jtssrx Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Usedtoskidoo Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 yup Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted April 23, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted April 23, 2019 I found out thru the media like the rest of you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 Did he have them in a bottom desk drawer you gullible Luddite? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 54 minutes ago, revkevsdi said: Did he have them in a bottom desk drawer you gullible Luddite? They were actually pizza recipes 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 54 minutes ago, revkevsdi said: Did he have them in a bottom desk drawer you gullible Luddite? You mean this didn't happen? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtralettucetomatoe580 Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 Does anyone else have this story other than Judicial watch? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 54 minutes ago, Snake said: You mean this didn't happen? When does judicial watch lie???? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old indy Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 (edited) 2 hours ago, revkevsdi said: Did he have them in a bottom desk drawer you gullible Luddite? He and his staff sure must have had them hidden since it IS cause to bring Barry up on charges of lying to congress. again. Jeanine Pirro pointed this out a loooooooong time ago so i dont have much hope of this gaining traction now. one can only hope 🤞 Edited April 23, 2019 by old indy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franks pond Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 Remember the maid found the Rose law firm billing records in the closet next to the shoes what ten years after they were subpoenaed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snopro31 Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 Trumps fault Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted April 24, 2019 Share Posted April 24, 2019 4 hours ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said: Does anyone else have this story other than Judicial watch? yes https://ijr.com/former-fbi-official-recovered-some-missing-clinton-emails-in-obama-wh/ https://www.worldtribune.com/fbi-official-missing-hillary-clinton-emails-found-in-obama-white-house/ https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/fbi-found-hillary-clintons-emails-in-obama-white-house-former-top-official-says https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/04/huge-fbi-admits-hillary-clinton-emails-found-in-obama-white-house-in-the-executive-office-of-the-president/ and many more CNN you ask. well you know the answer to that already Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted April 24, 2019 Share Posted April 24, 2019 32 minutes ago, Ez ryder said: yes https://ijr.com/former-fbi-official-recovered-some-missing-clinton-emails-in-obama-wh/ https://www.worldtribune.com/fbi-official-missing-hillary-clinton-emails-found-in-obama-white-house/ https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/fbi-found-hillary-clintons-emails-in-obama-white-house-former-top-official-says https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/04/huge-fbi-admits-hillary-clinton-emails-found-in-obama-white-house-in-the-executive-office-of-the-president/ and many more CNN you ask. well you know the answer to that already You left out the world net daily Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted April 24, 2019 Share Posted April 24, 2019 6 minutes ago, spin_dry said: You left out the world net daily and the other 5 pages of links from a basic Google search . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted April 24, 2019 Share Posted April 24, 2019 1 minute ago, Ez ryder said: and the other 5 pages of links from a basic Google search . Yeah ok. Grand jury next week Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racinfarmer Posted April 24, 2019 Share Posted April 24, 2019 4 hours ago, Carlos Danger said: Remember the maid found the Rose law firm billing records in the closet next to the shoes what ten years after they were subpoenaed. Kind of an odd thing to be hiding, then suddenly turn up with a bunch of Hillary's stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtralettucetomatoe580 Posted April 24, 2019 Share Posted April 24, 2019 2 hours ago, Ez ryder said: yes https://ijr.com/former-fbi-official-recovered-some-missing-clinton-emails-in-obama-wh/ https://www.worldtribune.com/fbi-official-missing-hillary-clinton-emails-found-in-obama-white-house/ https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/fbi-found-hillary-clintons-emails-in-obama-white-house-former-top-official-says https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/04/huge-fbi-admits-hillary-clinton-emails-found-in-obama-white-house-in-the-executive-office-of-the-president/ and many more CNN you ask. well you know the answer to that already Just sayin... If even Fox, as partisan as they are, doesn’t pick it up, I find it questionable. Not saying it didn’t happen, but when accountable partisan entities say no to running a story, I pause before I take it as fact. Fox, is not even handed with their coverage, but they are held to at least some standards. If this was true, why don’t they have it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted April 24, 2019 Share Posted April 24, 2019 6 hours ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said: Just sayin... If even Fox, as partisan as they are, doesn’t pick it up, I find it questionable. Not saying it didn’t happen, but when accountable partisan entities say no to running a story, I pause before I take it as fact. Fox, is not even handed with their coverage, but they are held to at least some standards. If this was true, why don’t they have it? We already know Obama and her used the email system together. Already proof of that. Why would there NOT be emails on his system that didin't get wiped? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted April 24, 2019 Share Posted April 24, 2019 Bill Priestap served along with Andrew McCabe and Peter Strzok under James "Reverend Spike" Comey at the FBI. It was Strzok himself who deposed Hillary in the e-mail server investigation and declared "nothing to see here, move along." And that was when Comey got in front of the TV cameras, listed all of Hillary's crimes and declared - without any standing or authority to do so - that there was no intent and that she's fit to be president. But then, while we were all drinking in the delicious tears of Leftists and dipping our nether regions into a large cup of tapioca when Hillary lost, that group of traitors - after the big burly black dude sedated her with the giant syringe of chloral hydrate and Val-U-Rite - got to work immediately concocting what Strzok called "the insurance policy" Russia collusion hoax. Even now, knowing all of this and having probably written about it in one form or another at least a couple of times a week for well over a year and a half as the truth came out in dribs and drabs, to reread what I just wrote turns my stomach. The people charged with upholding our Constitution, ensuring our national security and, as best they could, impartially going after even the most public of figures regardless of their political affiliations or power, absolutely violated their oaths and abused our legal and national security apparatuses in order to cover up the borderline treasonous crimes of their preferred candidate while using the aforementioned to persecute, railroad and ultimately try to overthrow the legitimate election of President Trump. And then there's the lives they ruined (Flynn and Manafort) in order to do this. All of that is horrendous enough. But whatever veneer of trust the American people had in these institutions which, along with that piece of paper so cavalierly mocked and disregarded ensures societal cohesion, has been seriously damaged, most likely irreparably. