Snake Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 (Washington, DC) –Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that within 30 days Hillary Clinton must answer under oath two additional questions about her controversial email system. In 2016, Clinton was required to submit under oath written answers to Judicial Watch’s questions. Clinton objected to and refused to answer questions about the creation of her email system; her decision to use the system despite warnings from State Department cybersecurity officials; and the basis for her claim that the State Department had “90-95%” of her emails. After a lengthy hearing yesterday Judge Sullivan ruled that Clinton must address two questions that she refused to answer under-oath. Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational. During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts. Judge Sullivan read his opinion from the bench, deciding that the question about the creation of the email system was within the scope of discovery. Judge Sullivan rejected Clinton’s assertion of attorney-client privilege on the question about the emails “in the State’s system.” The court refused Judicial Watch’s and media’s requests to unseal the deposition videos of Huma Abedin, Cheryl Mills and other Clinton State Department officials. And it upheld Clinton’s objections to answering a question about why she refused to stop using her Blackberry despite warnings from State Department security personnel. Justice Department lawyers for the State Department defended Clinton’s refusal to answer certain questions and argued for the continued secrecy of the deposition videos. This hearing and court ruling is the latest development in a Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit about the controversial employment status of Huma Abedin, former deputy chief of staff to Clinton. The lawsuit, which seeks records regarding the authorization for Abedin to engage in outside employment while employed by the Department of State, was reopened because of revelations about the clintonemail.com system (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:13-cv-01363)). The court also granted discovery to Judicial Watch to help determine if and how Clinton’s email system thwarted FOIA. “A federal court ordered Hillary Clinton to answer more questions about her illicit email system – which is good news,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “It is shameful that Judicial Watch attorneys must continue to battle the State and Justice Departments, which still defend Hillary Clinton, for basic answers to our questions about Clinton’s email misconduct.” https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-federal-court-ordered-hillary-clinton-to-answer-additional-email-questions-under-oath/?utm_source=t.co&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=press release Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 She will take the fiff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted November 16, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 16, 2018 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 32 minutes ago, Jimmy Snacks said: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 49 minutes ago, f7ben said: She will take the fiff Yup. Or "not recall" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USA Contributing Member $poorsledder$ Posted November 16, 2018 USA Contributing Member Share Posted November 16, 2018 Is this woman even relevant anymore? You can't be serious that she might try and run for some office again..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 Fif Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 Maybe they can chase Nixon for those lost minutes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 1 minute ago, Mainecat said: Maybe they can chase Nixon for those lost minutes Or try to find some Collusion 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 41 minutes ago, Whiskey Tango Foxtrot said: Yup. Or "not recall" Misremembered... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted November 16, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 16, 2018 5 minutes ago, f7ben said: Or try to find some Collusion MC ben 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 So the only Hillary fans here are Slinger and MC? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hwytohell Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 2 hours ago, $poorsledder$ said: Is this woman even relevant anymore? You can't be serious that she might try and run for some office again..... Oh , hilliary rotten clintoon is running again . The dems has not one person , with a cash advantage and a still operating political ATM machine for the start of the 2020 campaign. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mileage Psycho Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 4 hours ago, Snake said: (Washington, DC) –Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that within 30 days Hillary Clinton must answer under oath two additional questions about her controversial email system. In 2016, Clinton was required to submit under oath written answers to Judicial Watch’s questions. Clinton objected to and refused to answer questions about the creation of her email system; her decision to use the system despite warnings from State Department cybersecurity officials; and the basis for her claim that the State Department had “90-95%” of her emails. After a lengthy hearing yesterday Judge Sullivan ruled that Clinton must address two questions that she refused to answer under-oath. Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational. During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts. Judge Sullivan read his opinion from the bench, deciding that the question about the creation of the email system was within the scope of discovery. Judge Sullivan rejected Clinton’s assertion of attorney-client privilege on the question about the emails “in the State’s system.” The court refused Judicial Watch’s and media’s requests to unseal the deposition videos of Huma Abedin, Cheryl Mills and other Clinton State Department officials. And it upheld Clinton’s objections to answering a question about why she refused to stop using her Blackberry despite warnings from State Department security personnel. Justice Department lawyers for the State Department defended Clinton’s refusal to answer certain questions and argued for the continued secrecy of the deposition videos. This hearing and court ruling is the latest development in a Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit about the controversial employment status of Huma Abedin, former deputy chief of staff to Clinton. The lawsuit, which seeks records regarding the authorization for Abedin to engage in outside employment while employed by the Department of State, was reopened because of revelations about the clintonemail.com system (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:13-cv-01363)). The court also granted discovery to Judicial Watch to help determine if and how Clinton’s email system thwarted FOIA. “A federal court ordered Hillary Clinton to answer more questions about her illicit email system – which is good news,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “It is shameful that Judicial Watch attorneys must continue to battle the State and Justice Departments, which still defend Hillary Clinton, for basic answers to our questions about Clinton’s email misconduct.” https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-federal-court-ordered-hillary-clinton-to-answer-additional-email-questions-under-oath/?utm_source=t.co&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=press release Good! 2 hours ago, $poorsledder$ said: Is this woman even relevant anymore? You can't be serious that she might try and run for some office again..... Only in her own mind and the minds of Trump worshippers, I know it's sad but it's all some have. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 Hillary's email is as mentally retarded as Russian Collusion. Get the sweet fuck over it. Neal 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 But Jim Acosta got his press pass back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 6 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: Hillary's email is as mentally retarded as Russian Collusion. Get the sweet fuck over it. Neal Sassy! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 6 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: Hillary's email is as mentally retarded as Russian Collusion. Get the sweet fuck over it. Neal So you're okay with the average person being jailed for say taking a picture on a sub and also okay with Hillary not being jailed for what she did? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSFB Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 1 hour ago, jtssrx said: So you're okay with the average person being jailed for say taking a picture on a sub and also okay with Hillary not being jailed for what she did? I don't give a shit about either. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 3 hours ago, NaturallyAspirated said: I don't give a shit about either. Neal Yes you’re a selfish fuck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.