Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Youtube - FB & Twitter keep removing this vid


Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, Skidooski said:

Twitter, FakeBook and Youtube are yanking it

That's BS. Need to have the hot blonde WH press chic to report on this.

 

10 minutes ago, frenchy said:

everyone can rest easy now. Dripper and Ford are on the case!

Poor little Frenchman ... always so angry & miserable.

 

6 minutes ago, Angry ginger said:

2 of the most brilliant posters to ever grace the intrawebs.  :bc:  

RR.gif.e3fdbfb80eb3b138224a76af17347292.gif

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are they really removing it because I have seen it about 15 times today alone. IF they are removing it I would guess its probably due to the comments. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
1 minute ago, Anler said:

Are they really removing it because I have seen it about 15 times today alone. IF they are removing it I would guess its probably due to the comments. 

I've seen it go missing a couple times already today from friends that like to constantly forward shit to me

https://www.google.com/search?q=American+Doctors+Address+COVID-19+Misinformation+with+SCOTUS&rlz=1C1OKWM_enUS863US863&oq=American+doctors+ad&aqs=chrome.0.69i59j69i57j0l6.6144j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Anler said:

Are they really removing it because I have seen it about 15 times today alone. IF they are removing it I would guess its probably due to the comments. 

No clue ...but if this really works like a lot are saying ...WTF is going on?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Skidooski said:

One of my friends on Fakebook posted it several times to "flood facebook" with it. I was like wtf dude? LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
Just now, Anler said:

One of my friends on Fakebook posted it several times to "flood facebook" with it. I was like wtf dude? LOL

Weird shit people do! I've seen a couple people do that when they get censored by FB and it pisses them off so they just keep posting over and over again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ArcticCrusher said:

She has a track record with it.  The left just can't stand her.

 

https://heavy.com/news/2020/07/dr-stella-immanuel/

she’s perfect for you. :lol: 
 

She has claimed that gynecological problems like cysts and endometriosis are in fact caused by people having sex in their dreams with demons and witches.

She alleges alien DNA is currently used in medical treatments, saying: 'They're using all kinds of DNA, even alien DNA, to treat people.'

In a 2015 sermon she declared that the Illuminati are promoting a plan hatched by 'a witch' to destroy the world using abortion, gay marriage, and children's toys.

Immanuel claims the Magic 8-Ball toy is in fact a scheme to get children used to witchcraft. 'The 8-Ball was a psychic,' she said.

'There are people that are ruling this nation that are not even human,' Immanuel said, before launching into a conversation she had with a 'reptilian spirit' she described as 'half-human, half-ET.' 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
2 minutes ago, spin_dry said:

she’s perfect for you. :lol: 
 

She has claimed that gynecological problems like cysts and endometriosis are in fact caused by people having sex in their dreams with demons and witches.

She alleges alien DNA is currently used in medical treatments, saying: 'They're using all kinds of DNA, even alien DNA, to treat people.'

In a 2015 sermon she declared that the Illuminati are promoting a plan hatched by 'a witch' to destroy the world using abortion, gay marriage, and children's toys.

Immanuel claims the Magic 8-Ball toy is in fact a scheme to get children used to witchcraft. 'The 8-Ball was a psychic,' she said.

'There are people that are ruling this nation that are not even human,' Immanuel said, before launching into a conversation she had with a 'reptilian spirit' she described as 'half-human, half-ET.' 

That's some hardcore "Alternative" medicine there!!!  :lol: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, spin_dry said:

she’s perfect for you. :lol: 
 

She has claimed that gynecological problems like cysts and endometriosis are in fact caused by people having sex in their dreams with demons and witches.

She alleges alien DNA is currently used in medical treatments, saying: 'They're using all kinds of DNA, even alien DNA, to treat people.'

In a 2015 sermon she declared that the Illuminati are promoting a plan hatched by 'a witch' to destroy the world using abortion, gay marriage, and children's toys.

