1trailmaker Posted November 6, 2018 Share Posted November 6, 2018 2 hours ago, Blizzman said: Lowes (RONA) isn't pulling stores only in Ontario, they are pulling out 31 stores across Canada. So what does Ford have to do with anything related to that? Amazon is building a massive warehouse in Ottawa. Not an HQ, but still Ontario... sorry I forgot, Wynne is gone so we no longer blame the Ontario government like we have for the past decade here I know it isn't Doug fault Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted November 6, 2018 Share Posted November 6, 2018 2 hours ago, Stoney said: Had to expect that some stores would close after they rebranded on all the Rona to Lowes.....do not need two home building stores owned by the same close together, especially when the numbers start to decline.... Regarding Amazon warehouses, how about the recent ones in TO, BC, AB..... lol one of the Lowes stores they are closing just opened They also closed alot of Northern Rona's when they bought them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sksman Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 On 11/6/2018 at 1:17 AM, 1trailmaker said: lol one of the Lowes stores they are closing just opened They also closed alot of Northern Rona's when they bought them So they bought them last week and closed them? I didn't hear that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 3 hours ago, Sksman said: So they bought them last week and closed them? I didn't hear that. was opened in September west end Toronto Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
02sled Posted November 8, 2018 Share Posted November 8, 2018 On 11/3/2018 at 6:40 PM, 1trailmaker said: What RED TAPE 02sled give me the list it was under Wynne and the Liberals when the deal started, you should it wasn't possible because we were not open for business until Doug said so You don't get it and are obviously too stupid to ever understand. None of this would be happening without SPECIAL INCENTIVES mainly from the city for them to come here. UNDER NORMAL BUSINESS CIRCUMSTANCES THEY WOULDN'T BE COMING TO TORONTO OR EVEN CONSIDER IT. Essentially under normal circumstances business isn't interested in coming to Ontario when they have other options. GET IT... NO SPECIAL INCENTIVES OFFERED - NOT COMING TO ONTARIO. The reason for the incentives? The port lands have so many drawbacks nobody would touch them without HUGE financial incentives. As for the red tape (bureaucracy) BS here you go. Too bad you won't be able to understand this either. https://business.financialpost.com/news/economy/its-not-just-taxes-here-is-whats-really-killing-canadas-competitiveness On 11/4/2018 at 7:16 PM, ArcticCrusher said: Cost to do business here is too high. Btw TO is out of the Amazon running. Amazon is apparently splitting things and building in their offices in two different cities in the US. They are building a warehouse for one reason only.... to provide cost effective delivery to the customers here. On 11/5/2018 at 12:15 PM, 1trailmaker said: more leaving Ontario under Dougie and its not even 6 months in Ontario Regional support centre, Mississauga Rona Mississauga (Westdale Mall) Rona Mississauga (Lakeshore) Rona Sault Ste. Marie Rona Sudbury Rona Peterborough Rona Kingston (Bath Road) Rona Lakefield Lowe’s North York (Centerpoint Mall) Lowe’s Sault Ste. Marie More Fail stupidity... They aren't leaving Ontario and going elsewhere. They are shutting down retail stores. They are also doing this all across the country so instead of trying to blame Doug how about your lover Trudope being to blame. But how is that possible. Another situation where these business leaders didn't get the FAIL memo that the Canadian economy is booming and the same with unemployment levels. Be sure to send your memo to all those that are going to become unemployed. Of course you really believe these decisions are made overnight. The analysis that brought these decisions probably started well over a year ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted November 10, 2018 Share Posted November 10, 2018 Boo Hoo. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/amp/canada/article-hard-to-watch-former-premier-kathleen-wynne-reflects-on-life-in/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irv Posted November 10, 2018 Share Posted November 10, 2018 4 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said: Boo Hoo. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/amp/canada/article-hard-to-watch-former-premier-kathleen-wynne-reflects-on-life-in/ Yep, that's the reason why you lost. People didn't like you, it had nothing to do with what you did to this Province. Is she really that stupid? Defiant, yet almost in tears over her party’s loss, Ms. Wynne at once defends her government’s record while acknowledging that her personal unpopularity caused her to take the extraordinary step of announcing days before the June election that she would not win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
02sled Posted November 10, 2018 Share Posted November 10, 2018 7 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said: Boo Hoo. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/amp/canada/article-hard-to-watch-former-premier-kathleen-wynne-reflects-on-life-in/ don't feel sorry for Wynnebag one bit... still collecting her $150,000.00 per year as a useless body 3 hours ago, irv said: Yep, that's the reason why you lost. People didn't like you, it had nothing to do with what you did to this Province. Is she really that stupid? Defiant, yet almost in tears over her party’s loss, Ms. Wynne at once defends her government’s record while acknowledging that her personal unpopularity caused her to take the extraordinary step of announcing days before the June election that she would not win. Actually no... she isn't that stupid.... she's that arrogant... it's all about her.... well maybe stupid too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted November 10, 2018 Share Posted November 10, 2018 10 minutes ago, 02sled said: don't feel sorry for Wynnebag one bit... still collecting her $150,000.00 per year as a useless body They don't get pensions you dolt and haven't for the last 20 years Severance pay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
