Pete Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 Speaks very clearly. Quite pretty also. But still a liberal.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted March 23, 2022 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 23, 2022 Can't define what a woman is? Kinda odd that someone with her education doesn't know that..Or in the most important job interview of her life she made the decision to be PC?? I'm guessing the latter. Don't think we need PCness taking priority in SC decisions.. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted March 23, 2022 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 23, 2022 32 minutes ago, Pete said: Speaks very clearly. Quite pretty also. But still a liberal.. History of letting pedophiles off easy. Fuck her. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ford_428cj Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 14 minutes ago, Highmark said: History of letting pedophiles off easy. Fuck her. How can any person think like that?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snoughnut Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 25 minutes ago, Highmark said: History of letting pedophiles off easy. Fuck her. That should never happen.......never, never, never. 10 minutes ago, ford_428cj said: How can any person think like that?? Because liberals are radical nut jobs. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted March 23, 2022 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 23, 2022 (edited) 40 minutes ago, Highmark said: History of letting pedophiles off easy. Fuck her. 25 minutes ago, ford_428cj said: How can any person think like that?? 13 minutes ago, snoughnut said: That should never happen.......never, never, never. Because liberals are radical nut jobs. Not true but good to know you three fell for it. https://apnews.com/article/ketanji-brown-jackson-us-supreme-court-ap-fact-check-child-pornography-josh-hawley-68d5a59edf46ea3f28e35cf32f84fe19 Edited March 23, 2022 by Jimmy Snacks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member steve from amherst Posted March 23, 2022 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 23, 2022 She talks like a politician , spends 10 minutes talking and not answering a question Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member steve from amherst Posted March 23, 2022 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 23, 2022 Just now, Jimmy Snacks said: Not true but good to know you three fell for it. https://apnews.com/article/ketanji-brown-jackson-us-supreme-court-ap-fact-check-child-pornography-josh-hawley-68d5a59edf46ea3f28e35cf32f84fe19 Come on Jim. The sentancing guidlines in that case called called for 10 yrs. The prosecuter asked for 24 months The probation report recomended 18 months. She sentanced him to 3 months and apologized to him for doing so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 11 minutes ago, Jimmy Snacks said: Not true but good to know you three fell for it. https://apnews.com/article/ketanji-brown-jackson-us-supreme-court-ap-fact-check-child-pornography-josh-hawley-68d5a59edf46ea3f28e35cf32f84fe19 Just watch her own answers and form your own conclusion, not hard really. Nope Smales has to go with the braindead BS "fact check". Atta boy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted March 23, 2022 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 23, 2022 (edited) 19 minutes ago, Jimmy Snacks said: Not true but good to know you three fell for it. https://apnews.com/article/ketanji-brown-jackson-us-supreme-court-ap-fact-check-child-pornography-josh-hawley-68d5a59edf46ea3f28e35cf32f84fe19 Dude she admitted yesterday during testimony that she went below Federal sentencing guidelines and prosecutors suggested sentencing requests because these were material crimes (child porn on computer or delivered by mail.) and not actual physical crimes. Sorry but those people who buy that shit are perpetuating the physical abuse of children. Neither the federal guidelines or what the prosecutors wanted was out of line. 90-120 months in jail for one of the worst. Pretty damn easy for someone with a computer full of child pornography. She gave them like 20. If there were no customers there would be less of it. Nice job protecting pedophiles though. Figured you may be above that but guess not. From your link and I don't care what the motivation....if you are in possession of child porn you should get the maximum as you are still supporting that "industry." But several behavioral science researchers testified at that hearing that there may be nonsexual motivations among a portion of child-sex criminals. It is not a radical view. And many judges do see a distinction between those who produce child pornography and those who receive it. Edited March 23, 2022 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ford_428cj Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 18 minutes ago, Jimmy Snacks said: Not true but good to know you three fell for it. https://apnews.com/article/ketanji-brown-jackson-us-supreme-court-ap-fact-check-child-pornography-josh-hawley-68d5a59edf46ea3f28e35cf32f84fe19 I think that vax done fried your brain son... 16 minutes ago, steve from amherst said: Come on Jim. The sentancing guidlines in that case called called for 10 yrs. The prosecuter asked for 24 months The probation report recomended 18 months. She sentanced him to 3 months and apologized to him for doing so. Smh ... No wonder Brandon wants her btw Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted March 23, 2022 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 23, 2022 20 minutes ago, steve from amherst said: Come on Jim. The sentancing guidlines in that case called called for 10 yrs. The prosecuter asked for 24 months The probation report recomended 18 months. She sentanced him to 3 months and apologized to him for doing so. Never figured Jim for a pedophile apologist. Guess you just never know people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bontz Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 Using "Fact Check" ... geezus Jim, seriously? If that isn't the biggest form of irony, I don't know what is. I suppose Hawley is a Russian asset, too, based on Fact Check findings Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snoughnut Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 27 minutes ago, steve from amherst said: Come on Jim. The sentancing guidlines in that case called called for 10 yrs. The prosecuter asked for 24 months The probation report recomended 18 months. She sentanced him to 3 months and apologized to him for doing so. 16 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: Just watch her own answers and form your own conclusion, not hard really. Nope Smales has to go with the braindead BS "fact check". Atta boy. 6 minutes ago, Highmark said: Never figured Jim for a pedophile apologist. Guess you just never know people. 5 minutes ago, Bontz said: Using "Fact Check" ... geezus Jim, seriously? If that isn't the biggest form of irony, I don't know what is. I suppose Hawley is a Russian asset, too, based on Fact Check findings That's just Jaba being a cunt, he thrives on it because he's starved for attention. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DriftBusta Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 9 minutes ago, Highmark said: Never figured Jim for a pedophile apologist. Guess you just never know people. He puts the "jerk" in knee jerk, as in how most of his opinions are formed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted March 23, 2022 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 23, 2022 (edited) 10 minutes ago, snoughnut said: That's just Jaba being a cunt, he thrives on it because he's starved for attention. Let a dude off light who was distributing pictures of his own fucking daughter! https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/mar/22/ketanji-brown-jackson-defends-sentences-child-porn/ One of the cases in question includes U.S. v. Cooper, in which Judge Jackson sentenced Ryan Cooper to the lowest sentence allowed, 60 months, for his conviction of distribution of child pornography. Federal sentencing guidelines had called for Cooper to be imprisoned for 151 to 188 months. He had posted nude photos of young boys on his Tumblr accounts, including images of three boys performing oral sex. He also had about 600 images of child pornography on a laptop. Cooper told Judge Jackson in a letter in February 2021 before his sentencing that he is a sexual abuse survivor, and that he changed his life around from his “darker” period involving child pornography. He said after his arrest that he volunteered at a soup kitchen in Washington and got a job as a software salesman and then found work with an intelligence consultant. “I am not a predator and I do not have a predilection for minors, which has been corroborated by three mental healthcare professionals,” Cooper told Judge Jackson. “I am certainly no career criminal. This will not happen again, ever.” His case is not the only one under scrutiny. In U.S. v. Stewart, Mr. Hawley said, Judge Jackson sentenced a man to 57 months in prison on his conviction of possessing thousands of images of child porn and attempting to travel across state lines to abuse a 9-year-old girl. The guidelines called for a sentence of 97 to 121 months. In U.S. v. Sears, where the guidelines called for 97 to 121 months for a man convicted of distributing 102 child porn videos and photos of his 10-year-old daughter, Judge Jackson gave him 60 months. Pushing back on the allegation she gave too light of sentences, the judge said she tells felons about how victims of child sex abuse say they never are able to have a normal relationship as adults. “For every defendant that comes before me and suggests — as they often do — that they are just a looker … they’ve collected these things on the internet and it’s fine,” she said. “I say to them, ‘There is only a market for this kind of material because there are lookers. That you are attributing to child sex abuse.’” Edited March 23, 2022 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted March 23, 2022 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 23, 2022 (edited) 20 minutes ago, Highmark said: Never figured Jim for a pedophile apologist. Guess you just never know people. I’m not and I haven’t been able to watch any of the testimony but it sure seems like her record is being twisted(from what I’ve heard) in a confirmation hearing which is shocking I know. BTW some of you losing your kinds here also explained away Trump hanging around with Epstein so there’s that. If she truly is some sort of pedophile enabler then of course she shouldn’t be confirmed. Edited March 23, 2022 by Jimmy Snacks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 Twist this. Fuck this bitch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted March 23, 2022 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 23, 2022 (edited) Apparently she is also a terrorist apologist and enabler because she was appointed to defend 4 Gitmo detainees…it’s why Goober stormed out of the hearings. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/politics/watch-supreme-court-nominee-ketanji-brown-jackson-defends-work-as-an-attorney-for-guantanamo-bay-prisoners Edited March 23, 2022 by Jimmy Snacks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted March 23, 2022 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 23, 2022 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Jimmy Snacks said: I’m not and I haven’t been able to watch any of the testimony but it sure seems like her record is being twisted(from what I’ve heard) in a confirmation hearing which is shocking I know. BTW some of you losing your kinds here also explained away Trump hanging around with Epstein so there’s that. Then do research past one article. Been down this road with Trump a number of times. Trump kicked him out of Mar-a-Lago when he found out Epstein had acted inappropriately. I also posted a video of one of the abused attorney's saying Trump was the only one to call him and offer up any help he could regarding that case. Need it posted again? https://www.independentsentinel.com/donald-trump-helped-build-a-case-against-jeffrey-epstein/ Every single other powerful person connected would do nothing of the sort. Edited March 23, 2022 by Highmark 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted March 23, 2022 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 23, 2022 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Highmark said: Then do research past one article. Been down this road with Trump a number of times. Trump kicked him out of Mar-a-Lago when he found out Epstein had acted inappropriately. I also posted a video of one of the abused attorney's saying Trump was the only one to call him and offer up any help he could regarding that case. Need it posted again? You’ve got it all figured out…don’t bother.👍🏼 BTW calling me anything pedophile related is fucked up…guess you are showing who you are as well. Edited March 23, 2022 by Jimmy Snacks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member steve from amherst Posted March 23, 2022 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 23, 2022 When they first started talking about the hawkins case and him being 18 , I thought it was going to be republicans going in full retard over a case where an 18 had sent a pic of his 17 yr old girlfriends tits to a bud. Was quite shocked to hear he had a "collection" of photo's and videos showing adults having sex with children as young as 8, who she referred to as " his peers" her words , not mine. Then she went on to talk about his " Collection " of kiddie porn like it was a fucking coin collection. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DriftBusta Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 7 minutes ago, Jimmy Snacks said: You’ve got it all figured out…don’t bother.👍🏼 BTW calling me anything pedophile related is fucked up…guess you are showing who you are as well. He proved you wrong. You can't admit it. You have yet to offer an opinion on whether Hunters laptop and the contents within it are real, and what that means. You've shown yourself pretty well too. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted March 23, 2022 Author Share Posted March 23, 2022 Pouts the center of controversy again.. all because he hates repubs.. what miserable donut 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted March 23, 2022 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 23, 2022 More bullshit and surprise, surprise, surprise…Goober!🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.