Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

The New York Times


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Skidooski said:

So the Dems are winning the recent special elections? Running on anti-Trump platforms and not much else?

no, they still lost, but by small margins in red areas, areas the repukes should have won hugely. think much dude?

Edited by Snoslinger
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

yes, "upset" is a better term for what happened.

Yes, "upset".  Like a heavily favored NFL team being beat by their opponent 31-20.  Except their opponent was an inexperienced middle school squash team from Honduras who had never played the game before.

"Upset".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
3 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

no, they still lost, but by small margins in red areas, areas they should have won hugely. think much dude?

Are you guys going to spend the next fours years looking for "that turning point" where your party comes back around? At this rate, with the Dem party continuing on like this, Trump can be marginal at best and get re-elected 

Edited by Skidooski
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

Yes, "upset".  Like a heavily favored NFL team being beat by their opponent 31-20.  Except their opponent was an inexperienced middle school squash team from Honduras who had never played the game before.

"Upset".

only it wasn't 31-20. more like 31-30.9 ya dingaling

:lol:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

only it wasn't 31-20. more like 31-30.9 ya dingaling

:lol:

 

No...EC was 306 to 232.  I was trying to convey close football scores.  But maybe a 31-23 may have helped you there.  Just because your news sources stopped the count, didn't mean it stopped.

Oh...yes...we all know you took California "Bigly". :lmao:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SmeeAgain said:

More like 304 to 227...  :lol:

ok, that was pretty good.

but you need to take a look at those individual state wins, they were not by large margins, especially the battlegrounds.

 

 

Edited by Snoslinger
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

ok, that was pretty good.

but you need to take a look at those individual state wins, they were not by large margins, especially the battlegrounds.

 

 

" Dump has no chance"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
11 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

ok, that was pretty good.

but you need to take a look at those individual state wins, they were not by large margins, especially the battlegrounds.

 

 

A win is a win dude! All your excuses are shit cause She Lost!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

ok, that was pretty good.

but you need to take a look at those individual state wins, they were not by large margins, especially the battlegrounds.

 

 

No one ever wins by a large margin in those states - except Reagan over Carter most likely.  That is the very reason why the founding fathers were so damn smart.  They knew not to let a populous area of like-thinking people control the country and that is why we have the electoral college.  :bc:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
21 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

ok, that was pretty good.

but you need to take a look at those individual state wins, they were not by large margins, especially the battlegrounds.

 

 

Thats like looking at individual plays in a game.   Well he almost got tackled. :lol:  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Snoslinger said:

1. the NY times article, at the link, only has the recent picture

2. the irony of snake, dependsbuster, and other rwws pointing out pettiness, after reading their nonsense for 8 years, is comical

3. trump does not have the same support and admiration as Obama did, and never will. trump is a divisive, pompous a-hole and these are the results from it. the trumpsters need to deal with it.

 

 

2 hours ago, Snoslinger said:

I just noticed a correction on the bottom of the page a the link. the pic was removed and explained. yeah, that was pretty bad.

You could have just said   :owned:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
4 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

nobody is denying the win ya dumb shit :lol:

 

 

MC kind of does. :lol:  

What I found the most interesting thing that came out of the new book on her campaign is that she wasn't even listening to Bill.   Without question one of the smartest, shrewdest politicians when it comes to campaigning and getting in touch with the voters that we've ever had and she ignored him.  That's fucking nuts.  Her ego cost her the election more than anything.  

Edited by Highmark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...