Immanuel claims the Magic 8-Ball toy is in fact a scheme to get children used to witchcraft. 'The 8-Ball was a psychic,' she said.

'There are people that are ruling this nation that are not even human,' Immanuel said, before launching into a conversation she had with a 'reptilian spirit' she described as 'half-human, half-ET.' 

It's much more than her moron.

 

 

 

Quote

Something is very strange here.

We’re not talking about a drug without a track record here. Hydroxychloroquine isn’t snake oil. It isn’t Hadacol. It’s been used for decades as an anti-malarial, and it’s commonly used to treat a myriad of ailments like lupus and rheumatoid arthritis.

And only very recently has anyone said hydroxychloroquine is dangerous. That’s why Dr. Immanuel says on the video that she was shocked to hear it isn’t safe.

Moreover, Dr. Immanuel isn’t some quack on a roadside somewhere. Doctors around the country have been prescribing HCQ to treat COVID-19. The Henry Ford Medical Foundation did a study of the drug among over 2,500 hospital patients and found that it cut death rates in half.

Treatment with hydroxychloroquine cut the death rate significantly in sick patients hospitalized with COVID-19 – and without heart-related side-effects, according to a new study published by Henry Ford Health System.

In a large-scale retrospective analysis of 2,541 patients hospitalized between March 10 and May 2, 2020 across the system’s six hospitals, the study found 13% of those treated with hydroxychloroquine alone died compared to 26.4% not treated with hydroxychloroquine. None of the patients had documented serious heart abnormalities; however, patients were monitored for a heart condition routinely pointed to as a reason to avoid the drug as a treatment for COVID-19.

The study was published today in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases, the peer-reviewed, open-access online publication of the International Society of Infectious Diseases (ISID.org).

Patients treated with hydroxychloroquine at Henry Ford met specific protocol criteria as outlined by the hospital system’s Division of Infectious Diseases. The vast majority received the drug soon after admission; 82% within 24 hours and 91% within 48 hours of admission. All patients in the study were 18 or over with a median age of 64 years; 51% were men and 56% African American.

“The findings have been highly analyzed and peer-reviewed,” said Dr. Marcus Zervos, division head of Infectious Disease for Henry Ford Health System, who co-authored the study with Henry Ford epidemiologist Samia Arshad. “We attribute our findings that differ from other studies to early treatment, and part of a combination of interventions that were done in supportive care of patients, including careful cardiac monitoring. Our dosing also differed from other studies not showing a benefit of the drug. And other studies are either not peer reviewed, have limited numbers of patients, different patient populations or other differences from our patients.”

Zervos said the potential for a surge in the fall or sooner, and infections continuing worldwide, show an urgency to identifying inexpensive and effective therapies and preventions.

“We’re glad to add to the scientific knowledge base on the role and how best to use therapies as we work around the world to provide insight,” he said. “Considered in the context of current studies on the use of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19, our results suggest that the drug may have an important role to play in reducing COVID-19 mortality.”

The study also found those treated with azithromycin alone or a combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin also fared slightly better than those not treated with the drugs, according to the Henry Ford data. The analysis found 22.4% of those treated only with azithromycin died, and 20.1% treated with a combination of azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine died, compared to 26.4% of patients dying who were not treated with either medication.

“Our analysis shows that using hydroxychloroquine helped saves lives,” said neurosurgeon Dr. Steven Kalkanis, CEO, Henry Ford Medical Group and Senior Vice President and Chief Academic Officer of Henry Ford Health System. “As doctors and scientists, we look to the data for insight. And the data here is clear that there was benefit to using the drug as a treatment for sick, hospitalized patients.”

The Henry Ford study discouraged the use of HCQ in outpatient settings. Other doctors disagree as Dr. Immanuel does, arguing it’s even more effective when used as a prophylactic or a first-resort to patients testing positive for the virus.

