SSFB Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 7 minutes ago, Rod said: If you call the current DNC liberals then yes 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 2 minutes ago, SSFB said: 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member EvilBird Posted March 4 Gold Member Share Posted March 4 36 minutes ago, Rod said: If you call the current DNC liberals then yes Exactly . Thinking todays Democrat Party is the same as 20/ 30/ 40 years ago is retarded 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSFB Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 1 hour ago, EvilBird said: Exactly . Thinking todays Democrat Party is the same as 20/ 30/ 40 years ago is retarded Nobody said or implied anything like that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 7 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said: Right. The fact they even tried says all you need to know. Explains why you keep trying to make shit up. 11 hours ago, Mainecat said: I bring at least 12 illegals with me most looking for abortions. As expected Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 11 hours ago, SSFB said: US Intelligence agencies have a long historical record of being in support of leftists and liberals after all. They have a long history of rigging elections in other countries. But they would never do that in the US to get the result they prefer, scouts honor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 If it was rigged tell us how. I'll give you a hint. The answer that it must be because you have faith is not a reason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 4 hours ago, Deephaven said: If it was rigged tell us how. I'll give you a hint. The answer that it must be because you have faith is not a reason. They are trying to make fraud easier, yet you only defend it to argue against someone on this board. Talk about misguided. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Steve753 Posted March 4 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 4 8 minutes ago, racer254 said: They are trying to make fraud easier, yet you only defend it to argue against someone on this board. Talk about misguided. Wouldn't that make it easier for Trump to win as well? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 Is it because you think your intelligence agencies can't rig an election or they wouldn't? Some seriously stupid gullible people here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 30 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: Is it because you think your intelligence agencies can't rig an election or they wouldn't? Some seriously stupid gullible people here. And the reoccurring common theme: how. No major voting changes have been made to 2024 because no one can articulate how any mass fraud was carried out. It must kill you that you can’t vote for Trump. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 2 minutes ago, akvanden said: And the reoccurring common theme: how. No major voting changes have been made to 2024 because no one can articulate how any mass fraud was carried out. It must kill you that you can’t vote for Trump. Some seriously stupid gullible people here.^^^^^^^ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 From Georgia. Poor Fagden. Georgia: We have an electronic verification system, but we didn’t use it. We have records of voter signatures, but we didn’t use them. We could check our records for you, but it would take forever. Aside from that, judge, is there anything else you’d like? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 8 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: Some seriously stupid gullible people here.^^^^^^^ The most basic of questions stump you when it comes to the election. Q: How. A: Derrrrrr. Insult. Have you checked to see if they let foreigners be election judges here in the US? It would be beneficial for you. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Steve753 Posted March 4 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 4 16 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: Some seriously stupid gullible people here.^^^^^^^ No one is more gullible than you are. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 20 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: From Georgia. Poor Fagden. Georgia: We have an electronic verification system, but we didn’t use it. We have records of voter signatures, but we didn’t use them. We could check our records for you, but it would take forever. Aside from that, judge, is there anything else you’d like? Hey dumb dumb, they verify all signatures by hand. "Election officials have rejected 2,011 absentee ballots so far in this year’s general election because of mismatched or missing voter signatures, according to the secretary of state’s office. Voters returned a total of 1.32 million absentee ballots. The rate of absentee ballot rejections because of signature problems, 0.15%, is the same as in the 2018 election. Two years ago, there were 454 absentee rejections because of signature issues out of 284,000 absentee ballots cast. Election workers verify signatures on absentee ballot envelopes and absentee ballot applications by comparing them to the signatures that voters used when they registered. Those original signatures are stored in county election computers, either from when they signed up to vote at driver’s license offices or from paper registration forms." "Law enforcement and election investigators didn’t find a single fraudulent absentee ballot during an audit of over 15,000 voter signatures, according to a report by the Georgia secretary of state’s office released Tuesday. The audit contradicted allegations that absentee ballots were rife with fraud after President Donald Trump said the election had been stolen, said Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. Trump lost to Joe Biden by about 12,000 votes in Georgia." You know what's interesting? You rail against Dominion and other electronic forms of voting (in a country you don't even live in), yet apparently you want to introduce more electronics into the fold when it suits you. Although this time you just owned yourself. Again. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSFB Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 1 hour ago, akvanden said: Hey dumb dumb, they verify all signatures by hand. "Election officials have rejected 2,011 absentee ballots so far in this year’s general election because of mismatched or missing voter signatures, according to the secretary of state’s office. Voters returned a total of 1.32 million absentee ballots. The rate of absentee ballot rejections because of signature problems, 0.15%, is the same as in the 2018 election. Two years ago, there were 454 absentee rejections because of signature issues out of 284,000 absentee ballots cast. Election workers verify signatures on absentee ballot envelopes and absentee ballot applications by comparing them to the signatures that voters used when they registered. Those original signatures are stored in county election computers, either from when they signed up to vote at driver’s license offices or from paper registration forms." "Law enforcement and election investigators didn’t find a single fraudulent absentee ballot during an audit of over 15,000 voter signatures, according to a report by the Georgia secretary of state’s office released Tuesday. The audit contradicted allegations that absentee ballots were rife with fraud after President Donald Trump said the election had been stolen, said Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. Trump lost to Joe Biden by about 12,000 votes in Georgia." You know what's interesting? You rail against Dominion and other electronic forms of voting (in a country you don't even live in), yet apparently you want to introduce more electronics into the fold when it suits you. Although this time you just owned yourself. Again. Listen to the recent court case you gullible moron. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 To me if they can full on rig an election, why are they so desperate to get trump off the ballot? election interference bordering on treason, now that we know they do Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 3 hours ago, racer254 said: They are trying to make fraud easier, yet you only defend it to argue against someone on this board. Talk about misguided. I didn't defend shit, just pointed out that the rigged comment is laughable. 2 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said: Is it because you think your intelligence agencies can't rig an election or they wouldn't? Some seriously stupid gullible people here. So it's faith. You don't know how, have no possible answers, but still believe. Critical thinking 1 minute ago, Rod said: To me if they can full on rig an election, why are they so desperate to get trump off the ballot? Exactly, because they didn't rig the election. Lloyd, even Harry thinks you are an idiot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 On 3/3/2024 at 8:41 AM, Pete said: Yeah republicans always trying to change laws during a election. Yup always. Fuck off Exactly. It’s called Gerrymandering Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 15 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: Listen to the recent court case you gullible moron. I’ll just wait for your next dumbass comment. Here’s some more rope in the meantime. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 25 minutes ago, Rod said: To me if they can full on rig an election, why are they so desperate to get trump off the ballot? election interference bordering on treason, now that we know they do Will be much harder this time. How many days did it take? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 6 minutes ago, akvanden said: I’ll just wait for your next dumbass comment. Here’s some more rope in the meantime. Don't stop believing Fagden. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 14 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: Don't stop believing Fagden. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.