Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Twitter files


Pete

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, akvanden said:

I think the original question was voter fraud, most likely on a large scale, which would be difficult given the ID requirements for getting absentee ballots in GA.

And wasn't that addressed in the video of the phone conversation, that information submitted for absentee ballots didn't match the voters information, and the suggestion that Trump wanted them to find extra votes when he actually stated with the 100's of thousand votes it should be easy to find  enough fraud to change the outcome. I was reading Stacy Abrams lawsuit and she is fighting to remove all the protections that are in place saying it's restricting the poor and minorities votes. 

Edited by airflite1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
2 minutes ago, ACE said:

Plus quid pro quo leading to impeachment. We now know how much Biden and zekensky have been working together to embezzle billions and they needed trump out of the way 

Impeachments were meaningless and just for optics. He shouldn't even acknowledged them. He also should've ignored the media. Especially Acosta. But no he couldn't help himself and kept throwing fire on the flames. If he was smart he would've waited until after the mid terms in his 2nd term to let them have it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
5 minutes ago, airflite1 said:

And wasn't that addressed in the video of the phone conversation, that information submitted for absentee ballots didn't match the voters information, and the suggestion that Trump wanted them to find extra votes when he actually stated with the 100's of thousand votes it should be easy to find  enough fraud to change the outcome. I was reading Stacy Abrams lawsuit and she is fighting to remove all the protections that are in place saying it's restricting the poor and minorities votes. 

Funny everything was ok in Georgia during the mid terms. Wouldn't all these people who got screwed in 20 made their presence known at this time to bring light to it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Steve753 said:

Funny everything was ok in Georgia during the mid terms. Wouldn't all these people who got screwed in 20 made their presence known at this time to bring light to it?

people were making their presence known, the states response was they don't have the staffing to inspect all the ballots and those that are there aren't trained to do it.  You have the Democrats wanting to remove all restrictions then the Republicans wanting to keep them in place, but run into budget restraints to be able to implement them, hence their reasoning that in person voting with an ID is the best option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
5 minutes ago, airflite1 said:

people were making their presence known, the states response was they don't have the staffing to inspect all the ballots and those that are there aren't trained to do it.  You have the Democrats wanting to remove all restrictions then the Republicans wanting to keep them in place, but run into budget restraints to be able to implement them, hence their reasoning that in person voting with an ID is the best option.

They were?  Is there a video or a link?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
3 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

Is there anyplace in the world where mail in ballots are not a major source of fraud.

 

If Trump had won and the dems cried fraud, you'd be perfectly OK with them.

Edited by Steve753
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Steve753 said:

They were?  Is there a video or a link?

Really, You aren't even trying, so do support Stacy Abrams lawsuit and Democrats wanting to remove all election protections because they are racist or do you want secure elections?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
Just now, airflite1 said:

Really, You aren't even trying, so do support Stacy Abrams lawsuit and Democrats wanting to remove all election protections because they are racist or do you want secure elections?

Abrams is a despicable piece of garbage. She's an election denier like Trump. The securer, the better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, airflite1 said:

And wasn't that addressed in the video of the phone conversation, that information submitted for absentee ballots didn't match the voters information, and the suggestion that Trump wanted them to find extra votes when he actually stated with the 100's of thousand votes it should be easy to find  enough fraud to change the outcome. I was reading Stacy Abrams lawsuit and she is fighting to remove all the protections that are in place saying it's restricting the poor and minorities votes. 

The point is there’s no evidence of Trump’s claims from two years ago in GA. The republican run state ran multiple audits and looked into specific allegations and found nothing.  No one can even begin to articulate how you could pull off mass absentee ballot fraud in GA due to ID verification requirements.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, akvanden said:

The point is there’s no evidence of Trump’s claims from two years ago in GA. The republican run state ran multiple audits and looked into specific allegations and found nothing.  No one can even begin to articulate how you could pull off mass absentee ballot fraud in GA due to ID verification requirements.

Which the state stated they don't have the staff or the training to properly inspect the ballots. There were multiple recounts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
Just now, airflite1 said:

As someone that voted by mail in, how do you propose enforcing proper ID, the checks in place in Minnesota are a joke.

Anything that looks suspect, be put aside. If they see certain trends, dig deeper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Steve753 said:

Anything that looks suspect, be put aside. If they see certain trends, dig deeper.

Way easier said than done, cost of staffing and training makes this prohibitive. The simple alternative is in person voting with an ID.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...