Sleepr2 Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 2 hours ago, XC.Morrison said: I don’t know about that. Historically speaking, Presidents named Clinton have all had pretty decent fiscal records. LOL! The myth of the “ Clinton “ surplus. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XC.Morrison Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 (edited) 16 minutes ago, Sleepr2 said: LOL! The myth of the “ Clinton “ surplus. Oh, just great, now we've got a math denier to contend with. I'ma send Yang over to school ya up a lil Edited February 11, 2020 by XC.Morrison 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 The oil companies got their money’s worth. Even after they admit they lied to the sheeple, the sheeple still believe them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 7 hours ago, XC.Morrison said: Oh, just great, now we've got a math denier to contend with. I'ma send Yang over to school ya up a lil LOL! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted February 12, 2020 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted February 12, 2020 16 hours ago, revkevsdi said: The oil companies got their money’s worth. Even after they admit they lied to the sheeple, the sheeple still believe them. Hey, is styrofoam a petroleum based material? Like what they make foam coolers out of? Asking for a friend Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
washedupmxer Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 Barb's passion to believe no matter what is beyond religion levels Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 21 hours ago, washedupmxer said: It's funny because kneel has used the 97% many times The sheep graphic was perfect Can you quote it? Many times should be easy to post up a few times I did... Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
washedupmxer Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 5 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: Can you quote it? Many times should be easy to post up a few times I did... Neal That's about as clear as mud How about we start with 97% of scientists agree. True or false? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted February 12, 2020 Author Share Posted February 12, 2020 https://www.thepostmillennial.com/trudeau-government-pays-media-to-write-climate-change-news-articles/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 32 minutes ago, washedupmxer said: That's about as clear as mud How about we start with 97% of scientists agree. True or false? Post up a quote, then I'll answer you. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted February 12, 2020 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted February 12, 2020 21 hours ago, XC.Morrison said: Even worse they think the democrats are perpetrating an elaborate hoax. So I’m to believe that same people too incompetent to run a caucus were at the same time able to co-opt the worlds’ scientists into promoting and thereby masterminding a grand global Orwellian deception all so they could seize power which they haven’t. Nevermind the fact that any power advantage that could somehow supposedly be attained by enacting climate policy could just as easily be enacted at the same level or greater by opposing Republicans thereby nullifying any advantage. Hell, Newt and Nancy used to have some agreement on the subject before the dumbing down of America began in earnest. Its easy. You just give them billions in grant money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
washedupmxer Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 3 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: Post up a quote, then I'll answer you. Neal Not that interested I knew a simple true or false was too much to ask. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 https://insideclimatenews.org/news/23102019/exxon-scientists-climate-research-testify-congess-denial "I cannot see into Exxon management's heart," said physicist Martin Hoffert, describing his distress at the company's newspaper ads in the 1990s contradicting the science on fossil fuel emissions' link to global warming. That work was his focus when he was a consultant to the company from 1981 to 1987. "Whatever its intent—willful ignorance, stymying an effective response to preserve quarterly profits, or simply an incomprehensible refusal to incorporate their own world-class research and results into their business plans," Hoffert said, "what they did was wrong. They deliberately created doubt when their internal research confirmed how serious a threat it was." The scientists' work for Exxon was featured in an award-winning 2015 investigation by InsideClimate News that explored the company's shift from climate research to climate denial and was mentioned in a video played as the hearing opened. "In order to understand and confront the crisis we are facing, we must recognize the disastrous deception that brought us to the brink," committee chairman Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) said. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), who has made climate change one of her signature issues as co-sponsor of Green New Deal legislation, showed a slide of a scientific chart produced by Exxon scientists. A 1982 Exxon report titled "CO2 Greenhouse Effect: A Technical Review" included this chart, which shows projections for global temperature rise as the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere increases. Its projections for 2019 are very close to today's conditions. "In 1982—seven years before I was even born—Exxon accurately predicted that by this year, 2019, the Earth would hit a carbon dioxide concentration of 415 parts per million and a temperature increase of 1 degree Celsius," said Ocasio-Cortez. "Dr. Hoffert, is that correct?" "We were excellent scientists," Hoffert responded. Climate Policies Gain Traction on Capitol Hill What Exxon knew, and when the company knew it, will be crucial in the New York trial, where the state attorney general is arguing that the oil company defrauded investors by misleading them about the risks it faces from future climate regulations. It also may prove to be important in shaping policy in Washington. Although the hearing did not focus on any legislative proposals to address climate change, the fact that they are being discussed on Capitol Hill was made clear by Republicans on the committee, who used their turns to bash proposals for a Green New Deal and carbon taxes. For the Sheeple. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 2 minutes ago, revkevsdi said: https://insideclimatenews.org/news/23102019/exxon-scientists-climate-research-testify-congess-denial "I cannot see into Exxon management's heart," said physicist Martin Hoffert, describing his distress at the company's newspaper ads in the 1990s contradicting the science on fossil fuel emissions' link to global warming. That work was his focus when he was a consultant to the company from 1981 to 1987. "Whatever its intent—willful ignorance, stymying an effective response to preserve quarterly profits, or simply an incomprehensible refusal to incorporate their own world-class research and results into their business plans," Hoffert said, "what they did was wrong. They deliberately created doubt when their internal research confirmed how serious a threat it was." The scientists' work for Exxon was featured in an award-winning 2015 investigation by InsideClimate News that explored the company's shift from climate research to climate denial and was mentioned in a video played as the hearing opened. "In order to understand and confront the crisis we are facing, we must recognize the disastrous deception that brought us to the brink," committee chairman Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) said. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), who has made climate change one of her signature issues as co-sponsor of Green New Deal legislation, showed a slide of a scientific chart produced by Exxon scientists. A 1982 Exxon report titled "CO2 Greenhouse Effect: A Technical Review" included this chart, which shows projections for global temperature rise as the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere increases. Its projections for 2019 are very close to today's conditions. "In 1982—seven years before I was even born—Exxon accurately predicted that by this year, 2019, the Earth would hit a carbon dioxide concentration of 415 parts per million and a temperature increase of 1 degree Celsius," said Ocasio-Cortez. "Dr. Hoffert, is that correct?" "We were excellent scientists," Hoffert responded. Climate Policies Gain Traction on Capitol Hill What Exxon knew, and when the company knew it, will be crucial in the New York trial, where the state attorney general is arguing that the oil company defrauded investors by misleading them about the risks it faces from future climate regulations. It also may prove to be important in shaping policy in Washington. Although the hearing did not focus on any legislative proposals to address climate change, the fact that they are being discussed on Capitol Hill was made clear by Republicans on the committee, who used their turns to bash proposals for a Green New Deal and carbon taxes. For the Sheeple. So tell us again what poly styrene is derived from. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
washedupmxer Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 Posts an op that sites aoc and some other Dem rep Demands credibility! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 2 minutes ago, AKIQPilot said: So tell us again what poly styrene is derived from. What does that have to do with the topic? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 Just now, revkevsdi said: What does that have to do with the topic? Is my question to difficult for you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 (edited) “You don’t believe you’re going to die from climate change bro??? You’re a pussy ass bitch!!!” — kevvyboomboom Edited February 12, 2020 by ACE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted February 12, 2020 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted February 12, 2020 4 minutes ago, revkevsdi said: What does that have to do with the topic? whats it like being a fraud?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 7 minutes ago, AKIQPilot said: Is my question to difficult for you? Please explain its' relevance to Exxon hiding their climate change research and actively funding denial of their own research. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 1 minute ago, Rigid1 said: whats it like being a fraud?? Ask your friend Zambo or look in the mirror. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
washedupmxer Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 #teamkneel You okay being in the same team with this guy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 2 minutes ago, revkevsdi said: Please explain its' relevance to Exxon hiding their climate change research and actively funding denial of their own research. Post all the old Exxon conspiracy BS you want. Still doesn't change the fact that you are a fraud and a hypocrite. Exxon produces hydrocarbons that you use to pollute the world and line your pockets. You are a fraud. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted February 12, 2020 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted February 12, 2020 4 minutes ago, revkevsdi said: Ask your friend Zambo or look in the mirror. Ooops... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 Poor Pussy ass bitch. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.