Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

The game IS rigged. Always was.


Anler

Recommended Posts

Good show and describes what a primary really is, an illusion of democracy. The squid brains will think this is only democrat corruption but if you actually watch you will learn this happened on the other side not to long ago. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Overall, we rate RT Questionable based on promoting pro-Russian propaganda, promotion of conspiracy theories, numerous failed fact checks and a lack of author transparency.

Detailed Report

Reasoning: Russian Propaganda, Conspiracy, Lack of Transparency, Some Fake News
Country: Russia
World Press Freedom Rank: Russia 148/180

History

Founded in 2005, RT, originally Russia Today, is a television network funded by the Russian government. It operates cable and satellite television channels directed to audiences outside of Russia as well as providing Internet content in various languages, including Russian. Critics of RT claim they are a source for disinformation and pro-Russian propaganda.

Read how the Russian Government influences Media.

Funded by / Ownership

RT News is owned by ANO “TV-Novosti”, which is funded by the Russian Government. The network is funded through advertising as well as 307 million USD from the Russian Government as of 2016.

Analysis / Bias

In review, RT News present news that is generally in line with the narrative of the Russian Government. When it comes to covering USA/International News they provide right of center coverage.  They are highly biased in favor of Russia and occasionally run Pro-state conspiracy stories. The Columbia Journalism Review calls RT “The Kremlin’s propaganda outlet.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/mediabiasfactcheck.com/rt-news/%3Famp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member

What happens if Sanders would drop and run as an independent?   The D's would have a tough choice.   Fix the nomination process to be fair and have a socialist win only to lose in the GE.   Lose the GE because of a Sanders independent run would take 30%+ of their votes.   :lol:  Decision.....Decisions.  :lol:  

Edited by Highmark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Highmark said:

What happens if Sanders would drop and run as an independent?   The D's would have a tough choice.   Fix the nomination process and have a socialist win only to lose in the GE.   Lose the GE because of a Sanders independent run would take 30%+ of their votes.   :lol:  Decision.....Decisions.  :lol:  

if he had any self respect he would have done that in 16.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
Just now, Angry ginger said:

if he had any self respect he would have done that in 16.  

Yep.   He would have ran as an independent from the get go.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is it so hard o understand?    Bernie is doing what he thinks is best for Bernie.   I find it astonishing people actually believe politicians care about them and are fighting for them.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Angry ginger said:

if he had any self respect he would have done that in 16.  

 

1 hour ago, Highmark said:

Yep.   He would have ran as an independent from the get go.  

Why didnt Trump run as an independent? Because everybody with a brain and knows anything about politics knows a 3rd party cant win. they wont even be allowed to participate in the debates. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Anler said:

 

Why didnt Trump run as an independent? Because everybody with a brain and knows anything about politics knows a 3rd party cant win. they wont even be allowed to participate in the debates. 

Win nope. But Bernie as a 3rd party would make the dems lose for sure 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
Just now, Anler said:

 

Why didnt Trump run as an independent? Because everybody with a brain and knows anything about politics knows a 3rd party cant win. they wont even be allowed to participate in the debates. 

Because Trumps issues he runs on match more with the majority of the Republican party and the cross over voters do than Sanders does with the historical democrat part of the blue collar democrat and crossover voters.  Bernie is trying MASSIVE changes to the party, Trump was not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ACE said:

Win nope. But Bernie as a 3rd party would make the dems lose for sure 

dems are going to lose for sure anyway. the other part about being a 3rd party is without support in congress or senate you cant get anything done because the parties wont work with you. Hence why Hillary said everybody hated Bernie and nobody wanted to work with him. He would be a lame duck president and the economy would be shit for 4 years. 

If there are going to be more parties they need to mobilize nation wide and get people elected in the house and senate. Would be better for everyone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Anler said:

 

Why didnt Trump run as an independent? Because everybody with a brain and knows anything about politics knows a 3rd party cant win. they wont even be allowed to participate in the debates. 

True, but look how the Republicans are starting to fall in line with him. They know who butters their bread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Anler said:

 

Why didnt Trump run as an independent? Because everybody with a brain and knows anything about politics knows a 3rd party cant win. they wont even be allowed to participate in the debates. 

Perot was the best candidate I ever voted for to be president of the United States.  It is too bad more did not see that because a viable 3rd party would be great for America but right now it's throwing away a vote.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
36 minutes ago, DriftBusta said:

True, but look how the Republicans are starting to fall in line with him. They know who butters their bread.

And this folks is how the framers intended it to work according to the self proclaimed 1970’s critical thinking constitutional expert. :lmao:
 

 

Edited by Jimmy Snacks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jimmy Snacks said:

And this folks is how the framers intended it to work according to the self proclaimed 1970’s critical thinking constitutional expert. :lmao:
 

 

Compared to you I could probably cure cancer. Any other dumb shit you need to get off your chest?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Angry ginger said:

Perot was the best candidate I ever voted for to be president of the United States.  It is too bad more did not see that because a viable 3rd party would be great for America but right now it's throwing away a vote.  

Perot is the reason 3rd parties aren't allowed in the debates. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...