Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 31, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 31, 2017 1 minute ago, Zambroski said: OH MY GOD!!!!! Seriously! He voted for scrutiny on people from these countries in 2015. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted January 31, 2017 Author Share Posted January 31, 2017 5 minutes ago, Highmark said: He voted for scrutiny on people from these countries in 2015. why do you always try to equate an apple to an orange? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
02sled Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 I refuse to follow directions from my boss I get fired. Pretty straight forward. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold War Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 54 minutes ago, 02sled said: I refuse to follow directions from my boss I get fired. Pretty straight forward. Yeah, if we have a disagreement on how it should it be done. ....Your concerns noted, now do your job or hit the door. I don't know anyone who gets to pick and choose what directions they listen to by their boss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted January 31, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 31, 2017 drain the swamp!!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 3 minutes ago, Rigid1 said: drain the swamp!!! x2. Don't let the door hit you on the way out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 1 hour ago, 02sled said: I refuse to follow directions from my boss I get fired. Pretty straight forward. Nooooo. She swore to uphold the Constitution not Trump. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snoughnut Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 Poor Shitslinger, Mainecunt, ICEFAG, Spin nut etc., it's gonna be a rough 4 years, hopefully 8 for you pussies. Will you guys be having group therapy sessions? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
02sled Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 45 minutes ago, Mainecat said: Nooooo. She swore to uphold the Constitution not Trump. She serves at the pleasure of the president who is her boss. Her boss says this is what I want you to do. She has a couple of choices. Do it, quit or be fired. Pretty simple. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
02sled Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 48 minutes ago, snoughnut said: Poor Shitslinger, Mainecunt, ICEFAG, Spin nut etc., it's gonna be a rough 4 years, hopefully 8 for you pussies. Will you guys be having group therapy sessions? They're all in their safe places. When did this safe place thing ever start getting used for people. I knew if an animal like a dog felt threatened they would retreat to their safe place, but people, this is new Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 31, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 31, 2017 11 hours ago, Snoslinger said: why do you always try to equate an apple to an orange? I never seen him go on TV and cry when Obama banned refugee's from Iraq for 6 months in 2013. Hypocrites of the highest order. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 12 hours ago, Snoslinger said: at tooslow and creepr Most here have been laughing at you and the Liar for years 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 11 hours ago, Snoslinger said: why do you always try to equate an apple to an orange? There it is! Timeshare s go to defense for his double standards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mileage Psycho Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 12 hours ago, Snoslinger said: trump fires acting AG because she thought travel ban was unlawful and refused to act upon it. the little king no likey. She deserved to get fired, when you are the AG you serve at the presidents pleasure. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 31, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 31, 2017 8 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said: She deserved to get fired, when you are the AG you serve at the presidents pleasure. Yep. Should could have easily resigned saying she had reservations about the EO. Instead she instructed the entire JD to not uphold it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted January 31, 2017 Author Share Posted January 31, 2017 7 minutes ago, Sleepr2 said: There it is! Timeshare s go to defense for his double standards I'm not defending anything. just wondering why highmarket always tries to equate things like scrutiny of people several years ago, to travel bans now? or vetting of refugees years ago to the vetting that occurs now? maybe you can answer? 6 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said: She deserved to get fired, when you are the AG you serve at the presidents pleasure. yeah I can't really argue that. I was wondering, however, if she has any legal counterpunches? someone refusing to do something their boss tells them isn't always a legal way to fire someone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 12 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said: She deserved to get fired, when you are the AG you serve at the presidents pleasure. Well, "president's pleasure" isn't the phrase I'd use, but yes. 1 minute ago, Highmark said: Yep. Should could have easily resigned saying she had reservations about the EO. Instead she instructed the entire JD to not uphold it. It was just another political grandstanding to obstruct the law and ignore her sworn oath and the constitution. It is popular with the liberals to do so. She's not stupid though, I'm sure she'll be in the Dem "rank and file" system soon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
small-bore Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 12 hours ago, Zambroski said: She was extremely derelict of her duties and of her oath to defend the Constitution. Career ended. Now she has a lot more time to go protest. that's exactly what I was going too say. She can go join all the pathetic unemployed libtard protesters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 2 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: I'm not defending anything. just wondering why highmarket always tries to equate things like scrutiny of people several years ago, to travel bans now? or vetting of refugees years ago to the vetting that occurs now? maybe you can answer? yeah I can't really argue that. I was wondering, however, if she has any legal counterpunches? someone refusing to do something their boss tells them isn't always a legal way to fire someone. It is when it is CLEARLY in their job description and duties. Your side being able to claim more of the "gray area" and twist it into your color of the day is hopefully over. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 I personally find this thread an EXTREME GRASP. Even from the lefties in here. This is a no argument termination for someone who outright refused to perform their sword duties in the government based on her personal feelings. More credibility for the Dems is being lost on every post trying to defend her. This has NOTHING to do with your feelings on how the election went. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 31, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 31, 2017 6 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: I'm not defending anything. just wondering why highmarket always tries to equate things like scrutiny of people several years ago, to travel bans now? or vetting of refugees years ago to the vetting that occurs now? maybe you can answer? yeah I can't really argue that. I was wondering, however, if she has any legal counterpunches? someone refusing to do something their boss tells them isn't always a legal way to fire someone. Dude it was in 2015-2016. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted January 31, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 31, 2017 All the laughing quickly turned to backpedaling after Vince posted Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 31, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 31, 2017 In a nutshell Obama did something very similar he just went about it differently. According to the draft copy of Trump's executive order, the countries whose citizens are barred entirely from entering the United States is based on a bill that Obama signed into law in December 2015. Obama signed the Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act as part of an omnibus spending bill. The legislation restricted access to the Visa Waiver Program, which allows citizens from 38 countries who are visiting the United States for less than 90 days to enter without a visa. Though outside groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union and NIAC Action — the sister organization of the National Iranian American Council — opposed the act, the bipartisan bill passed through Congress with little pushback. At the initial signing of the restrictions, foreigners who would normally be deemed eligible for a visa waiver were denied if they had visited Iran, Syria, Sudan or Iraq in the past five years or held dual citizenship from one of those countries. In February 2016, the Obama administration added Libya, Somali and Yemen to the list of countries one could not have visited — but allowed dual citizens of those countries who had not traveled there access to the Visa Waiver Program. Dual citizens of Syria, Sudan, Iraq and Iran are still ineligible, however. So, in a nutshell, Obama restricted visa waivers for those seven Muslim-majority countries — Iran, Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Somalia, Libya and Yemen — and now, Trump is looking to bar immigration and visitors from the same list of countries. http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2017/01/29/news-bulletin-the-list-of-muslim-nations-in-trumps-socalled-muslim-ban-are-ones-obama-choose-n2278021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 4 minutes ago, Skidooski said: All the laughing quickly turned to backpedaling after Vince posted Fuck. He seems to be the only Dem with a reasonable thought process. A bit hacky sometimes IMO, but still, he seems to usually have a fair bead on clear "black and white" situations. In other words, he's not a typical lib-tard whiner. He's one of the exceptionals! I have a good friend just like him. We laugh our asses off busting each others chops. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 31, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 31, 2017 4 minutes ago, Zambroski said: Fuck. He seems to be the only Dem with a reasonable thought process. A bit hacky sometimes IMO, but still, he seems to usually have a fair bead on clear "black and white" situations. In other words, he's not a typical lib-tard whiner. He's one of the exceptionals! I have a good friend just like him. We laugh our asses off busting each others chops. Vince is kind of like King of the Nerds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.