That's around 15 hp less than @ZR6000RR claimed it would make....

Edited March 1, 20241 yr by krom

Decent power, right in line with the market depending on dyno's. Nothing game changing by any means but ok.

10% off isn't that bad of an estimate 

and before anyone asks:

Quote

Yes, it has six hours runtime so it was out of break-in

 

Just watched the video they posted. it makes more power than the 600 at roughly 6500 rpm. 

21 minutes ago, krom said:

 

 

That's around 15 hp less than @ZR6000RR claimed it would make....

I said 172 to what ever. Pre production means jack btw.

Pretty close to the claimed 10% gain over the 800ctec

2 minutes ago, mnstang said:

Pretty close to the claimed 10% gain over the 800ctec

 Pretty sure they claimed 11%

150.5 +11%=167

 

3 minutes ago, mnstang said:

Pretty close to the claimed 10% gain over the 800ctec

They claimed 11% and gave 7.5% not very good. They shouldn’t have posted it as soon as they saw it wasn’t 17x

Just now, krom said:

 Pretty sure they claimed 11%

150.5 +11%=167

 

Was that on dynotech? I was going off d&d consistently being around 154-155

2 minutes ago, Palu49 said:

Was that on dynotech? I was going off d&d consistently being around 154-155

thats starting at 167, and doing the math to get 150.5

Reasonably lower RPM @ 7900.

Now if that was Bikeman it would be in the 170's.  Add a Bikeman sticker 180's

160 + 11%=177.6 . 10 HP down!!!!

22 minutes ago, Doug said:

Reasonably lower RPM @ 7900.

Now if that was Bikeman it would be in the 170's.  Add a Bikeman sticker 180's

Easy 180 there. 

We'll be heading to jaws to develop a twin pipe/porting combo this summer, hopefully we can make good gains but i had really hoped for more to work with.

Here’s the deal, Cat needed a grand slam here and instead tied the ball game in the bottom of the 23rd. They made a couple HP more than the doo and the same power Polaris made a few years ago. You can’t continue wait this long to be an also ran.

28 minutes ago, Palu49 said:

Here’s the deal, Cat needed a grand slam here and instead tied the ball game in the bottom of the 23rd. They made a couple HP more than the doo and the same power Polaris made a few years ago. You can’t continue wait this long to be an also ran.

It's a fucking pre production motor! Fuck, you are stupid!

10 minutes ago, ZR6000RR said:

It's a fucking pre production motor! Fuck, you are stupid!

The pre production motor in the 600 made 3hp more than a production one. That 167 number is going to be real close to what it will be. 

14 minutes ago, ZR6000RR said:

It's a fucking pre production motor! Fuck, you are stupid!

Started early on the Coors?    

3 minutes ago, jonlafon1 said:

Started early on the Coors?    

Common fucking sense! 

8 minutes ago, Not greg b said:

The pre production motor in the 600 made 3hp more than a production one. That 167 number is going to be real close to what it will be. 

Yeah, ok. Dyno's only mean anything on the day its ran. Is it run cold? Room temp? They are useless to the average sledder. Prove me wrong!

2 minutes ago, ZR6000RR said:

Common fucking sense! 

No. common sense was already posted by Not greg b  !!  

Edited March 1, 20241 yr by jonlafon1

2 minutes ago, ZR6000RR said:

Yeah, ok. Dyno's only mean anything on the day its ran. Is it run cold? Room temp? They are useless to the average sledder. Prove me wrong!

You've proven yourself wrong endlessly (and fucking stupid too)

You know nothigh at all about engines, hp, or how a dyno works, and even less about dynotech.  (who has a giant refrigeration system for the dyno)

I know you aren't capable of figuring it out but the DA is right on the dyno sheet posted above.

Since you are too stupid to even know what DA stands for:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Density_altitude

1 hour ago, Tommcat said:

We'll be heading to jaws to develop a twin pipe/porting combo this summer, hopefully we can make good gains but i had really hoped for more to work with.

Ask him about watercross racing in small NW Ontario town. I was active in our club that hosted them back in the day.

Just now, krom said:

You've proven yourself wrong endlessly (and fucking stupid too)

You know nothigh at all about engines, hp, or how a dyno works, and even less about dynotech.  (who has a giant refrigeration system for the dyno)

I know you aren't capable of figuring it out but the DA is right on the dyno sheet posted above.

Since you are too stupid to even know what DA stands for:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Density_altitude

Horsepower is theoretical. ((Calculated) torque is real. Dyno an engine one day then another two days later, the numbers will change. Were they chilling the air? This year? Probably not. Continue being a New York Brain dead idiot. You are what you are. Pure stupidity!

2 hours ago, Palu49 said:

They claimed 11% and gave 7.5% not very good. They shouldn’t have posted it as soon as they saw it wasn’t 17x

Ctec 800 is 153 on same dyno.

That's 9.16% increase in this scenario on this particular dyno.

Just now, ZR6000RR said:

Horsepower is theoretical. ((Calculated) torque is real. Dyno an engine one day then another two days later, the numbers will change. Were they chilling the air? This year? Probably not. Continue being a New York Brain dead idiot. You are what you are. Pure stupidity!

Speaking of stupid... theoretical, and calculated, do not have anywhere near the same meaning.

Also you have absolutely ZERO experience doing anything on an engine, and have never even seen a dyno.  Everything you are claiming was made up in your empty head, and pulled out of your huge ass.