Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted November 22, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 22, 2019 12 hours ago, Mileage Psycho said: Our mentally defective president in all likelyhood will be impeached, the Senate will vote in his favor. Cool so we can do the same to Pence and BOOM, a Dem is POTUS again...YAY!!!!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted November 22, 2019 Share Posted November 22, 2019 13 minutes ago, Skidooski said: Cool so we can do the same to Pence and BOOM, a Dem is POTUS again...YAY!!!!!!!!! No. No! That’s not how it works!!! The runner up from the last election takes over!!!!!!!! I’m sure of it!!!!! IMPEACH!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted November 22, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 22, 2019 1 minute ago, Zambroski said: No. No! That’s not how it works!!! The runner up from the last election takes over!!!!!!!! I’m sure of it!!!!! IMPEACH!!!!!! So Trump comes back as POTUS because some of these fools still say Hillary won Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted November 22, 2019 Share Posted November 22, 2019 Just now, Skidooski said: So Trump comes back as POTUS because some of these fools still say Hillary won Ummmm.....well......ummmm.......Get rid of the electoral college!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted November 22, 2019 Share Posted November 22, 2019 ....it’s all really pretty easily, circular logic actually. Sort of. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted November 22, 2019 Share Posted November 22, 2019 1 hour ago, Zambroski said: No. No! That’s not how it works!!! The runner up from the last election takes over!!!!!!!! I’m sure of it!!!!! IMPEACH!!!!!! There are many “ woke “ leftists that believe that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted November 22, 2019 Share Posted November 22, 2019 15 hours ago, Mileage Psycho said: Our mentally defective president in all likelyhood will be impeached, the Senate will vote in his favor. So who’s more retarded, The people going forward with impeachment knowing trump isn’t guilty, or the people who acquit him because he’s not guilty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mileage Psycho Posted November 23, 2019 Share Posted November 23, 2019 On 11/21/2019 at 6:20 PM, BOHICA said: Senate will rule on the evidence and trump will win a second term if the Dems continue this on. On 11/21/2019 at 8:32 PM, Ez ryder said: only after they have there own little show and call there own witnesses . oh that should be real good entertanment . do you think the media will cover any of it lmfao . love watching people dig there own grave with a shovel glued to there hands Virginia, Kentucky (Trump beats HC by 30 points), Louisiana (Trump beats HC by 19.7 points) At the 1:22 mark: "you can't let that happen to me" Oh well they let it happen https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAvkHkWINaI Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XCR1250 Posted November 23, 2019 Share Posted November 23, 2019 TRUMP IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY Published 21 hours ago In Trump impeachment trial, Senate Republicans could turn tables on Dems By Brooke Singman | Fox News Facebook Twitter Flipboard Comments Print Email close Trump, supporters in Congress may be coming to terms with Senate impeachment trial House Democrats are entering what may be the final phase of their impeachment inquiry, after wrapping up a spree of hearings where witnesses tied top officials -- including President Trump -- to efforts to pressure Ukraine on political investigations while military aid was being withheld. But the tables could turn, should the House approve impeachment articles and trigger a trial in the Republican-controlled Senate. There, Trump’s allies are already indicating they will look more closely at allegations involving Democrats. "Frankly, I want a trial," Trump declared Friday on “Fox & Friends.” TRUMP CALLS FOR SENATE TRIAL, SEEKS WHISTLEBLOWER AND SCHIFF AS IMPEACHMENT WITNESSES There’s a reason for that. Democrats have controlled everything during marathon proceedings in the House, frustrating GOP attempts to call witnesses pertaining to the matters Trump wanted Ukraine to investigate -- specifically, the Bidens’ business dealings in that country and Kiev’s alleged interference in the 2016 election. But that changes on the Senate side, where Republicans have the majority and Trump allies chair key committees. Already, they’ve signaled their interest in exploring issues that House Democrats glossed over during their hearings. On Thursday, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., penned a letter to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo requesting the release of any documents related to contacts between former Vice President Joe Biden and former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, and to a meeting between son Hunter Biden’s business partner and former Secretary of State John Kerry. Video This pertains to questions surrounding the elder Biden’s role in pressing for the ouster of a Ukrainian prosecutor who had been investigating the natural gas firm Burisma, where Hunter Biden served on the board. Biden denies any wrongdoing, but Republicans have pressed for details throughout the impeachment process, in a bid to show that even though Trump’s pressure campaign on Kiev triggered the impeachment inquiry, his concern was legitimate. On the House side, Republicans likewise encountered challenges digging into allegations of Ukraine interference in the 2016 election. While Trump has sought to press an unsupported theory that Ukraine was tied to Democratic National Committee hacking, GOP lawmakers have sought details on other issues that are more grounded in published reports -- like whether former DNC consultant Alexandra Chalupa was improperly digging up dirt on Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and others with Ukraine’s