revkevsdi Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 7 minutes ago, FAT DAVE said: Are you retarded? Serious question... But Alberta Auditor-General Merwan Saher has warned of a long-term risk to taxpayers, saying in a 2015 report that if the program does not ensure that enough financial security is provided by mine operators, “the province is at risk of having to pay substantial amounts of public money” for the eventual cleanup. You are if you think the Companies that made money off the oil sands are going to pay 23 billion to clean up their mess when they only have 1.3 billion in reserve. They'll funnel the money away, declare bankruptcy and the taxpayer will be paying for it. In BP's Final $20 Billion Gulf Settlement, U.S. Taxpayers Subsidize ... Just like BP taking personal responsibility and paying 20 billion to clean up their 60 billion dollar mistake. Yet the right wing scream about health care and food for the poorest people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Edmo said: I bet you don't have an issue with the Saudis giving her charity 25 mil. Did charity watch look into that? Those Saudis are so nice, I bet they didn't expect anything in return either. so obviously legal donations to the clinton foundation is bad, but trump getting direct assistance from the russian gov to win an election is ok? this is one of many reasons the left laughs their asses off at some of you Edited July 16, 2017 by Snoslinger 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: so obviously legal donations to the clinton foundation is bad, but trump getting direct assistance from the russian gov to win an election is ok? LOL! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 2 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: so obviously legal donations to the clinton foundation is bad, but trump getting direct assistance from the russian gov to win an election is ok? this is one of many reasons the left laughs their asses off at some of you So Snot is actually falling for the ultimate lie what a gullible no mind clown hack Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 3 minutes ago, Momorider said: So Snot is actually falling for the ultimate lie what a gullible no mind clown hack yep, this all a dnc set-up apparently Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: yep, this all a dnc set-up apparently How's it fell to be 100% 100% of the time about everything for over two years faggot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 8 minutes ago, Momorider said: Charity watch is the snopes of fact checking and Oh no someone counters the right wing lies about the Clintons they must be full of shit. Man those evil Clintons knew they were going to rip people off in 1992 and had someone make up a bogus Charity watch so they could clear them of any wrongdoing 25 years later. Do you have a reliable charity auditor that compares the Trump and Clinton foundations? Or do all your posts have the same substance as what is coming out of that Bull. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmo Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: so obviously legal donations to the clinton foundation is bad, but trump getting direct assistance from the russian gov to win an election is ok? this is one of many reasons the left laughs their asses off at some of you One is a fact and one is speculation. 25 million is a lot of cheese. Don't tell me there wasn't expectations there. That's just silly... Edited July 16, 2017 by Edmo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 2 minutes ago, Edmo said: One is a fact and one is speculation. 25 million is s lot of cheese. Don't tell me there wasn't expectations there. That's just silly... exactly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 26 minutes ago, revkevsdi said: A more accurate cartoon would be to show a President handing out money while people watch. He'd give $1,000.00 to a banker, $1,000.00 to an oil exec. $1,000.00 to an arms dealer but when he hands $10.00 to a homeless guy everyone loses their shit and starts screaming about bootstraps and personal responsibility. What do the banker, oil exec and arms dealer provide vs. the homeless guy? I almost typed "don't answer" because I don't want to know how much you actually don't know...but I actually want to know. Here's a real small hint...they provided the $10 the homeless guy got. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 4 minutes ago, Zambroski said: What do the banker, oil exec and arms dealer provide vs. the homeless guy? I almost typed "don't answer" because I don't want to know how much you actually don't know...but I actually want to know. Here's a real small hint...they provided the $10 the homeless guy got. kickbacks? returned favors? campaign donation resources? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted July 16, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 16, 2017 15 minutes ago, Zambroski said: What do the banker, oil exec and arms dealer provide vs. the homeless guy? I almost typed "don't answer" because I don't want to know how much you actually don't know...but I actually want to know. Here's a real small hint...they provided the $10 the homeless guy got. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 Just now, SnowRider said: You can answer the question for Rev if you want.....I do believe you are a self proclaimed economic expert as sub-category of the "intellectually elite". QUICK...GO GOOGLE SOMETHING and claim it to be "your thoughts". Moron lib-tards.....eeking their way through life. If we could all just LISTEN to them!!!!!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 8 minutes ago, SnowRider said: Libtard theory, waste money on utopian feel good programs and when they fail blame it on lack of funding and the evil rich that already pay 80% of the cost to,run the country Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mileage Psycho Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 23 hours ago, FAT DAVE said: http://debatepost.com/2017/07/12/trudeau-government-announces-241-5-million-donation-to-the-clinton-foundation/ Good stuff. Quote Canada’s announcement of funding of up to $241.5 million at the Family Planning Summit will support projects that will provide critical sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services and information and advance gender equality and the empowerment of women and girls. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mileage Psycho Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 Just now, Sleepr2 said: Libtard theory, waste money on utopian feel good programs and when they fail blame it on lack of funding and the evil rich that already pay 80% of the cost to,run the country Will you become part of the evil rich anytime soon? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 3 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said: Will you become part of the evil rich anytime soon? What does that have to,do,with libtards defending government waste and blaming the people that pay the most? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mileage Psycho Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 9 minutes ago, Sleepr2 said: What does that have to,do,with libtards defending government waste and blaming the people that pay the most? You brought up the evil rich, maybe you will be there soon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 3 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said: You brought up the evil rich, maybe you will be there soon Maybe you'll be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 1 hour ago, Snoslinger said: so obviously legal donations to the clinton foundation is bad, but trump getting direct assistance from the russian gov to win an election is ok? this is one of many reasons the left laughs their asses off at some of you Still on that. Lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franks pond Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 2 hours ago, Mileage Psycho said: You brought up the evil rich, maybe you will be there soon Another fail for the silver spoon boy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franks pond Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted July 16, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 16, 2017 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franks pond Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.