Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Learn us about Communism


Anler

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, snoughnut said:

What a load of BS. Unfortunate outcome? The exploitation of slave labor is intentional, it has nothing to do with luck. Slave labor still exists today, plenty of American corps. exploit foreign labor. I have a question, when American corps. exploit foreign slave labor does that qualify as them pulling up their bootstraps? :lmao:

I figured we were talking about these ideas in their purest form? If not, I guess we'll just say Stalin's USSR defines all communism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, akvanden said:

Two parties, freely at their own will, negotiating an exchange of labor is exploitation?


Good luck trying to convince everyone who has a job that they’re a slave being exploited. That will really get them to understand where you’re coming from.

That sounds good, but that's not how it actually works. Capital has a monopsony on labor, which creates a coercive arrangement between labor and capital, not a cooperative one.

How many times do I need to say this? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
16 minutes ago, motonoggin said:

That sounds good, but that's not how it actually works. Capital has a monopsony on labor, which creates a coercive arrangement between labor and capital, not a cooperative one.

How many times do I need to say this? 

But not every business or company in the us is a monopsonistic company/business, Everyone in the world isn't working for Google, Walmart, or the coal mine in the small town that controls everything in that town..

Everything you say really seems like jealously, like you're bent that some people have prospered better than you and they should not be allowed to make more than you. Money doesn't buy happiness or respect bud..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Rigid1 said:

But not every business or company in the us is a monopsonistic company/business, Everyone in the world isn't working for Google, Walmart, or the coal mine in the small town that controls everything in that town..

Everything you say really seems like jealously, like you're bent that some people have prospered better than you and they should not be allowed to make more than you. Money doesn't buy happiness or respect bud..

Individual businesses are largely irrelevant, capital holds the monopsony as part of the way the system is structured  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member

@motonoggin don't you t you operate a monopsony? Very little competition, very few are able to be allowed to do what you do,  and buyers of your products have very few options of who they can buy from??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, motonoggin said:

That sounds good, but that's not how it actually works. Capital has a monopsony on labor, which creates a coercive arrangement between labor and capital, not a cooperative one.

How many times do I need to say this? 

You can say it as many times as you'd like. 

 

What's the alternative?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
8 minutes ago, motonoggin said:

Individual businesses are largely irrelevant, capital holds the monopsony as part of the way the system is structured  

Not really as even defined by monopsony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rigid1 said:

But not every business or company in the us is a monopsonistic company/business, Everyone in the world isn't working for Google, Walmart, or the coal mine in the small town that controls everything in that town..

Everything you say really seems like jealously, like you're bent that some people have prospered better than you and they should not be allowed to make more than you. Money doesn't buy happiness or respect bud..

Everyone has to work for a capitalist, therefore capital itself as a whole holds the monopsony. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, akvanden said:

You can say it as many times as you'd like. 

 

What's the alternative?

A system where workers own and control the means of production and have actual control of the value of their labor is what socialism prescribes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
5 minutes ago, motonoggin said:

A system where workers own and control the means of production and have actual control of the value of their labor is what socialism prescribes. 

Sounds like my business

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, motonoggin said:

A system where workers own and control the means of production and have actual control of the value of their labor is what socialism prescribes. 

The complete lack of economic understanding with you is amazing 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, motonoggin said:

A system where workers own and control the means of production and have actual control of the value of their labor is what socialism prescribes. 

Unfortunately, most either don't want to or more likely can't commit to the responsibility.  It would be equivalent to a business run 100% by family members.  Dead on arrival.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

Unfortunately, most either don't want to or more likely can't commit to the responsibility.  It would be equivalent to a business run 100% by family members.  Dead on arrival.

Plus how do you control prices without totalitarianism 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, motonoggin said:

A system where workers own and control the means of production and have actual control of the value of their labor is what socialism prescribes. 

That sounds lovely, in theory. What happens if I value my labor at a higher level then the guy standing next to me on the widget line? Do I then turn into slave labor? Or is that just the contract that I signed when I agreed to work in the socialist factory, x amount of labor for x price?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, akvanden said:

That sounds lovely, in theory. What happens if I value my labor at a higher level then the guy standing next to me on the widget line? Do I then turn into slave labor? Or is that just the contract that I signed when I agreed to work in the socialist factory, x amount of labor for x price?

Yes and yes.  In these ways, our current system of capitalism is similar.  But, in our system, your "contract" is a voluntary endeavor and can be terminated which also includes your "higher value" gets moved up to a more appropriate position and paid more accordingly.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, ACE said:

DAC36087-B072-44D2-9D7A-828842ADF906.jpeg

:lol: 

He should have never been charged for this at all.  But now, he'd be on death row for killing the man who just wanted to express his sexual feelings for a small boy.  My, how fucked up we've all become.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, akvanden said:

That sounds lovely, in theory. What happens if I value my labor at a higher level then the guy standing next to me on the widget line? Do I then turn into slave labor? Or is that just the contract that I signed when I agreed to work in the socialist factory, x amount of labor for x price?

The workplace would be a democracy, and structural details would be decided by voting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, motonoggin said:

The workplace would be a democracy, and structural details would be decided by voting. 

So, if like he questioned, he clearly feels his work is more valuable than the guy standing next to him.  Maybe it's even clear to see.  The floor would vote for......wut exactly?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Zambroski said:

So, if like he questioned, he clearly feels his work is more valuable than the guy standing next to him.  Maybe it's even clear to see.  The floor would vote for......wut exactly?

It might just work, "In the Metaverse".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, ACE said:

I think Moto is also under the false impression that people are actually equal 

This is the common denominator with many that start to illogically argue profusely about “equality”.

21 hours ago, ACE said:

Plus how do you control prices without totalitarianism 

Well, you can’t.  What happens in communism (after socialism has failed) is, as the costs rise as a direct result in reduced supply, larger and larger portions start being taken from the masses so the ones in power can maintain their lives as they say they are “figuring things out”.  It’s only. A matter of time before it crumbles.  This has been proven over and over…and over…and over and over and over….and over…

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/16/2021 at 11:44 AM, motonoggin said:

That sounds good, but that's not how it actually works. Capital has a monopsony on labor, which creates a coercive arrangement between labor and capital, not a cooperative one.

How many times do I need to say this? 

Until you get it right.. 

Don't like your job quit...if you find yourself without skills look in the fucking mirror. 

Heck you make 100k+ growing a weed that will literally grow outside by itself once sexed properly. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...