help at the time. Democrats did not grant GOP requests to call Biden's son Hunter, Chalupa and others on the House side. But while it’s unclear if Senate Republicans will at least attempt to call these and other witnesses, high-ranking members are showing their early interest in exploring the issues. Aside from the Graham letter, Senate Homeland Security Committee Chairman Ron Johnson, R-Wisc., and Finance Committee Chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, have penned a letter to the head of the National Archives and Records Administration to request records of multiple White House meetings that took place in 2016 involving Obama administration officials, Ukrainian government representatives and Democratic National Committee officials. GRAHAM DEMANDS DOCUMENTS ON UKRAINE, BIDENS, OBAMA ADMINISTRATION FROM 2016 Johnson and Grassley wrote that during a meeting in 2016, officials “brought up investigations relating to Burisma Holdings.” The senators added that a Ukrainian political officer working in the Ukraine Embassy in Washington said U.S. officials in that meeting asked that "Kiev drop the Burisma probe and allow the FBI to take it over.” They added that White House records revealed that Chalupa had attended “numerous meetings at the White House, including one event with President Obama.” The new requests from Senate Republicans come as the House ended its series of scheduled hearings on Thursday. The Intelligence Committee could announce additional hearings and depositions, but at this time, nothing has been scheduled. The committee may now write and transmit its report to the House Judiciary Committee, which could begin writing articles of impeachment ahead of a floor vote. “What the House ends up passing will drive a lot of what we end up doing over here,” a senior Republican aide familiar with the ongoing discussions told Fox News Friday. The aide told Fox News that the White House made a “positive” and “significant” development this week, as officials indicated “what they want” for the trial. In the Senate trial, three separate parties have input to how it will play out: Senate Republicans, Senate Democrats and the White House. “It is impossible for us to come up with contours for impeachment without input from the White House,” the aide said. “Their input is a very positive step so we can try to control this as much as possible.” The White House, on Thursday, signaled that they would like a Senate trial to last no longer than two weeks. The impeachment of former President Bill Clinton lasted for six weeks. Video “We all want speedy,” the aide said. “This is the first indication the White House has given and that’s a positive — before it was radio silence from them, and now they’re starting to indicate what they want this thing to look like.” The aide explained that the Senate, once they receive articles of impeachment, will begin working on two resolutions — one that governs the timeline of the trial, and the other that sets up witnesses for closed-door depositions, as well as which witness will be required to testify on the stand. The aide explained that the resolutions are “significant,” noting that they will “be the main avenue that evidence is admitted.” The aide suggested that Republican senators like Graham, Grassley and Johnson could be attempting to help “shape” the witness list and the trial. Video A senior administration official, though, claimed Friday there’s “ample reasons” for the Senate to simply dismiss the case – though GOP senators have indicated that’s unlikely to happen. Yet the official still maintained it’s “100 percent to our advantage to have [a] full trial” in the Senate. Meanwhile, Rep. Chris Stewart, R-Utah, said sending articles of impeachment to the Senate was "good news." “Everyone knows what they’re going to do next. They’re going to impeach the president and send it onto the Senate, but that is the good news. That’s good news,” Stewart said. “In the U.S. Senate, there won’t be any secret testimony or dishonest leadership … or to deny a defense.” He added: “So we’ll finally be able to get to the truth.” Stewart went on to list several witnesses he hoped the Senate would call to testify, including the whistleblower, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, Hunter Biden, Burisma board member Devon Archer, Chalupa, and Fusion GPS researcher Nellie Ohr. And the president, himself, seems to be welcoming the trial as well. “There’s nothing there,” Trump said Friday during an interview with “Fox & Friends,” saying “there should never be an impeachment,” and echoing GOP requests for the whistleblower, Schiff and Hunter Biden to appear as witnesses. At the center of the impeachment inquiry, which began in September, is Trump’s July 25 phone call with Kiev. That call prompted the whistleblower complaint to the intelligence community inspector general, and in turn, the impeachment inquiry in the House. Trump challenged the accuracy of the complaint, though the transcript released by the White House did support the core allegations that he pressed for politically related investigations. The president’s request came after millions in U.S. military aid to Ukraine had been frozen, which Democrats and witnesses have claimed shows a "quid pro quo" arrangement. Trump denies any wrongdoing. Brooke Singman is a Politics Reporter for Fox News. Follow her on Twitter at @brookefoxnews. