Twitter files

[Plissken]

3 minutes ago, airflite1 said:

Way easier said than done, cost of staffing and training makes this prohibitive. The simple alternative is in person voting with an ID.

What about the military?  

[airflite1]

Just now, Plissken said:

But not badly enough to actually move to Idaho.  

The big push is more recent, Portland controls the states policies and most people are tired of it, Portlandia, let the have their own country.. 

[Steve753]

8 minutes ago, airflite1 said:

Way easier said than done, cost of staffing and training makes this prohibitive. The simple alternative is in person voting with an ID.

Well Republicans better get with the program and start mailing in as well then.

Edited December 13, 2022 by Steve753

[airflite1]

3 minutes ago, Plissken said:

What about the military?  

In reality it wouldn't be that hard, they could have voting places on base check their ID with which state they're voting and count accordingly. No different than voting places turning in their counts.  

[Plissken]

27 minutes ago, airflite1 said:

In reality it wouldn't be that hard, they could have voting places on base check their ID with which state they're voting and count accordingly. No different than voting places turning in their counts.  

Adding cost and complexity to solve a problem that didn’t exist just seems so liberal though.  

[akvanden]

46 minutes ago, airflite1 said:

Which the state stated they don't have the staff or the training to properly inspect the ballots. There were multiple recounts.

Well, apparently they do. Anything other than “Trump said” would be helpful to the point your trying to make. They even had time to look into the 2,000 mules claims.

ID has to match, signature has to match. No one can articulate how this type of system could be rampant with mass fraud.

”Upon receipt of each ballot, a registrar or clerk shall write the day and hour of the receipt of the ballot on its envelope. The registrar or clerk shall then compare the identifying information on the oath with the information on file in his or her office, shall compare the signature or mark on the oath with the signature or mark on the absentee elector's voter registration card or the most recent update to such absentee elector's voter registration card and application for absentee ballot or a facsimile of said signature or mark taken from said card or application, and shall, if the information and signature appear to be valid and other identifying information appears to be correct, so certify by signing or initialing his or her name below the voter's oath. Each elector's name so certified shall be listed by the registrar or clerk on the numbered list of absentee voters prepared for his or her precinct. 

If the elector has failed to sign the oath, or if the signature does not appear to be valid, or if the elector has failed to furnish required information or information so furnished does not conform with that on file in the registrar's or clerk's office, or if the elector is otherwise found disqualified to vote, the registrar or clerk shall write across the face of the envelope "Rejected," 

 

https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2020/title-21/chapter-2/article-10/section-21-2-386/

[airflite1]

3 hours ago, akvanden said:

Well, apparently they do. Anything other than “Trump said” would be helpful to the point your trying to make. They even had time to look into the 2,000 mules claims.

ID has to match, signature has to match. No one can articulate how this type of system could be rampant with mass fraud.

”Upon receipt of each ballot, a registrar or clerk shall write the day and hour of the receipt of the ballot on its envelope. The registrar or clerk shall then compare the identifying information on the oath with the information on file in his or her office, shall compare the signature or mark on the oath with the signature or mark on the absentee elector's voter registration card or the most recent update to such absentee elector's voter registration card and application for absentee ballot or a facsimile of said signature or mark taken from said card or application, and shall, if the information and signature appear to be valid and other identifying information appears to be correct, so certify by signing or initialing his or her name below the voter's oath. Each elector's name so certified shall be listed by the registrar or clerk on the numbered list of absentee voters prepared for his or her precinct. 

If the elector has failed to sign the oath, or if the signature does not appear to be valid, or if the elector has failed to furnish required information or information so furnished does not conform with that on file in the registrar's or clerk's office, or if the elector is otherwise found disqualified to vote, the registrar or clerk shall write across the face of the envelope "Rejected," 

 

https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2020/title-21/chapter-2/article-10/section-21-2-386/

This has gotten sidetracked from accusing Trump of demanding they find votes for him, instead of what he actually said that they look into possible  fraud. You copied and pasted what the law requires them to do, but both sides say they don't have the personnel or training to do it. Here's a statement from Stacy Abram's lawsuit. so both sides are saying there is a problem.

