ArcticCrusher Posted April 29, 2022 Share Posted April 29, 2022 Must be special math. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted April 29, 2022 Share Posted April 29, 2022 1 hour ago, ArcticCrusher said: What does the Pfizer data dump they were trying to hide for 75 years say? Stay strong moron. 1 hour ago, Deephaven said: Ah, you have to change the subject when you don't understand. Nothing huh. Keep looking like an idiot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted April 29, 2022 Share Posted April 29, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, ArcticCrusher said: Must be special math. 6 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said: The only thing that matters in the end is all case deaths. Sorry if you don't understand this Follow your rules - I don't want to see anymore hospitalization or cases shit posted from you. You're worse than my wife, just constant contradictions. Edit: I like how some idiot just decides to take a snapshot of NSW rather than the entire country of Australia combined. And how NSW is 96.2% with 1 dose +, so again 4/96 * x = 13/115 = ~3x higher rate. Honest question: when do you think you'll start checking these numbers for yourself vs just blindly posting like you have been? It has got to be frustrating for you. Edited April 29, 2022 by akvanden Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted April 29, 2022 Share Posted April 29, 2022 1 hour ago, ArcticCrusher said: Nothing huh. Keep looking like an idiot. I answered. Since we were discussing negative efficacy and you brought up the pfizer data dump explain how you think that the data dump will prove the negative efficacy that isn't currently happening. I understand why you are confused by twitter all the time as you can't seem to read. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted April 29, 2022 Share Posted April 29, 2022 There's more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted April 29, 2022 Share Posted April 29, 2022 20 hours ago, Deephaven said: I answered. Since we were discussing negative efficacy and you brought up the pfizer data dump explain how you think that the data dump will prove the negative efficacy that isn't currently happening. I understand why you are confused by twitter all the time as you can't seem to read. I suggest you take a hard look at the Pfizer data that they wanted to hide for 75 years before you make a complete fool of yourself. Or do you need someone to spoon feed it to you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted April 29, 2022 Share Posted April 29, 2022 This is brutal and yes lawsuits are being filed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted April 30, 2022 Share Posted April 30, 2022 1 hour ago, ArcticCrusher said: There's more. I enjoy how the first spike is lockdowns killing people, not Covid. 1 hour ago, ArcticCrusher said: I suggest you take a hard look at the Pfizer data that they wanted to hide for 75 years before you make a complete fool of yourself. Or do you need someone to spoon feed it to you? I think you mean the FDA. 1 hour ago, ArcticCrusher said: This is brutal and yes lawsuits are being filed. Shocking. And still no pregnancy issues among vaccinated women. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted April 30, 2022 Share Posted April 30, 2022 3 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said: I suggest you take a hard look at the Pfizer data that they wanted to hide for 75 years before you make a complete fool of yourself. Or do you need someone to spoon feed it to you? You make a fool of yourself in nearly every post you make. Why do you think your attempt to summarize it would be any different. You only understand what others explain to you and you look up to some really stupid people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franks pond Posted May 1, 2022 Share Posted May 1, 2022 pepper.mp4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irv Posted May 1, 2022 Share Posted May 1, 2022 (edited) The Evaporating Effectiveness of Covid-19 Vaccines as Shown by the Newest Ontario Government Data The analysis showed that, beginning about mid-December as the Omicron variant of the SARS-CoV-2 virus replaced Delta as the dominant strain, fully vaccinated people were becoming infected not only in greater numbers but at a greater rate (cases per 100,000) than unvaccinated people. These results indicated that the effectiveness of currently available vaccines for Covid-19 was collapsing. Indeed, C2C’s evaluation of the official government data for Canada’s largest province suggested that the effectiveness had actually become negative – that is, fully vaccinated people were more likely to become infected than unvaccinated people. As noted, these results were consistent with the conclusions in a scientific paper by 12 Ontario (plus one U.S.) public health/university scientists published on MedRxiv on December 30, 2021. A subsequent C2C article looked at data from international sources and found the same phenomenon. This article referenced a British study published last September that found vaccine effectiveness already decreasing with Delta from that achieved against the ancestral strain that