Among them is Yale epidemiology professor Harvey Risch, who last week penned an op-ed in Newsweek touting HCQ as the key to beating COVID-19. Risch is certainly no crank; his placement at Yale ought to give him some credibility with the establishment types who reflexively dismiss as “misinformation” any claims that HCQ might work against the virus.

Physicians who have been using these medications in the face of widespread skepticism have been truly heroic. They have done what the science shows is best for their patients, often at great personal risk. I myself know of two doctors who have saved the lives of hundreds of patients with these medications, but are now fighting state medical boards to save their licenses and reputations. The cases against them are completely without scientific merit.

Why has hydroxychloroquine been disregarded?

First, as all know, the medication has become highly politicized. For many, it is viewed as a marker of political identity, on both sides of the political spectrum. Nobody needs me to remind them that this is not how medicine should proceed. We must judge this medication strictly on the science. When doctors graduate from medical school, they formally promise to make the health and life of the patient their first consideration, without biases of race, religion, nationality, social standing—or political affiliation. Lives must come first.

Second, the drug has not been used properly in many studies. Hydroxychloroquine has shown major success when used early in high-risk people but, as one would expect for an antiviral, much less success when used late in the disease course. Even so, it has demonstrated significant benefit in large hospital studies in Michigan and New York City when started within the first 24 to 48 hours after admission.

In fact, as inexpensive, oral and widely available medications, and a nutritional supplement, the combination of hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin or doxycycline, and zinc are well-suited for early treatment in the outpatient setting. The combination should be prescribed in high-risk patients immediately upon clinical suspicion of COVID-19 disease, without waiting for results of testing. Delays in waiting before starting the medications can reduce their efficacy.

Third, concerns have been raised by the FDA and others about risks of cardiac arrhythmia, especially when hydroxychloroquine is given in combination with azithromycin. The FDA based its comments on data in its FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. This reporting system captured up to a thousand cases of arrhythmias attributed to hydroxychloroquine use. In fact, the number is likely higher than that, since the reporting system, which requires physicians or patients to initiate contact with the FDA, appreciably undercounts drug side effects.

But what the FDA did not announce is that these adverse events were generated from tens of millions of patient uses of hydroxychloroquine for long periods of time, often for the chronic treatment of lupus or rheumatoid arthritis. Even if the true rates of arrhythmia are ten-fold higher than those reported, the harms would be minuscule compared to the mortality occurring right now in inadequately treated high-risk COVID-19 patients. This fact is proven by an Oxford University study of more than 320,000 older patients taking both hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, who had arrhythmia excess death rates of less than 9/100,000 users, as I discuss in my May 27 paper cited above. A new paper in the American Journal of Medicine by established cardiologists around the world fully agrees with this.

We’re certainly not virologists or physicians here at The Hayride, but we are connoisseurs and purveyors of information and debate. There are credible experts in the medical field who are active in using HCQ to fight COVID-19; this is unquestionably true, and there is scholarship available to at least suggest it is effective.

But Big Tech appears determined to quash a legitimate medical debate over an inexpensive, time-tested medication to such an extent that doctors are not allowed to even talk about whether hydroxychloroquine can cure COVID-19 patients without it being taken down by non-doctors as “misinformation.”

Something is very, very wrong here. It doesn’t smell right. It certainly doesn’t smell American. We can spin up all kinds of theories about why this is happening, but at the end of the day those theories don’t really matter. The suppression of information about a potential treatment for COVID-19 is creepy, it’s wrong and it needs to stop.

 
 

 

 

https://thehayride.com/2020/07/the-suppression-of-americas-frontline-doctors-is-the-creepiest-thing-weve-ever-seen/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Skidooski said:

The drug isn't harming anyone right? There are reports of it helping so why all the resistance to it?  :dunno: 

Neither is the virus really unless you're old or sick.  That's the bigger question to be answered.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

I can post up numerous studies from around the world showing it’s a waste of time. Large scale studies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...