The plaintiffs also say election officials aren’t sufficiently trained on canceling an absentee ballot if someone chooses to vote in person instead, which can cause voters to be turned away or forced to cast a provisional ballot.

 

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/election-lawsuit-backed-by-stacey-abrams-goes-to-trial-in-georgia

Edited December 13, 2022 by airflite1

[airflite1]

4 hours ago, Plissken said:

Adding cost and complexity to solve a problem that didn’t exist just seems so liberal though.  

It seems a lot simpler than the requesting, issuing, and verifying of absentee ballots. 

 

[akvanden]

9 minutes ago, airflite1 said:

The plaintiffs also say election officials aren’t sufficiently trained on canceling an absentee ballot if someone chooses to vote in person instead, which can cause voters to be turned away or forced to cast a provisional ballot.

Well now we’re not even talking about fraud, rather someone casting an absentee ballot then wanting to cancel it and vote in person instead. The lawsuit isn’t even about fraud, rather alleged voter suppression.

 

 

[airflite1]

Just now, akvanden said:

Well now we’re not even talking about fraud, rather someone casting an absentee ballot then wanting to cancel it and vote in person instead. The lawsuit isn’t even about fraud, rather alleged voter suppression.

 

 

Ya, I was looking for a quote from earlier, too much reading before I had to go to work. but still both sides say they don't have the staff to do what's required by law, they just state it from different angles.

[Deephaven]

7 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said:

So Fauci created the virus through funding through Ecohealth who provided grants to Wuhan.

You have been played.

What?  It was Bill Gates first, then Ralph Baric and now Fauci?  Obviously you are the one being played.

7 hours ago, akvanden said:

But it’s all connected.

And "It's all part of the plan" .  Same plan Lloyd is too stupid to explain....but "it's simple".

7 hours ago, Jimmy Snacks said:

Dude is an autistic Parrot with Tourettes.😂

That isn't nice to parrots.

5 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said:

No, that's where we are different.

Yes, you lie incessantly and are dumb as shit.

5 hours ago, airflite1 said:

As someone that voted by mail in, how do you propose enforcing proper ID, the checks in place in Minnesota are a joke.

And I have been in Europe for the last 6 elections.  Without a mail in system, how would I vote?

[ArcticCrusher]

Boom.

Like I have said morons.  You're being played.

 

 

[Steve753]

1 minute ago, ArcticCrusher said:

Boom.

Like I have said morons.  You're being played.

 

 

So prominent, they couldn't be named!

[ArcticCrusher]

3 minutes ago, Steve753 said:

So prominent, they couldn't be named!

You think he's lying?

Stay ignorant Schultz.

[Deephaven]

Wrong thread moron.

[ArcticCrusher]

38 minutes ago, Deephaven said:

Wrong thread moron.

Over your stupid head again

 

[Deephaven]

No, your obsession with one thing shows your stupidity.  Nothing is over my head, you on the other hand are always lost.

[Rod]

17 minutes ago, Deephaven said:

No, your obsession with one thing shows your stupidity.  Nothing is over my head, you on the other hand are always lost.

Nothing goes over your head. Your reflexes are too fast you will catch it

[Guest]

48 minutes ago, ACE said:

Your reflexes are too fast you will catch it

Prolly played hockey like a man 

[ArcticCrusher]

The left lost it over this.

 

 

[ArcticCrusher]

The science is settled.

 

 

 

[Rod]

1 hour ago, HSR said:

Prolly played hockey like a man 

And then went on to be a roofer or what 

[Guest]

6 minutes ago, ACE said:

And then went on to be a roofer or what 

Possibly male figure skaters become farmers.

[EvilBird]

12 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

The science is settled.

 

 

 

And no tick tock death counter on CNN anymore....How convenient.  

[Rod]

5 minutes ago, HSR said:

Possibly male figure skaters become farmers.

Is that what you did or were you a figure skater become janitor