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted April 24, 2019 Share Posted April 24, 2019 (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that, in a ruling excoriating both the U.S. Departments of State and Justice, U.S. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth has ordered both agencies to join Judicial Watch in submitting a proposed schedule for discovery into whether Hillary Clinton sought to evade the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by using a private email system and whether the State Department acted in “bad faith” by failing to disclose knowledge of the email system. The decision comes in a FOIA lawsuit related to the Benghazi terrorist attack. [T]he Court ORDERS the parties to meet and confer to plan discovery into (a) whether Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email while Secretary of State was an intentional attempt to evade FOIA; (b) whether the State Department’s attempts to settle this case in late 2014 and early 2015 amounted to bad faith; and (c) whether State has adequately searched for records responsive to Judicial Watch’s requests. Terming Clinton’s use of her private email system, “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency,” Lamberth wrote in his MEMORANDUM OPINION: [H]is [President Barack Obama’s] State and Justice Departments fell far short. So far short that the court questions, even now, whether they are acting in good faith. Did Hillary Clinton use her private email as Secretary of State to thwart this lofty goal [Obama announced standard for transparency]? Was the State Department’s attempt to settle this FOIA case in 2014 an effort to avoid searching – and disclosing the existence of – Clinton’s missing emails? And has State ever adequately searched for records in this case? *** At best, State’s attempt to pass-off its deficient search as legally adequate during settlement negotiations was negligence born out of incompetence. At worst, career employees in the State and Justice Departments colluded to scuttle public scrutiny of Clinton, skirt FOIA, and hoodwink this Court. Turning his attention to the Department of Justice, Lamberth wrote: The current Justice Department made things worse. When the government last appeared before the Court, counsel claimed, ‘it is not true to say we misled either Judicial Watch or the Court.’ When accused of ‘doublespeak,’ counsel denied vehemently, feigned offense, and averred complete candor. When asked why State masked the inadequacy of its initial search, counsel claimed that the officials who initially responded to Judicial Watch’s request didn’t realize Clinton’s emails were missing, and that it took them two months to ‘figure out what was going on’… Counsel’s responses strain credulity. [citations omitted] The Court granted discovery because the government’s response to the Judicial Watch Benghazi FOIA request for Clinton emails “smacks of outrageous conduct.” Citing an email (uncovered as a result of Judicial Watch’s lawsuit) that Hillary Clinton acknowledged that Benghazi was a terrorist attack immediately after it happened, Judge Lamberth asked: Did State know Clinton deemed the Benghazi attack terrorism hours after it happened, contradicting the Obama Administration’s subsequent claim of a protest-gone-awry? **** Did the Department merely fear what might be found? Or was State’s bungling just the unfortunate result of bureaucratic redtape and a failure to communicate? To preserve the Department’s integrity, and to reassure the American people their government remains committed to transparency and the rule of law, this suspicion cannot be allowed to fester. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted April 24, 2019 Share Posted April 24, 2019 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Snake said: Bill Priestap served along with Andrew McCabe and Peter Strzok under James "Reverend Spike" Comey at the FBI. It was Strzok himself who deposed Hillary in the e-mail server investigation and declared "nothing to see here, move along." And that was when Comey got in front of the TV cameras, listed all of Hillary's crimes and declared - without any standing or authority to do so - that there was no intent and that she's fit to be president. But then, while we were all drinking in the delicious tears of Leftists and dipping our nether regions into a large cup of tapioca when Hillary lost, that group of traitors - after the big burly black dude sedated her with the giant syringe of chloral hydrate and Val-U-Rite - got to work immediately concocting what Strzok called "the insurance policy" Russia collusion hoax. Even now, knowing all of this and having probably written about it in one form or another at least a couple of times a week for well over a year and a half as the truth came out in dribs and drabs, to reread what I just wrote turns my stomach. The people charged with upholding our Constitution, ensuring our national security and, as best they could, impartially going after even the most public of figures regardless of their political affiliations or power, absolutely violated their oaths and abused our legal and national security apparatuses in order to cover up the borderline treasonous crimes of their preferred candidate while using the aforementioned to persecute, railroad and ultimately try to overthrow the legitimate election of President Trump. And then there's the lives they ruined (Flynn and Manafort) in order to do this. All of that is horrendous enough. But whatever veneer of trust the American people had in these institutions which, along with that piece of paper so cavalierly mocked and disregarded ensures societal cohesion, has been seriously damaged, most likely irreparably. There was certainly a lot of questionable shit going on to try and get another Clinton in the White House Edited April 24, 2019 by racer254 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted April 24, 2019 Share Posted April 24, 2019 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted April 24, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted April 24, 2019 15 hours ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said: Does anyone else have this story other than Judicial watch? Yes. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/fbi-found-hillary-clintons-emails-in-obama-white-house-former-top-official-says%3f_amp=true Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DriftBusta Posted April 24, 2019 Share Posted April 24, 2019 Awesome Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.