irv

That is what they are basing their science on. What the public wants and believes. Fill people with relentless fear and then wonder why so many are suffering with anxiety and depression.

I agree. Our 2 opposition parties here in Ontario are pushing mask mandates again against our Conservative party. If people can't see this is political, they never will. The thing is, with mask mandates lifted, I still see about a 60-40 to 70-30 split with those still wearing masks. It's amazing what fabricated fear will do to some people..

Global warming,,, no doubt about it.

Anler posts a vid of the media and gov't telling you right to your face they are making things up and spreading propaganda fake/false news about Putin and some still don't believe it.

Republican State, and all he ever does... "It actually doesn’t matter to me. But it’s fun to kick at the nest and see who comes out to play"

"WITH COVID" Effect of Early Treatment with Ivermectin among Patients with Covid-19. Ivermectin was never, that I know of, a treatment in those who had already contracted covid. It was meant as a preventative approach like eating properly, taking vitamin D and C+ Zinc, exercise, sunshine, or in other words, all the things the gov't and their funded media never mentioned. What's so hard to believe about these studies? "Our study aimed to describe SARS-CoV2 infection and death rates in African countries that participated in an intensive Ivermectin mass campaign carried out to control onchocerciasis and compare them with those of countries that did not participate" "Results: After controlling for different factors, including the Human Development Index (HDI), APOC countries (vs. non-APOC), show 28% lower mortality (0.72; 95% CI: 0.67-0.78) and 8% lower rate of infection (0.92; 95% CI: 0.91-0.93) due to COVID-19" "Conclusions: The incidence in mortality rates and number of cases is significantly lower among the APOC countries compared to non-APOC countries. That a mass public health preventive campaign against COVID-19 may have taken place, inadvertently, in some African countries with massive community ivermectin use is an attractive hypothesis". https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33795896/ Another study from the National Institute of Health. Results and discussion Our study compared the incidence of COVID-19 among countries with different PCT campaigns and those countries in which PCT is non-existent. It is perhaps obvious that the latter group is by far the largest. It should also not be surprising that this set of samples had a rather large variability (Fig. 1 ). However, in spite of this, the difference between nations that deploy PCT using ivermectin and those that do not use any PCT turned out to be highly significant (adjusted significance P < 0.01). These initial results were obtained on 15 April 2020 and because at that time SARS-CoV-2 was still being detected in new countries on an almost daily basis, we chose to monitor the situation and observe whether this correlation would over time become less significant. We updated our calculations and added additional newly affected countries several times throughout the month of May 2020 and noticed that the observed association between ivermectin MDA and lower COVID-19 incidence actually grew strictly stronger over time. By 5 June 2020, the adjusted significance had improved to P < 0.001, actually reported by IBM SPSS Statistics as 0.000. It has remained at that level since. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7698683/ And another one. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1....26.21254377v1 "Conclusions The morbidity and mortality in the onchocerciasis endemic countries are lesser than those in the non-endemic ones. The community-directed onchocerciasis treatment with ivermectin is the most reasonable explanation for the decrease in morbidity and fatality rate in Africa. In areas where ivermectin is distributed to and used by the entire population, it leads to a significant reduction in mortality"

Good video. Thanks for posting it up.

Besttest vaccine ever!!!

Your link is underlined so I'm not sure why it didn't load?

And proceeded to take the credit for the work the CDN's had already done.

Well, I guess we'll have to agree to disagree then. Your economy was booming, businesses were coming back, your 401K's were doing great. All this costs money to get things like this happening. I think if he had of gotten another 4yrs, with no lock downs/covid relief B.S., things would be much different for you guys right now.

I know the shit show we have up here and I knew the same was going to happen to you guys once Biden and the Dems got in so I have a hard time believing Trump is to blame for all that is happening currently to the U.S. Imo, he did a lot of good things. He stood for his country and genuinely cared for its citizens. Was he perfect, no, but he was, by and far, better than the moron before him and the one currently running the show.

A friend dropped by the other day to borrow something and told me he knows 2 guys who have turned in their fairly new/new trucks. Said one wasn't paying a $1.65+ a litre and the other was getting out while the getting was good. We didn't have a lot of time so I never got into details with him, but I know he wasn't making it up.

It certainly does and certainly exposes the big lie we have all been fed for the last 30-40 yrs.

I think, but could be wrong, if it weren't for covid, 2 attempted impeachments, Stormy, tax returns, collusion and just about anything else the Dems and their funded media could throw at him, I think he would have done more that he wanted to get done? I know you despise the man but I bet the vast majority now realize he wasn't all that bad compared to the shit show they now have.

Chronic liar, and then some.

Book: One that helps keep my sanity. Movie: Man on Fire Album: Skynyrd Gold and Platinum.

Another tremendous day showing everyone how great the vaccines, especially with the booster, are working. https://www.durhamradionews.com/archives/153289?unapproved=67968&moderation-hash=a8cef52b719c098e0698de0b2832d7e7#comment-67968

Another tremendous day showing everyone how great these vaccines, especially with a booster, are working. https://www.durhamradionews.com/archives/153289?unapproved=67968&moderation-hash=a8cef52b719c098e0698de0b2832d7e7#comment-67968

Liberalism is destroying the world. How some still can't see this is beyond me.

B.S. It's your business what you do but in order for JT to get banned, it's of my opinion he exposed something that showed you had a vested interest in all this. Not once, despite all the info that has been presented to you, have you agreed with anything here. Just look at yesterdays numbers for example, 2,418 covid cases in the fully vaxxed with a booster compared to just 482 "not fully vaccinated" "725 fully vaccinated cases in the hospital compared to just 185 in the unvaccinated" and "67 in the ICU compared to just 29" in the unvaccinated. https://www.durhamradionews.com/archives/153220 If you've been paying attention, the numbers in the fully vaccinated with the booster has been increasing exponentially as have the numbers of fully vaccinated in the hospital and ICU. Please tell me when, if ever, we've had a vaccine like this before? I won't even touch on all the known side effects either.

I'm not exactly sure what JT exposed about ak, but I do believe it was the "vested" "monetary" interests he has in these vaccines and/or pharmaceuticals. Meaning, no matter what you present to him, in order to keep his cash flow going, he will do anything to try to debunk anything said negatively about them.