Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Repugs.....the Utlimate Hypocrites.......


Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, DriftBusta said:

:rolleyes:  Seriously?

absolutely,

lets look at the chart the Trumpets love to pull out showing all the counties that went to trump then realize that those counties for the most part have no one in them.  Trumps squeaked by because he concentrated on the right handful of states,  had he had to spend time everywhere because all votes are equal he may have still won but we will never know.  He played the game the way the rules were set but the rules should change. Everyone vote is equally important and a winner take all EC state(all but ME and NB) marginalizes the voters within the state who didn't support the winning candidate.  CA is a great example of that considering 4.5 million Californians voted for trump and their vote did not matter.  At a min the EC votes should be distributed proportionally.  

 

 

election-2016-county-map.png?resize=600,

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Angry ginger said:

so their vote should not be equal to everyone elses.  Reality is with todays tech the popular vote winner should win the presidency.  Pubs would hate that because the EC keeps their states more relevant than they should really be at the expense of a state like CA.  

You start doing drugs? That's MC stupid right there...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DAVE said:

No it shouldnt....why should 2 states rule the people?

 

1 hour ago, DriftBusta said:

:rolleyes:  Seriously?

 

1 hour ago, jammin said:

Right?       :flush:

 

1 hour ago, Zambroski said:

Please delete.  Thanks.

You just cluing into the FACT this retard is a complete clown :guzzle: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
44 minutes ago, Angry ginger said:

absolutely,

lets look at the chart the Trumpets love to pull out showing all the counties that went to trump then realize that those counties for the most part have no one in them.  Trumps squeaked by because he concentrated on the right handful of states,  had he had to spend time everywhere because all votes are equal he may have still won but we will never know.  He played the game the way the rules were set but the rules should change. Everyone vote is equally important and a winner take all EC state(all but ME and NB) marginalizes the voters within the state who didn't support the winning candidate.  CA is a great example of that considering 4.5 million Californians voted for trump and their vote did not matter.  At a min the EC votes should be distributed proportionally.  

 

 

election-2016-county-map.png?resize=600,

 

 

By congressional district/popular

Trump still won 290-248.  :lol:  

Romney wins in 2012 274-264

https://www.270towin.com/alternative-electoral-college-allocation-methods/?year=2016

In fact Trump wins no matter how you sort it except optimal democrat which I have no idea what that means.  

 

Edited by Highmark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Zambroski said:

Who wears it best?  The Republican asset on the left or, the one on the right?  Same?

:lol:

 

SR Waters.jpg

Tough call. Actually an improvement over the   jethro table cloth shirt.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Cold War said:

Tough call. Actually an improvement over the   jethro table cloth shirt.   

I thought about making that part of it but I don't want to spend more than a minute or two drawing this shit up.   :lol: 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Angry ginger said:

absolutely,

lets look at the chart the Trumpets love to pull out showing all the counties that went to trump then realize that those counties for the most part have no one in them.  Trumps squeaked by because he concentrated on the right handful of states,  had he had to spend time everywhere because all votes are equal he may have still won but we will never know.  He played the game the way the rules were set but the rules should change. Everyone vote is equally important and a winner take all EC state(all but ME and NB) marginalizes the voters within the state who didn't support the winning candidate.  CA is a great example of that considering 4.5 million Californians voted for trump and their vote did not matter.  At a min the EC votes should be distributed proportionally.  

 

 

election-2016-county-map.png?resize=600,

 

 

Sorry, the rules won’t be changing.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Angry ginger said:

because the right wants to disenfranchise voters. :snack:  

Cuz the right are the ones advocating for illegals, fellons and people without identification to vote :guzzle: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, DAVE said:

No it shouldnt....why should 2 states rule the people?

Why should the minority rule over the majority?  

By the way, this could really be a debate topic all it’s own. The original form of the electoral college never allowed for someone to win the popular vote yet lose the electoral.  Hell, people didn’t even vote for president, but rather for the elector of their choice.  Then through various amendments, along with “winner take all” systems at the state level, you end up with half the votes in battleground states essentially being tossed in the trash.  How do they do it up in maple country?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, XC.Morrison said:

Why should the minority rule over the majority?  

By the way, this could really be a debate topic all it’s own. The original form of the electoral college never allowed for someone to win the popular vote yet lose the electoral.  Hell, people didn’t even vote for president, but rather for the elector of their choice.  Then through various amendments, along with “winner take all” systems at the state level, you end up with half the votes in battleground states essentially being tossed in the trash.  How do they do it up in maple country?

Exactly...why should 2 states rule...glad we agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member

One person.  One vote.  Period.  Why should some hickmin rural America’s vote count more than an educated New Yorker...:news:

 

The hicks gave us W and Dump....enough said :lmao: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, SnowRider said:

One person.  One vote.  Period.  Why should some hickmin rural America’s vote count more than an educated New Yorker...:news:

 

The hicks gave us W and Dump....enough said :lmao: 

Fucking idiot.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...