Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Canada Vac is working


Recommended Posts

Yep Canada has 380 people currently in the icu which is 1.5 times more then the US at only a 66% vaccination rate compared to Canada 82% vaccination.  How is this possible are the universal doctors in Canada that bad or is the vaccine not working??

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is Ontario.  It just shows who the morons are still trying to hold onto the covid bullshit narrative.

New cases of Covid in the triple vaxxed are twice that of the normalized unvaxxed.  Lets do deaths now, slight advantage to the unvaxxed again.

Do we need more clarity, from fake news?

 

 

 

FPh4yThWUAYA-4a.thumb.jpeg.babca3a0887bdfeee2590c6585674381.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said:

This is Ontario.  It just shows who the morons are still trying to hold onto the covid bullshit narrative.

New cases of Covid in the triple vaxxed are twice that of the normalized unvaxxed.  Lets do deaths now, slight advantage to the unvaxxed again.

Do we need more clarity, from fake news?

 

 

 

FPh4yThWUAYA-4a.thumb.jpeg.babca3a0887bdfeee2590c6585674381.jpeg

Would you happen to have  the link for that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ArcticCrusher said:

It's from Ontario government official data.  Golden pup has been providing this for about 2 years now.  

 

 

I looked on that site and couldn't find it that info that was posted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, XCR1250 said:

Not sure if that's the right one but it does show very similar info.

I posted these in the Ontario section the last few days. They clearly show a significant difference in the fully vaxxed with a booster compared with those partially and fully vaxxed. It has been quite a while now that they haven't shown any numbers in those unvaccinated. I wonder why that is??? :news:

https://www.durhamradionews.com/archives/153103

https://www.durhamradionews.com/archives/153157

https://www.durhamradionews.com/archives/152700 

https://www.durhamradionews.com/archives/152786 

https://www.durhamradionews.com/archives/152855 

https://www.durhamradionews.com/archives/152990 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, XCR1250 said:

Not sure if that's the right one but it does show very similar info.

He lists his sources and the data backs his claims.  A few months ago the unvaxxed stats were not as glowing as they are today, he did not hide that.  

Thus is what GP does.

 

FPSv0ggXsAINgjv?format=png&name=large

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said:

It's from Ontario government official data.  Golden pup has been providing this for about 2 years now.  

 

 

You guys are hilarious. Welcome to the super low vaccinated death rate! 

 

image.thumb.png.2583b818daa90998438c00b38585c451.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, irv said:

I posted these in the Ontario section the last few days. They clearly show a significant difference in the fully vaxxed with a booster compared with those partially and fully vaxxed. It has been quite a while now that they haven't shown any numbers in those unvaccinated. I wonder why that is??? :news:

https://www.durhamradionews.com/archives/153103

https://www.durhamradionews.com/archives/153157

https://www.durhamradionews.com/archives/152700 

https://www.durhamradionews.com/archives/152786 

https://www.durhamradionews.com/archives/152855 

https://www.durhamradionews.com/archives/152990 

Durhamradio news gets their data from https://covid-19.ontario.ca/

Which durhamradio clearly shows the vaccinated vs unvaccinated as seen on their April 5th link.
image.png.aee6a7b8b86f385eacc5b19f7d9c2122.png

Which given that Ontario is now 91% fully vaccinated means that the rates for unvaccinated are still much higher. But, given that omicron and hopefully future variants get weaker and weaker, both vaccinated and unvaccinated should trend towards zero ( like we see with deaths ).

 

image.png.dd14333c5e1a8d66651c5fc7df252504.png

Edited by akvanden
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, akvanden said:

Durhamradio news gets their data from https://covid-19.ontario.ca/

Which durhamradio clearly shows the vaccinated vs unvaccinated as seen on their April 5th link.
image.png.aee6a7b8b86f385eacc5b19f7d9c2122.png

Which given that Ontario is now 91% fully vaccinated means that the rates for unvaccinated are still much higher. But, given that omicron and hopefully future variants get weaker and weaker, both vaccinated and unvaccinated should trend towards zero ( like we see with deaths ).

 

image.png.dd14333c5e1a8d66651c5fc7df252504.png

I told you the deaths are low so you are counting noise, the vaxxed are overwhelmingly getting covid, only a moron can't see that.

 

Here the CDC's own employees, 70% of cases in the vaxxed, can't make this up.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said:

told you the deaths are low so you are counting noise,

And then you go posting graphs of said noise. Constantly contradicting yourself.

3 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said:

the vaxxed are overwhelmingly getting covid,

No one cares if they test positive, only if they get truly sick. Just ask ACE, getting a “mild cold” ain’t nothing. It’s a breeze.

 

3 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said:

Here the CDC's own employees, 70% of cases in the vaxxed, can't make this up.

The misinformation continues. Peter McCullough knows better than anyone that this info is meaningless unless you know what % of the CDC is vaccinated. Look at all the comments from his Twitter post saying the exact same thing.

When people that know better post info like this, their sole purpose is to mislead, which says a lot about him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, akvanden said:

And then you go posting graphs of said noise. Constantly contradicting yourself.

No one cares if they test positive, only if they get truly sick. Just ask ACE, getting a “mild cold” ain’t nothing. It’s a breeze.

 

The misinformation continues. Peter McCullough knows better than anyone that this info is meaningless unless you know what % of the CDC is vaccinated. Look at all the comments from his Twitter post saying the exact same thing.

When people that know better post info like this, their sole purpose is to mislead, which says a lot about him.

Sorry if you don't understand science.  Peter has been correct from day one.

