax attorney is worth every penny. Accountants love paying taxes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Angry ginger said:

TBH i think middle class america does just fine within the system right now on a Fed level.  hell it's pretty easy for someone to be north of 200k a year and pay mid teen effective tax rate.  

A flat tax set high enough to generate the same revenue numbers as today would severely change that for them.  but i would agree it's "fair" that everyone pay.  

I agree with this....I just want the billionaires to pay close to the same effective rate I did when I was making good money before I was destitute and poor and down on my luck and without a chance of ever getting back on top!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, f7ben said:

I agree with this....I just want the billionaires to pay close to the same effective rate I did when I was making good money before I was destitute and poor and down on my luck and without a chance of ever getting back on top!!!!

The data shows the top 1% as having the highest average income tax rate.  All we hear about are the exceptions, which need to be addressed in the tax code.

The other piece that is missing is property tax, sales tax, and state/local income tax.

Top 1% Top 5% Top 10% Top 25% Top 50% Bottom 50% All Taxpayers
Number of Returns 1,443,179 7,215,893 14,431,787 36,079,467 72,158,933 72,158,933 144,317,866
Adjusted Gross Income ($ millions) $2,420,025 $4,217,996 $5,511,117 $7,969,121 $10,221,814 $1,342,069 $11,563,883
Share of Total Adjusted Gross Income 20.9% 36.5% 47.7% 68.9% 88.4% 11.6% 100.0%
Income Taxes Paid ($ millions) 615,716 926,367 1,096,343 1,336,041 1,491,041 45,137 1,536,178
Share of Total Income Taxes Paid 40.1% 60.3% 71.4% 87.0% 97.1% 2.9% 100.0%
Income Split Point 540,009 217,913 151,935 87,044 43,614 43,614  
Average Tax Rate 25.4% 22.0% 19.9% 16.8% 14.6% 3.4% 13.3%
Average Income Taxes Paid $426,639 $128,379 $75,967 $37,031 $20,663 $626 $10,644

 

Half-of-taxpayers-pay-97-percent-of-federal-income-taxes-progressive-federal-income-tax-data-2021.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...