SVT MXZ XRS Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 9 minutes ago, ActionfigureJoe said: And you're the fucking idiot talking about putting bullets in people's heads. If anyone has shown to be a threat on this site it's you. A big mouth and little dick. Fuck off piece of shit 2 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: Mental health expert. Fucking weirdo is what he is. Guaranteed he sucks cock and takes it up the ass too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 Just now, SVT MXZ XRS said: Fuck off piece of shit Fucking weirdo is what he is. Guaranteed he sucks cock and takes it up the ass too Well he has two personalities on this site and goes back and forth between them. Not that there's anything wrong. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USA Contributing Member $poorsledder$ Posted February 4 USA Contributing Member Share Posted February 4 Chris Powell column Chris Powell has written about Connecticut government and politics for many years. He can be reached at cpowell@cox.net. Unless otherwise noted, all content here is Copyright 2024 (and earlier) by Chris Powell. Facebook Twitter Instagram Mutilation is mutilation, politically correct or not By Chris Powell What’s the difference between “female genital mutilation” and “gender-affirming care”? “Female genital mutilation” is an ancient barbaric practice prevailing in primitive cultures in Africa and the Middle East. Some adherents mistakenly think Islam requires it. It is committed against minor females and is euphemized as “purification.” “Gender-affirming care” is the euphemism for sex-change therapy and is a modern barbaric practice associated with politically correct cultures in North America and Western Europe. It is committed against minors of both sexes and involves anatomy-altering drugs and surgery. Female genital mutilation is prohibited by federal law and 41 states but not Connecticut, so last week state legislators, 30 civic groups, and victims of the practice announced that they again will try to have it outlawed in the forthcoming session of the General Assembly. Legislators are rushing to endorse the proposal, though following the dubious practice of states that outlaw abortion, the advocates of outlawing female genital mutilation in Connecticut also want the law to criminalize taking a minor out of state for mutilation. But meanwhile there is no effort in the legislature to prohibit “gender-affirming care” for minors, though Connecticut law presumes that minors lack the judgment to make such serious decisions, prohibiting them from purchasing alcohol, tobacco, and guns and from entering contracts and getting tattoos. Medical research increasingly connects bad physical and psychological outcomes with “gender-affirming care,” and many who received it as minors come to regret it. So in their consideration of female genital mutilation, legislators should ask why surgical and chemical mutilation and alteration shouldn’t be forbidden for all minors, delaying such practices to adulthood. What’s bad for the young goose is bad for the young gander as well, regardless of political correctness and however many other genders there are imagined to be. Chris Powell has written about Connecticut government and politics for many years. (CPowell@cox.net) -END- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mutilation is mutilation, politically correct or not By Chris Powell What’s the difference between “female genital mutilation” and “gender-affirming care”? “Female genital mutilation” is an ancient barbaric practice prevailing in primitive cultures in Africa and the Middle East. Some adherents mistakenly think Islam requires it. It is committed against minor females and is euphemized as “purification.” “Gender-affirming care” is the euphemism for sex-change therapy and is a modern barbaric practice associated with politically correct cultures in North America and Western Europe. It is committed against minors of both sexes and involves anatomy-altering drugs and surgery. Female genital mutilation is prohibited by federal law and 41 states but not Connecticut, so last week state legislators, 30 civic groups, and victims of the practice announced that they again will try to have it outlawed in the forthcoming session of the General Assembly. Legislators are rushing to endorse the proposal, though following the dubious practice of states that outlaw abortion, the advocates of outlawing female genital mutilation in Connecticut also want the law to criminalize taking a minor out of state for mutilation. But meanwhile there is no effort in the legislature to prohibit “gender-affirming care” for minors, though Connecticut law presumes that minors lack the judgment to make such serious decisions, prohibiting them from purchasing alcohol, tobacco, and guns and from entering contracts and getting tattoos. Medical research increasingly connects bad physical and psychological outcomes with “gender-affirming care,” and many who received it as minors come to regret it. So in their consideration of female genital mutilation, legislators should ask why surgical and chemical mutilation and alteration shouldn’t be forbidden for all minors, delaying such practices to adulthood. What’s bad for the young goose is bad for the young gander as well, regardless of political correctness and however many other genders there are imagined to be. Chris Powell has written about Connecticut government and politics for many years. (CPowell@cox.net) -END-