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted November 23, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 23, 2019 Why won't he let them testify? White House keeps Democrats from critical witnesses - https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/471745-white-house-keeps-democrats-from-critical-witnesses Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member BOHICA Posted November 23, 2019 Author Gold Member Share Posted November 23, 2019 34 minutes ago, Jimmy Snacks said: Why won't he let them testify? White House keeps Democrats from critical witnesses - https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/471745-white-house-keeps-democrats-from-critical-witnesses Sondland said Trump told him directly that he wanted “nothing from Ukraine, wanted no quid pro quo”. Ukraine got the aid money for nothing. black and white, and cut and dry. Why do the others even need to testify after Sondland testified. He cleared it up for any of those with a brain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted November 23, 2019 Share Posted November 23, 2019 3 hours ago, XCR1250 said: TRUMP IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY Published 21 hours ago In Trump impeachment trial, Senate Republicans could turn tables on Dems By Brooke Singman | Fox News Facebook Twitter Flipboard Comments Print Email close Trump, supporters in Congress may be coming to terms with Senate impeachment trial House Democrats are entering what may be the final phase of their impeachment inquiry, after wrapping up a spree of hearings where witnesses tied top officials -- including President Trump -- to efforts to pressure Ukraine on political investigations while military aid was being withheld. But the tables could turn, should the House approve impeachment articles and trigger a trial in the Republican-controlled Senate. There, Trump’s allies are already indicating they will look more closely at allegations involving Democrats. "Frankly, I want a trial," Trump declared Friday on “Fox & Friends.” TRUMP CALLS FOR SENATE TRIAL, SEEKS WHISTLEBLOWER AND SCHIFF AS IMPEACHMENT WITNESSES There’s a reason for that. Democrats have controlled everything during marathon proceedings in the House, frustrating GOP attempts to call witnesses pertaining to the matters Trump wanted Ukraine to investigate -- specifically, the Bidens’ business dealings in that country and Kiev’s alleged interference in the 2016 election. But that changes on the Senate side, where Republicans have the majority and Trump allies chair key committees. Already, they’ve signaled their interest in exploring issues that House Democrats glossed over during their hearings. On Thursday, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., penned a letter to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo requesting the release of any documents related to contacts between former Vice President Joe Biden and former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, and to a meeting between son Hunter Biden’s business partner and former Secretary of State John Kerry. Video This pertains to questions surrounding the elder Biden’s role in pressing for the ouster of a Ukrainian prosecutor who had been investigating the natural gas firm Burisma, where Hunter Biden served on the board. Biden denies any wrongdoing, but Republicans have pressed for details throughout the impeachment process, in a bid to show that even though Trump’s pressure campaign on Kiev triggered the impeachment inquiry, his concern was legitimate. On the House side, Republicans likewise encountered challenges digging into allegations of Ukraine interference in the 2016 election. While Trump has sought to press an unsupported theory that Ukraine was tied to Democratic National Committee hacking, GOP lawmakers have sought details on other issues that are more grounded in published reports -- like whether former DNC consultant Alexandra Chalupa was improperly digging up dirt on Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and others with Ukraine’s help at the time. Democrats did not grant GOP requests to call Biden's son Hunter, Chalupa and others on the House side. But while it’s unclear if Senate Republicans will at least attempt to call these and other witnesses, high-ranking members are showing their early interest in exploring the issues. Aside from the Graham letter, Senate Homeland Security Committee Chairman Ron Johnson, R-Wisc., and Finance Committee Chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, have penned a letter to the head of the National Archives and Records Administration to request records of multiple White House meetings that took place in 2016 involving Obama administration officials, Ukrainian government representatives and Democratic National Committee officials. GRAHAM DEMANDS DOCUMENTS ON UKRAINE, BIDENS, OBAMA ADMINISTRATION FROM 2016 Johnson and Grassley wrote that during a meeting in 2016, officials “brought up investigations relating to Burisma Holdings.” The senators added that a Ukrainian political officer working in the Ukraine Embassy in Washington said U.S. officials in that meeting asked that "Kiev drop the Burisma probe and allow the FBI to take it over.” They added that White House records revealed that Chalupa had attended “numerous meetings at the White House, including one event with President Obama.” The new requests from Senate Republicans come as the House ended its series of scheduled hearings on Thursday. The Intelligence Committee could announce additional hearings and depositions, but at this time, nothing has been scheduled. The committee may now write and transmit its report to the House Judiciary Committee, which could begin writing articles of impeachment ahead of a floor vote. “What the House ends up passing will drive a lot of what we end up doing over here,” a senior Republican aide familiar with the ongoing discussions told Fox News Friday. The aide told Fox News that the White House made a “positive” and “significant” development this week, as officials indicated “what they want” for the trial. In the Senate trial, three separate parties have input to how it will play out: Senate Republicans, Senate Democrats and the White House. “It is impossible for us to come up with contours for impeachment without input from the White House,” the aide said. “Their input is a very positive step so we can try to control this as much as possible.” The White House, on Thursday, signaled that they would like a Senate trial to last no longer than two weeks. The impeachment of former President Bill Clinton lasted for six weeks. Video “We all