 

Peter also stated that 50% of all vax deaths occurred within 2 days of getting the shot and 80% within 7 days, nothing to see.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

Sorry if you don't understand science.  Peter has been correct from day one.

It’s not science, it’s statistics. If the CDC is 99% vaccinated, what does that mean if 70% of the cases are in the vaccinated group?  What if the CDC is 90% vaccinated, what does that mean?  99% vaccination rate implies unvaccinated are 42x more likely. 90% means 4x more likely.

See how things like that matter? Peter does, which is why he’s trying to be misleading and why people who don’t understand math are his target audience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And even crazier numbers today. Again, where are numbers in the totally unvaccinated???? Nah, nothing to see here. They wouldn't purposely try and hide those numbers or anything, would they? :dunno:

2,418 cases in the fully vaxxed with a booster. And some still think these vaccines are the cats ass and herd immunity is just around the corner. :crazy:

https://www.durhamradionews.com/archives/153220

image.thumb.png.c0f684f7a2be3ae8abab76ed8329d687.png

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, akvanden said:

It’s not science, it’s statistics. If the CDC is 99% vaccinated, what does that mean if 70% of the cases are in the vaccinated group?  What if the CDC is 90% vaccinated, what does that mean?  99% vaccination rate implies unvaccinated are 42x more likely. 90% means 4x more likely.

See how things like that matter? Peter does, which is why he’s trying to be misleading and why people who don’t understand math are his target audience.

I'm pretty sure the cdc vax rate isn't anywhere close to distort the data.  Face it, the vax is a failure.

 

Let me post this again then.  Show me anywhere on this chart that supports your complete ignorance for supporting the vax?  I'll wait.

 

 

FPptKW5XsAAImnL?format=jpg&name=medium

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
18 hours ago, akvanden said:

You guys are hilarious. Welcome to the super low vaccinated death rate! 

 

image.thumb.png.2583b818daa90998438c00b38585c451.png

So the unvacinated trend line is way down as well... I think you said in another post later on that the virus and its subsequent variants are getting weaker.

 So with that being said what is the advantage of getting the vaccine at this point?.... it is truly starting to turn out to be nothing more than a cold.

 , I had it at Christmas and had a rough go of it still not sure if it was from the treatments of the steroids for pneumonia or the covid itself. They seem to think it was the steroid reaction with the seizures and all ...five days in the hospital not too much fun..... some nice nurses though..lol

 But I still won't get the vaccine.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said:

I'm pretty sure the cdc vax rate isn't anywhere close to distort the data.  Face it, the vax is a failure.

We don't have to be 'pretty sure,' the data is published. The rate back in Sept for the Dept of Human Services is 96.4%, which the CDC is part of. Wonder how much higher is it today?

https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/briefing-room/2021/11/24/update-on-implementation-of-covid-19-vaccination-requirement-for-federal-employees/

11x higher infection rate at the CDC for the unvaccinated. Completely misleading information, Dr Peter knows better.

 

What's your screenshot - is it showing that Omicron is a much weaker variant? Wow, really.... Did you see the graph I posted where death rates for vaccinated and unvaccinated are merging? Weaker variants kill less?!?!?!?!?!? Fewer severe outcomes?!?!?!?!? And then low and behold, your dream will come true when there truly is a negligible difference in the two groups. And then you can dedicate your full conspiracy attention to Hunter, defending Putin, or whatever flavor is it that day. :thumbsup:

2 hours ago, ViperGTS/Z1 said:

So with that being said what is the advantage of getting the vaccine at this point?.... it is truly starting to turn out to be nothing more than a cold.

Valid question. Hope it keeps trending that way, even weaker variants emerge, etc. I personally won't be getting another booster unless things start going the other way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, akvanden said:

We don't have to be 'pretty sure,' the data is published. The rate back in Sept for the Dept of Human Services is 96.4%, which the CDC is part of. Wonder how much higher is it today?

https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/briefing-room/2021/11/24/update-on-implementation-of-covid-19-vaccination-requirement-for-federal-employees/

11x higher infection rate at the CDC for the unvaccinated. Completely misleading information, Dr Peter knows better.

 

What's your screenshot - is it showing that Omicron is a much weaker variant? Wow, really.... Did you see the graph I posted where death rates for vaccinated and unvaccinated are merging? Weaker variants kill less?!?!?!?!?!? Fewer severe outcomes?!?!?!?!? And then low and behold, your dream will come true when there truly is a negligible difference in the two groups. And then you can dedicate your full conspiracy attention to Hunter, defending Putin, or whatever flavor is it that day. :thumbsup:

Valid question. Hope it keeps trending that way, even weaker variants emerge, etc. I personally won't be getting another booster unless things start going the other way. 

  Here is the data in Ontario, from the same link you quoted above.  Just how much of a fucking idiot are you?

 

The triple vaxxed are leading the cases, it's not even close.

 

 

image.thumb.png.8a67cc90b9bfb6a9f3b4c61d84895ac0.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

  Here is the data in Ontario, from the same link you quoted above.  Just how much of a fucking idiot are you?

 

The triple vaxxed are leading the cases, it's not even close.

 

 

image.thumb.png.8a67cc90b9bfb6a9f3b4c61d84895ac0.png

 

5 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

11x my fucking ass.:lol:

Mass formation ignorance.:lol:

Thanks for the March data. You posted info from August ‘21, nearly 9 months old - again, thinking it meant one thing when completely the opposite. When 4% of the population causes 30% of the cases, it’s an 11x rate.
Math can be a funny thing, right? 
 

 

60D5E24A-654D-4C2E-AFE0-EDFA5D43F833.gif

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...