ActionfigureJoe Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 1 minute ago, SVT MXZ XRS said: Fuck off piece of shit Fucking weirdo is what he is. Guaranteed he sucks cock and takes it up the ass too Says the retarded liberal hunter. How many liberals have you shot so far, fucking moron. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 2 minutes ago, $poorsledder$ said: Chris Powell column Chris Powell has written about Connecticut government and politics for many years. He can be reached at cpowell@cox.net. Unless otherwise noted, all content here is Copyright 2024 (and earlier) by Chris Powell. Facebook Twitter Instagram Mutilation is mutilation, politically correct or not By Chris Powell What’s the difference between “female genital mutilation” and “gender-affirming care”? “Female genital mutilation” is an ancient barbaric practice prevailing in primitive cultures in Africa and the Middle East. Some adherents mistakenly think Islam requires it. It is committed against minor females and is euphemized as “purification.” “Gender-affirming care” is the euphemism for sex-change therapy and is a modern barbaric practice associated with politically correct cultures in North America and Western Europe. It is committed against minors of both sexes and involves anatomy-altering drugs and surgery. Female genital mutilation is prohibited by federal law and 41 states but not Connecticut, so last week state legislators, 30 civic groups, and victims of the practice announced that they again will try to have it outlawed in the forthcoming session of the General Assembly. Legislators are rushing to endorse the proposal, though following the dubious practice of states that outlaw abortion, the advocates of outlawing female genital mutilation in Connecticut also want the law to criminalize taking a minor out of state for mutilation. But meanwhile there is no effort in the legislature to prohibit “gender-affirming care” for minors, though Connecticut law presumes that minors lack the judgment to make such serious decisions, prohibiting them from purchasing alcohol, tobacco, and guns and from entering contracts and getting tattoos. Medical research increasingly connects bad physical and psychological outcomes with “gender-affirming care,” and many who received it as minors come to regret it. So in their consideration of female genital mutilation, legislators should ask why surgical and chemical mutilation and alteration shouldn’t be forbidden for all minors, delaying such practices to adulthood. What’s bad for the young goose is bad for the young gander as well, regardless of political correctness and however many other genders there are imagined to be. Chris Powell has written about Connecticut government and politics for many years. (CPowell@cox.net) -END- Posted bycxpowellFebruary 3, 2024Posted inUncategorizedTags:"fiscal guardrails", female genital mutilation, gender-affirming care, sex-change therapy, social-services industry Good read , the groomers are taking an absolute pounding in here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ckf Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 2 minutes ago, f7ben said: Thank you, Neal! Easily linking gif's is the best addition to the software in a long time. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 (edited) I'll post this again. Simple question, who do you side with? It's either the government AB or the marxist fascist unions and liberals. One puts you on the correct side, the other makes you a piece of shit. Another iqtest really. Edited February 4 by ArcticCrusher 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SVT MXZ XRS Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 14 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: Well he has two personalities on this site and goes back and forth between them. Not that there's anything wrong. He’s definitely fucked in the head. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 6 minutes ago, SVT MXZ XRS said: He’s definitely fucked in the head. Says the guy who says he's going to put bullets in people's heads. Go fuck yourself, fucking freak. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SVT MXZ XRS Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 3 minutes ago, ActionfigureJoe said: Says the guy who says he's going to put bullets in people's heads. Go fuck yourself, fucking freak. Link to where I said that? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 1 minute ago, SVT MXZ XRS said: Link to where I said that? Go hunt down your own posts, freak. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SVT MXZ XRS Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 2 minutes ago, ActionfigureJoe said:Go hunt down your own posts, freak. Got nothing. Exactly Fuck off now child molester 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 2 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said: Then speak up about it. The groomers behind these oddball conspiracy theories need to be shot. I could almost agree. Put in their place sure, but shot is pretty extreme. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 2 hours ago, $poorsledder$ said: Chris Powell column Chris Powell has written about Connecticut government and politics for many years. He can be reached at cpowell@cox.net. Unless otherwise noted, all content here is Copyright 2024 (and earlier) by Chris Powell. Facebook Twitter Instagram Mutilation is mutilation, politically correct or not By Chris Powell What’s the difference between “female genital mutilation” and “gender-affirming care”? “Female genital mutilation” is an ancient barbaric practice prevailing in primitive cultures in Africa and the Middle East. Some adherents mistakenly think Islam requires it. It is committed against minor females and is euphemized as “purification.” “Gender-affirming care” is the euphemism for sex-change therapy and is a modern barbaric practice associated with politically correct cultures in North America and Western Europe. It is committed against minors of both sexes and involves anatomy-altering drugs and surgery. Female genital mutilation is prohibited by federal law and 41 states but not Connecticut, so last week state legislators, 30 civic groups, and victims of the practice announced that they again will try to have it outlawed in the forthcoming session of the General Assembly. Legislators are rushing to endorse the proposal, though following the dubious practice of states that outlaw abortion, the advocates of outlawing female genital mutilation in Connecticut also want the law to criminalize taking a minor out of state for mutilation. But meanwhile there is no effort in the legislature to prohibit “gender-affirming care” for minors, though Connecticut law presumes that minors lack the judgment to make such serious decisions, prohibiting them from purchasing alcohol, tobacco, and guns and from entering contracts and getting tattoos. Medical research increasingly connects bad physical and psychological outcomes with “gender-affirming care,” and many who received it as minors come to regret it. So in their consideration of female genital mutilation, legislators should ask why surgical and chemical mutilation and alteration shouldn’t be forbidden for all minors, delaying such practices to adulthood. What’s bad for the young goose is bad for the young gander as well, regardless of political correctness and however many other genders there are imagined to be. Chris Powell has written about Connecticut government and politics for many years. (CPowell@cox.net) -END- So circumcision would qualify as genital mutilation as well right? Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mutilation is mutilation, politically correct or not By Chris Powell What’s the difference between “female genital mutilation” and “gender-affirming care”? “Female genital mutilation” is an ancient barbaric practice prevailing in primitive cultures in Africa and the Middle East. Some adherents mistakenly think Islam requires it. It is committed against minor females and is euphemized as “purification.” “Gender-affirming care” is the euphemism for sex-change therapy and is a modern barbaric practice associated with politically correct cultures in North America and Western Europe. It is committed against minors of both sexes and involves anatomy-altering drugs and surgery. Female genital mutilation is prohibited by federal law and 41 states but not Connecticut, so last week state legislators, 30 civic groups, and victims of the practice announced that they again will try to have it outlawed in the forthcoming session of the General Assembly. Legislators are rushing to endorse the proposal, though following the dubious practice of states that outlaw abortion, the advocates of outlawing female genital mutilation in Connecticut also want the law to criminalize taking a minor out of state for mutilation. But meanwhile there is no effort in the legislature to prohibit “gender-affirming care” for minors, though Connecticut law presumes that minors lack the judgment to make such serious decisions, prohibiting them from purchasing alcohol, tobacco, and guns and from entering contracts and getting tattoos. Medical research increasingly connects bad physical and psychological outcomes with “gender-affirming care,” and many who received it as minors come to regret it. So in their consideration of female genital mutilation, legislators should ask why surgical and chemical mutilation and alteration shouldn’t be forbidden for all minors, delaying such practices to adulthood. What’s bad for the young goose is bad for the young gander as well, regardless of political correctness and however many other genders there are imagined to be. Chris Powell has written about Connecticut government and politics for many years. (CPowell@cox.net) -END-
ArcticCrusher Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 23 minutes ago, Deephaven said: I could almost agree. Put in their place sure, but shot is pretty extreme. I see you failed yet another iqtest. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 Another one you can't explain? Try. Or look like the idiot you are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 19 hours ago, Deephaven said: Another one you can't explain? Try. Or look like the idiot you are. Again for the brainwashed retarded simpleton who still don't see where the narrative is coming from. Its no coincidence moron. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 So that was you not being able to explain it. Nobody with a brain reads your links... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 1 hour ago, Deephaven said: So that was you not being able to explain it. Nobody with a brain reads your links... You wouldn't need a link if you had a brain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 19 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: You wouldn't need a link if you had a brain. Exactly. You are the one that needs them. If you had any capability of thought you could just state your point instead of a link. Your links are so stupid no one looks at them. Try and use your pea brain once and actually make a point! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.