want speedy,” the aide said. “This is the first indication the White House has given and that’s a positive — before it was radio silence from them, and now they’re starting to indicate what they want this thing to look like.” The aide explained that the Senate, once they receive articles of impeachment, will begin working on two resolutions — one that governs the timeline of the trial, and the other that sets up witnesses for closed-door depositions, as well as which witness will be required to testify on the stand. The aide explained that the resolutions are “significant,” noting that they will “be the main avenue that evidence is admitted.” The aide suggested that Republican senators like Graham, Grassley and Johnson could be attempting to help “shape” the witness list and the trial. Video A senior administration official, though, claimed Friday there’s “ample reasons” for the Senate to simply dismiss the case – though GOP senators have indicated that’s unlikely to happen. Yet the official still maintained it’s “100 percent to our advantage to have [a] full trial” in the Senate. Meanwhile, Rep. Chris Stewart, R-Utah, said sending articles of impeachment to the Senate was "good news." “Everyone knows what they’re going to do next. They’re going to impeach the president and send it onto the Senate, but that is the good news. That’s good news,” Stewart said. “In the U.S. Senate, there won’t be any secret testimony or dishonest leadership … or to deny a defense.” He added: “So we’ll finally be able to get to the truth.” Stewart went on to list several witnesses he hoped the Senate would call to testify, including the whistleblower, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, Hunter Biden, Burisma board member Devon Archer, Chalupa, and Fusion GPS researcher Nellie Ohr. And the president, himself, seems to be welcoming the trial as well. “There’s nothing there,” Trump said Friday during an interview with “Fox & Friends,” saying “there should never be an impeachment,” and echoing GOP requests for the whistleblower, Schiff and Hunter Biden to appear as witnesses. At the center of the impeachment inquiry, which began in September, is Trump’s July 25 phone call with Kiev. That call prompted the whistleblower complaint to the intelligence community inspector general, and in turn, the impeachment inquiry in the House. Trump challenged the accuracy of the complaint, though the transcript released by the White House did support the core allegations that he pressed for politically related investigations. The president’s request came after millions in U.S. military aid to Ukraine had been frozen, which Democrats and witnesses have claimed shows a "quid pro quo" arrangement. Trump denies any wrongdoing. Brooke Singman is a Politics Reporter for Fox News. Follow her on Twitter at @brookefoxnews. 35 minutes ago, Jimmy Snacks said: Why won't he let them testify? White House keeps Democrats from critical witnesses - https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/471745-white-house-keeps-democrats-from-critical-witnesses Trump says he wants a trial and all the little Trumpkins believe him. He doesn't want anyone to testify but he wants a trial. Just like he wanted this all out in the open, until it was out in the open. Trumpkins are good little fella's they believe anything he tells them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted November 23, 2019 Share Posted November 23, 2019 1 minute ago, BOHICA said: Sondland said Trump told him directly that he wanted “nothing from Ukraine, wanted no quid pro quo”. Ukraine got the aid money for nothing. black and white, and cut and dry. Why do the others even need to testify after Sondland testified. He cleared it up for any of those with a brain. Jesus Christ you gullible fucktard. That was right after Trump found out about the whistleblower. Of course he said he wanted nothing. Trump is dumb but he isn't that dumb. Trumpkins on the other hand............ I'm surprised they have enough braincells to remember to breathe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irv Posted November 23, 2019 Share Posted November 23, 2019 4 hours ago, XCR1250 said: Video I thought Shifty looked familiar. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted November 24, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 24, 2019 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irv Posted November 24, 2019 Share Posted November 24, 2019 The State of the Democratic Party 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member ViperGTS/Z1 Posted November 24, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 24, 2019 14 hours ago, irv said: The State of the Democratic Party That about sums it up ......Dems weren't gonna give this guy a shot from the get go. You can almost read their minds, thinking of how to get him out by any means. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted November 24, 2019 Share Posted November 24, 2019 13 minutes ago, ViperGTS/Z1 said: That about sums it up ......Dems weren't gonna give this guy a shot from the get go. You can almost read their minds, thinking of how to get him out by any means. They have continually under estimated Trump from walk down the escalator till now and it has cost them dearly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted November 24, 2019 Share Posted November 24, 2019 17 minutes ago, Carlos Danger said: They have continually under estimated Trump from walk down the escalator till now and it has cost them dearly. You can really bring forward the lack of character and integrity in a possible business venture when you just act a bit dumb so, they reveal their intentions. Winning is easy after that. If Trump is playing this “dumb act” to let the Dems look look like the corrupt liars they are, he’s doing it well. If he’s literally just dumb.....he’s still doing it well. How fucking idiotic is the Dem party? Just look at their fan base here for that answer. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.