02sled Posted November 11, 2018 Share Posted November 11, 2018 On 11/10/2018 at 1:48 PM, 1trailmaker said: They don't get pensions you dolt and haven't for the last 20 years Severance pay Read the article and pay attention you mental midget... she is still a MPP representing her riding. She still collecting her salary. Where did I say she was collecting a pension. Oh that's right I didn't. Showing how stupid you are is like shooting fish in a barrel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted November 11, 2018 Share Posted November 11, 2018 1 hour ago, 02sled said: Read the article and pay attention you mental midget... she is still a MPP representing her riding. She still collecting her salary. Where did I say she was collecting a pension. Oh that's right I didn't. Showing how stupid you are is like shooting fish in a barrel. and their pay is 116k If she is elected why would she not be paid? what a dolt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted November 11, 2018 Share Posted November 11, 2018 29 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: and their pay is 116k If she is elected why would she not be paid? what a dolt She needs to show up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted November 11, 2018 Share Posted November 11, 2018 4 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: She needs to show up. surprised she didn't quit all together I think by next summer she will withdraw Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted November 11, 2018 Share Posted November 11, 2018 19 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: surprised she didn't quit all together I think by next summer she will withdraw They need to hang onto every seat imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted November 11, 2018 Share Posted November 11, 2018 5 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: They need to hang onto every seat imo. not relevant today, but in 4 years there will be plenty of seats up for grabs. People (not the oneways) will tire of Doug's slogans with no results. Already unemployment has gone up and as the economy slow, SloganMan will place the blame on someone other than himself. BUCK A BEER ISN'T HERE Can't wait Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 2 hours ago, 1trailmaker said: not relevant today, but in 4 years there will be plenty of seats up for grabs. People (not the oneways) will tire of Doug's slogans with no results. Already unemployment has gone up and as the economy slow, SloganMan will place the blame on someone other than himself. BUCK A BEER ISN'T HERE Can't wait Pretty sure the books won't be as fucked as there are today. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 40 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: Pretty sure the books won't be as fucked as there are today. When you inherit a good economy and record employment the books should get better. I don't buy the 15 billion deficit Doug is selling, Do you buy the 10 billion Harper left Trudeau? doubtful Either way if he gives us a tax cut the cost won't matter similar to Harris tax cut - You won't see our debt going down anytime soon or anytime later Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 12 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: When you inherit a good economy and record employment the books should get better. I don't buy the 15 billion deficit Doug is selling, Do you buy the 10 billion Harper left Trudeau? doubtful Either way if he gives us a tax cut the cost won't matter similar to Harris tax cut - You won't see our debt going down anytime soon or anytime later 15 billion came from the auditor general so that's likely how it gets recorded. What 10 billion mess did Harper leave? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 1 minute ago, ArcticCrusher said: 15 billion came from the auditor general so that's likely how it gets recorded. What 10 billion mess did Harper leave? Deferred spending, it was brought up when Trudeau went to near 20 billion deficit Trudeau maintained the Liberals remained consistent with their 2015 election commitment to add about $10 billion in new spending for 2016-17, their first full year in office. He argued, however, that the Liberals had to deal with a baseline deficit of $18 billion after coming to power, even though their Tory predecessors had predicted a balanced budget. The fiscal impact left behind by the Tories was a $1-billion deficit that affected the bottom line in 2015-16, Chloe Luciani-Girouard wrote in an email. Its been Harper's (or any government) game played many times In 2009-10, for example, the final year-end federal deficit wound up at $55.6 billion — fully $15.1 billion worse than the 11-month figures showed in February 2010. In 2011-12, the final deficit was $11.8 billion deeper than the February figure. Last year(14), the final deficit was $4 billion deeper. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 9 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: Deferred spending, it was brought up when Trudeau went to near 20 billion deficit Trudeau maintained the Liberals remained consistent with their 2015 election commitment to add about $10 billion in new spending for 2016-17, their first full year in office. He argued, however, that the Liberals had to deal with a baseline deficit of $18 billion after coming to power, even though their Tory predecessors had predicted a balanced budget. The fiscal impact left behind by the Tories was a $1-billion deficit that affected the bottom line in 2015-16, Chloe Luciani-Girouard wrote in an email. Its been Harper's (or any government) game played many times In 2009-10, for example, the final year-end federal deficit wound up at $55.6 billion — fully $15.1 billion worse than the 11-month figures showed in February 2010. In 2011-12, the final deficit was $11.8 billion deeper than the February figure. Last year(14), the final deficit was $4 billion deeper. It was recorded as a 2 billion surplus, sorry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 1 hour ago, ArcticCrusher said: It was recorded as a 2 billion surplus, sorry. and Wynne's was recorded at 6 billion You are trying very hard to get Harper 1 balanced budget matter of fact this is a Party first since the 60's It really shows how meaningless deficits are, you vote Cons because they are good with money but they aren't even close Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 9 hours ago, 1trailmaker said: and Wynne's was recorded at 6 billion You are trying very hard to get Harper 1 balanced budget matter of fact this is a Party first since the 60's It really shows how meaningless deficits are, you vote Cons because they are good with money but they aren't even close Her budget added 20 billion a year to the debt for the next 4 years. Its all where you want to place the numbers, the picture still looks the same. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 27 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: Her budget added 20 billion a year to the debt for the next 4 years. Its all where you want to place the numbers, the picture still looks the same. NO 20 billion is a 5 billion deficit NOT 15 billion like Doug says it is now. That would add 60 billion in 4 years The numbber games these people play is always the same game rules Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sksman Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 51 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: NO 20 billion is a 5 billion deficit NOT 15 billion like Doug says it is now. That would add 60 billion in 4 years The numbber games these people play is always the same game rules Anybody that doesn't believe smoking pot effects your brain really needs to read your posts! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MuskokaGator Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 You really need to think before you comment on financial matters. I know that is a lot to ask of you but you really need to try. A 5 billion deficit becomes 20 if the government commits to 5 billion new spending in each of the 4 years. 15 billion only becomes 60 if they commit to 15 billion in new spending in each year for 4 years; if they don't it is just 15 billion for that year. The cost to carry that debt in the following years will add to the deficit but it wont be 15 billion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.