Boered Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 Tell us what you think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted December 15, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 15, 2016 Corruption exposed corruption Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toslow Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 how did corruption expose corruption? it was the main stream media that is corrupt imo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted December 15, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 15, 2016 6 minutes ago, toslow said: how did corruption expose corruption? it was the main stream media that is corrupt imo If we go with door #1 that has the Russians behind the hack then you have corruption (Putin / Russians) exposing corruption (Dem party / Hillary) Door #2 is that it was an inside job (corruption ?) Door #3...MC's favorite...is that the hacked emails were hacked or altered Door #4..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry ginger Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 clearly the corruptions the issue, sorry about her luck for getting caught whether that was the russians or not she made her own bed. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 5 minutes ago, Angry ginger said: clearly the corruptions the issue, sorry about her luck for getting caught whether that was the russians or not she made her own bed. X2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boered Posted December 15, 2016 Author Share Posted December 15, 2016 (edited) Lets look at this from a stand point of any and all corruption, not just Hillary and the alleged Russian hacking. Simple question really. Does it matter how it was exposed, and if so why does it matter? Edited December 15, 2016 by Boered . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 Well if you have nothing to hide... Why would you care if someone was reading your emails? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted December 16, 2016 Share Posted December 16, 2016 (edited) 7 hours ago, toslow said: how did corruption expose corruption? it was the main stream media that is corrupt imo The MSM is deff corrupt . they did all they could to hide her corruption and when they could not hide it they minimalized it . that is 1 among many reasons she lost Edited December 16, 2016 by Ez ryder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member Kivalo Posted December 16, 2016 Gold Member Share Posted December 16, 2016 The most important part of the equation is the fact that wikileaks et al time their info releases. They are manipulating outcomes. Right now its for the greater good but will it always stay that way? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted December 16, 2016 Share Posted December 16, 2016 It's not one or the other. Logic FAIL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted December 16, 2016 Share Posted December 16, 2016 8 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said: It's not one or the other. Logic FAIL It is for the purpose of this poll and thread. See, this is where you libs get all fucked up, you don't get to have your own answer to fit whatever talking point you embrace all the time. And this is a pretty simple and straight forward question. So, vote or don't vote. But nobody cares why you think there should be a third, fourth of fifth option and an *asterisk qualifying answer. C'mon man! You boys still aren't getting why you lost so bad, are you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boered Posted December 16, 2016 Author Share Posted December 16, 2016 43 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said: It's not one or the other. Logic FAIL The question does not ask you to pick one or the other, it is asking which matters more. You are saying they are equal. Stupid liberal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted December 16, 2016 Share Posted December 16, 2016 50 minutes ago, Kivalo said: The most important part of the equation is the fact that wikileaks et al time their info releases. They are manipulating outcomes. Right now its for the greater good but will it always stay that way? they did that because they know how the MSM works . they dump it all 1 day it is gone in 3 days max. u put a bit out let them spin a web then let them squirm with the new lye exposed . on and on . really only way to do it . and I don't care what side it is on if they are shit bags they are shit bags burn them in the public cuz sure shit the MSM will only do there job if it fits there agenda 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted December 16, 2016 Share Posted December 16, 2016 what was even better was watching the same sleazy people who less than a few yrs prior were gushing over wiki and there integrity for the truth trash them as unreliable hacks . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted December 16, 2016 Share Posted December 16, 2016 The thing about the Wiki leaks is none of the MSM has done any leg work on their content. The emails lay out a trail of donors and pay offs for services rendered that seem to just be left out hanging. The voters seemed to rightfully look at them as a case of corruption but the MSM has given the content of the emails a good leaving alone. Wiki Leaks, Dem staffer, Russians, Deep throat, what difference does the source of the leaks make if they check out to be true and corruption is uncovered. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted December 16, 2016 Share Posted December 16, 2016 18 minutes ago, Boered said: The question does not ask you to pick one or the other, it is asking which matters more. You are saying they are equal. Stupid liberal. Only stupid conservatives see everything in a black and white manner. Unfortunately reality and life doesn't work that way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member Kivalo Posted December 16, 2016 Gold Member Share Posted December 16, 2016 4 minutes ago, Carlos Danger said: The thing about the Wiki leaks is none of the MSM has done any leg work on their content. The emails lay out a trail of donors and pay offs for services rendered that seem to just be left out hanging. The voters seemed to rightfully look at them as a case of corruption but the MSM has given the content of the emails a good leaving alone. Wiki Leaks, Dem staffer, Russians, Deep throat, what difference does the source of the leaks make if they check out to be true and corruption is uncovered. Yep, the media has done nothing to even explore the implications of the emails beyond the circus created by their release. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted December 16, 2016 Share Posted December 16, 2016 38 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said: Only stupid conservatives see everything in a black and white manner. Unfortunately reality and life doesn't work that way. Poor Icemelt,, he's evolved onto an even more pathetic version of Mcliars "Independent" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boered Posted December 16, 2016 Author Share Posted December 16, 2016 44 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said: Only stupid conservatives see everything in a black and white manner. Unfortunately reality and life doesn't work that way. You cannot answer the question because you would have to admit that your narrative is flawed. Stupid liberal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted December 16, 2016 Share Posted December 16, 2016 44 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said: Only stupid conservatives see everything in a black and white manner. Unfortunately reality and life doesn't work that way. oh plz explain the situation in your own words to all us dumb asses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boered Posted December 16, 2016 Author Share Posted December 16, 2016 5 minutes ago, Ez ryder said: oh plz explain the situation in your own words to all us dumb asses. Ice is a moron. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted December 16, 2016 Share Posted December 16, 2016 I am sure he is searching the best of Chris Mathews for a week ass explanation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boered Posted December 16, 2016 Author Share Posted December 16, 2016 5 minutes ago, Ez ryder said: I am sure he is searching the best of Chris Mathews for a week ass explanation WGAS what the liberal troll is doing. Fuck him and his ilk, he can eat shit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted December 16, 2016 Share Posted December 16, 2016 9 hours ago, Boered said: WGAS what the liberal troll is doing. Fuck him and his ilk, he can eat shit. Ahhhh.....very eloquent. And true! This can go for the rest of this worlds bleeding heart idiotic librulz. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.