Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 30, 2020 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 30, 2020 Jesus when Vice comes out against a Dem you know its a dumb idea. Ever hear their commercials on TV? Wow as liberal as it gets. https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/pkeamz/elizabeth-warrens-plan-to-combat-misinformation-could-help-ruin-the-internet https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/29/warren-proposes-criminal-penalties-for-spreading-disinformation-online.html Elizabeth Warren proposes criminal penalties for spreading voting disinformation online Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
01mxz800 Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 Warren has about as much of a chance of getting the nod as Custer had at little big horn 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted January 30, 2020 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 30, 2020 Just now, 01mxz800 said: Warren has about as much of a chance of getting the nod as Custer had at little big horn Haha, that was a good one!!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XC.Morrison Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 I really like it. Unless your love spreading false information about the time, place, or location that people are to vote in an attempt to suppress voting or don't think social media giants that want to have all the freedoms of other journalistic entities but none of the responsibilities then all I see is needless panic. https://elizabethwarren.com/plans/fighting-digital-disinformation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 The whole party is full of fascist imbeciles. Yes, this seems like It could really morph into great things. I think Goebbels would probably think so also. “.....hold social media platforms accountable for disinformation......allowing the government to penalize services that host disinformation.” All the government (well, the party in power or the ones wanting power) needs to do is decide which “disinformation” will be allowed, and which “disinformation” will be penalized. ”disinformation” = Ideas/opinions/differing viewpoints/criticism. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 30, 2020 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 30, 2020 (edited) 5 minutes ago, XC.Morrison said: I really like it. Unless your love spreading false information about the time, place, or location that people are to vote in an attempt to suppress voting or don't think social media giants that want to have all the freedoms of other journalistic entities but none of the responsibilities then all I see is needless panic. https://elizabethwarren.com/plans/fighting-digital-disinformation Needs to be kept in the civil courts.....not criminal courts. And just whom decides whats disinformation enough to bring criminal charges? No chance at politics coming into those decisions. Edited January 30, 2020 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XC.Morrison Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 3 minutes ago, Highmark said: Needs to be kept in the civil courts.....not criminal courts. And just whom decides whats disinformation enough to bring criminal charges? No chance at politics coming into those decisions. It’s pretty easy to determine things that are patently false, ie: You can vote via text by texting blah blah to blah blah. That’s simply not currently true. Civil forfeitures aren’t enough to deter as the truly evil just consider it the cost of doing business. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 30, 2020 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 30, 2020 4 minutes ago, XC.Morrison said: It’s pretty easy to determine things that are patently false, ie: You can vote via text by texting blah blah to blah blah. That’s simply not currently true. Civil forfeitures aren’t enough to deter as the truly evil just consider it the cost of doing business. Come on you know it wouldn't come down to just the obvious ones. It would go much, much further. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 16 minutes ago, Highmark said: Needs to be kept in the civil courts.....not criminal courts. And just whom decides whats disinformation enough to bring criminal charges? No chance at politics coming into those decisions. Who decides? Well, the same people that will decide if you are mentally stable enough to own a fire arm. Who better to decide this than the government of course! “Everybody who wants to own a fire arm is mentally unstable.” It all makes sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irv Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 30, 2020 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 30, 2020 Just now, Zambroski said: Who decides? Well, the same people that will decide if you are mentally stable enough to own a fire arm. Who better to decide this than the government of course! “Everybody who wants to own a fire arm is mentally unstable.” It all makes sense. Yep, govt needs to decide everything in our lives. That's what people who support the dems obviously think. Here the best part. They will say well some people need that "control" over their lives without thinking of the overall consequences on their own lives. Funny thing is I agree some people probably would benefit from more govt control over their lives however the overall implications for everyone are far more damaging than the benefit to those that need it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted January 30, 2020 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 30, 2020 I'm all in favor of letting my government decide what is true and what is false. That would make my life just that much easier! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 7 minutes ago, Highmark said: Yep, govt needs to decide everything in our lives. That's what people who support the dems obviously think. Here the best part. They will say well some people need that "control" over their lives without thinking of the overall consequences on their own lives. Funny thing is I agree some people probably would benefit from more govt control over their lives however the overall implications for everyone are far more damaging than the benefit to those that need it. I agree. Some people can’t manage their basic day to day lives and would benefit from strict laws that made than adhere to smarter practices. But really, that’s not what the left is pushing....they want to punish those that can manage their lives and succeed in a “if I can’t have it, nobody can” scenario. But remember, all these “laws” will be “for the greater good”. More atrocities toward human rights have been sold under that phrase than any other. See: “Socialism”. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 Just now, Skidooski said: I'm all in favor of letting my government decide what is true and what is false. That would make my life just that much easier! Give CNN a test try first. Try it before you buy it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 30, 2020 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 30, 2020 Just now, Zambroski said: I agree. Some people can’t manage their basic day to day lives and would benefit from strict laws that made than adhere to smarter practices. But really, that’s not what the left is pushing....they want to punish those that can manage their lives and succeed in a “if I can’t have it, nobody can” scenario. But remember, all these “laws” will be “for the greater good”. More atrocities toward human rights have been sold under that phrase than any other. See: “Socialism”. Absolutely amazing people can't see this. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry ginger Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 How about criminal penalties when your a lie about your ethnicity to get ahead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XC.Morrison Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 21 minutes ago, Highmark said: Come on you know it wouldn't come down to just the obvious ones. It would go much, much further. Yeah, yeah...everything is a slippery slope. Gun registration is a slippery slope to communism, gay marriage is a slippery slope to beastiality marriage, etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 Love the thread title. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 8 minutes ago, Angry ginger said: How about criminal penalties when your a lie about your ethnicity to get ahead. Ooof! Imagine somebody in her crowd asking her that on camera. You’d only see that on Fox though.....and that’s the truth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 Democrats: Unless it is strictly authorized it is forbidden. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 2 minutes ago, Snake said: Democrats: Unless it is strictly authorized it is forbidden. Liberals love fascism Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 30, 2020 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 30, 2020 1 hour ago, Angry ginger said: How about criminal penalties when your a lie about your ethnicity to get ahead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XC.Morrison Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 5 minutes ago, Snake said: Democrats: Unless it is strictly authorized it is forbidden. Republicans: Show me where in the Constitution it says that Trump can’t extort foreign countries to cheat in an election. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmo Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 6 minutes ago, XC.Morrison said: Republicans: Show me where in the Constitution it says that Trump can’t extort foreign countries to cheat in an election. Wonder why Bidens name came up when they were talking about corruption? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 6 minutes ago, XC.Morrison said: Republicans: Show me where in the Constitution it says that Trump can’t extort foreign countries to cheat in an election. Show me where someone who used misinformation to get ahead in life gets the gaul to call out misinformation? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.