was used to develop the vaccines. It also quoted a Wall Street Journal article co-authored by a Nobel Laureate in Medicine referencing a Danish study published last December which “found that after 30 days the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines no longer had any statistically significant positive effect against Omicron infections, and after 90 days, their effect went negative – i.e., vaccinated people were more susceptible to Omicron infection.” The number of new daily cases is no longer published. The infection rate (new cases per 100,000) continues to be published, although the categories have been changed from “fully vaccinated,” “partially vaccinated” and “unvaccinated” to “fully-vaccinated-with-booster-dose (one or more)” (FV+B), “fully-vaccinated” (FV) and “not-fully-vaccinated” (NFV). In the new approach, the first two categories partition the previous “fully vaccinated” category. The “not-fully-vaccinated” category, however, amalgamates the previous “partially vaccinated” and “unvaccinated” categories. https://c2cjournal.ca/2022/04/the-evaporating-effectiveness-of-covid-19-vaccines-as-shown-by-the-newest-ontario-government-data/?fbclid=IwAR3GEA5OsFMw-kHTk9clYHPkPDg489h7KHG3oVRR3K3XSyAmuxY1lEVGbBQ Edited May 1, 2022 by irv Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted May 1, 2022 Share Posted May 1, 2022 (edited) On 4/29/2022 at 9:12 PM, akvanden said: I enjoy how the first spike is lockdowns killing people, not Covid. I think you mean the FDA. Shocking. And still no pregnancy issues among vaccinated women. It's twice above the baseline after getting vaxxed. Nothing to see here either. Edited May 1, 2022 by ArcticCrusher Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted May 1, 2022 Share Posted May 1, 2022 On 4/29/2022 at 10:51 PM, Deephaven said: You make a fool of yourself in nearly every post you make. Why do you think your attempt to summarize it would be any different. You only understand what others explain to you and you look up to some really stupid people. Let Jessica Rose explain it to you. A real expert She's been calling it straight from day one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted May 1, 2022 Share Posted May 1, 2022 Let the math experts spin it. Pathetic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted May 2, 2022 Share Posted May 2, 2022 You still aren't making a point. So off topic it would take pounds of crystal methe to get that off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted May 2, 2022 Share Posted May 2, 2022 6 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said: Let the math experts spin it. Pathetic. Fancy graphs to show 4% of the population causing 16% of the deaths. Super. Spin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted May 2, 2022 Share Posted May 2, 2022 And again not negative efficacy like promised. He sucks donkey at understanding elementary school math. Add the statistics of who took and didn't take the vax and it unravels further for him...but now he is off to search the Twitter world for something else that he will think backs up his point only to post it and have it not again. It must suck to always be so wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted May 2, 2022 Share Posted May 2, 2022 I wonder who takes the time to create these disinformation presentations for AC and his fellow followers - they clearly put some time in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted May 2, 2022 Share Posted May 2, 2022 Even more confusing is accepting something you read at face value and not thinking about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted May 2, 2022 Share Posted May 2, 2022 51 minutes ago, Deephaven said: Even more confusing is accepting something you read at face value and not thinking about it. Look up Jessica Rose. Then get back to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted May 2, 2022 Share Posted May 2, 2022 9 hours ago, akvanden said: Fancy graphs to show 4% of the population causing 16% of the deaths. Super. Spin. How do the excess deaths factor in? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
polaris7541 Posted May 2, 2022 Share Posted May 2, 2022 when are we all going to wake up ,, this is controlled population control ,, WE NEED TO WAKE THE F UP ,, china,,, gates biden,,,, zuckerberg ,, there all involved Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted May 2, 2022 Share Posted May 2, 2022 8 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: Look up Jessica Rose. Then get back to me. Why? Because you are too dumb to actually make a point for yourself? Make your own case or go rehide in your flock. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dsupercat Posted May 2, 2022 Author Share Posted May 2, 2022 On 4/28/2022 at 9:08 PM, akvanden said: You're worse than my wife, just constant contradictions. I think you mean husband. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted May 2, 2022 Share Posted May 2, 2022 1 minute ago, Deephaven said: Why? Because you are too dumb to actually make a point for yourself? Make your own case or go rehide in your flock. Cause she's spot the fuck on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.