Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Zelensky Says US Sons and Daughters Will Have To Fight and Die


Recommended Posts

  • Platinum Contributing Member
1 minute ago, SnowRider said:

@Skidooski hope you’ve had time this week to knit friendship bracelets :lol: Teeetiebird, Canadian Hardy Boys, and a couple others are expecting one :lmao: 

That one really chapped your ass eh. Is that why you keep trying to use it over ad over now  LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
1 minute ago, Mainecat said:

Why not post the entire video? He was referring to a what if Ukraine loses the fight and Russia continues across.

Jesus the members here are fuckin stupid.

Because it doesn’t fit their pro-Putin agenda. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
Just now, Skidooski said:

That one really chapped your ass eh. Is that why you keep trying to use it over ad over now  LOL

:lol: over and over is like twice :lol: It’s a great example of your lack of self-awareness.  Just like @Jimmy Snacks bullshit on projection or anyone on here yapping about ‘think for yourself’.  There’s no way I can keep up with all the hypocrisy and self own age on here.  It’s damn near every post :lol: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
3 minutes ago, Skidooski said:

If you dont agree with a few war mongering boomer idiots you are Pro-Putin

:suicide:

War-mongering is not accurate and another example of your intellectual dishonesty.  Coddling Putin like you’re doing is more like war mongering as he’s the one who invaded a sovereign nation.  Supporting those defending their country is not war mongering :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Gold Member
On 9/8/2016 at 6:25 AM, SnowRider said:

:snack:Just another R planning to massively increase the debt. :lol: 

Ahead of the forum, Trump rolled out a new plan to boost military spending by tens of billions of dollars, including major increases in the number of active troops, fighter planes, ships and submarines.

His address earlier in the day also included plans to eliminate deep spending cuts known as the "sequester" that were enacted when Congress failed to reach a budget compromise in 2011. Republicans and Democrats voted for the automatic, across-the board cuts that affected both military and domestic programs, though the White House has long pressed Congress to lift the spending limits.

Trump expressed support for the sequester in interviews in 2013 — even describing them as too small — but seemed to suggest at the time that military spending should be exempt.

A senior adviser said ahead of the speech that Trump would make sure the additional spending was fully paid for but did not explain how.

The United States currently spends more than $600 billion a year on the military, more than the next seven countries combined.

image.jpeg

 

On 8/15/2016 at 8:00 AM, SnowRider said:

There appears to be corruption between The Dump campaign and Ukraine.  Coupled with the hacking from Russia of democratic officials personal information, Dumps NATO comments, and Rumps love affair with Putin there appears to be a dangerous connection between Dump and Russia.....:snack:

 

Mook's response came in after the Times report about the discovery by anti-corruption investigators of "$12.7 million in undisclosed cash payments designated for Mr. Manafort from [then-President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovich's] pro-Russian political party from 2007 to 2012, according to Ukraine's newly formed National Anti-Corruption Bureau." 

According to the report, anti-corruption officials and investigators in Ukraine argue that the payments they discovered are part of a large, secret network of corruption operated by the government under Yanukovich, for whom Manafort worked as a consultant at the time. 

The report also noted that those officials have not yet determined if Manafort received the payments found in the handwritten ledgers. Manafort's lawyer, Richard Hibey, denied to the Times that his client received "any such cash payments" described in the report

Prior to serving as chairman of the Trump campaign, Manafort previously worked on and off as a political consultant for Yanukovich, before Yanukovich's violent ouster in 2014. 

Manafort's work there has come under scrutiny and drawn flak for the Trump campaign, particularly as the standoff between Ukraine and Russia devolved into violence following Yanukovich's flight to Russia, and as the Yanukovich government's pro-Russian ties and corruption have been made public in reports such as that in the Times. That scrutiny has increased in response to the suspicion surrounding Russia's role in the hack of the Democratic National Committee and the Trump campaign's rhetoric about withdrawing support for Eastern European NATO allies in the face of Russian aggression. 

http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/15/politics/clinton-slams-trump-over-manafort-report/index.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

image.jpeg

 

On 8/2/2016 at 6:37 AM, SnowRider said:

:news:  More good news for the country....

And just as foreign policy has come to the forefront of the campaign, Clinton has widened her edge over Trump as more trusted to handle foreign policy (59% Clinton to 36% Trump, up from a 5-point split following the GOP convention) and has pulled even with Trump on handling terrorism (48% each -- Trump was +11 after the GOP convention) and ISIS (48% Clinton to 47% Trump -- was a 13-point Trump lead after the GOP convention).

Clinton also has an advantage now on most domestic issues, yet her edge on what has consistently held as voters' top issue -- the economy -- is too small to be statistically significant: 50% trust her, 48% Trump. 

Clinton holds her widest lead over Trump on handling race relations, 61% trust her vs. 34% who trust Trump. 

She also has a double-digit edge on health care (+15), nominating justices to the Supreme Court (+14), immigration (+12) and trade with other countries (+10). 

Clinton tops Trump by single-digits on handling the criminal justice system (50% Clinton to 43% Trump) and violence against police officers (Clinton 49% to Trump 44%). Trump has a narrow 2-point edge on handling gun policy.

This poll marks the first time in CNN/ORC polling this election cycle that Democrats are more likely than Republicans to say they're enthusiastic about voting in the fall. About half of Democrats and Democratic-leaning voters (51%) say they are extremely or very enthusiastic about voting for president, compared with 41% among Republican and Republican-leaning voters.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/02/politics/presidential-polls-trump-vs-clinton/index.html?adkey=bn

 

image.jpeg

 

 

 

Ah how times have changed :lol:

Poor Snowdickrider. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
2 minutes ago, EvilBird said:

Not fucking once. Yet we are his "supporters"

Mind numbing stupidity from these clowns 

They are just doing what they are told to! It's the only way they know how to live

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
55 minutes ago, ViperGTS/Z1 said:

No you don't.... Your original post was cut and edited to make it look like Zelensky wanted our troops now.   Totally bogus.

I don’t care how it was edited and yes I understood what exactly what he was saying.

Edited by Jimmy Snacks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Gold Member

Does anybody remember when Toolkit's biggest fear was more Military spending? 

I mean post after post of fear of Trump spending money on the Military . Yet here we are now and he wants to spend as much as it takes to "stop Putin" in a "sovereign country" . 

What a fucking hack. :owned:

On 9/28/2016 at 7:59 AM, SnowRider said:

 

I find it interesting that many R's believe they have a cavalier attitude towards government and fear it's overreach and intrusion - yet they lick the boots of cops and  the military and want government in our bedrooms.  

 

On 9/23/2016 at 9:43 AM, SnowRider said:

Please weigh in. No increase revenue and rememebr Dump wants a stronger military so there will need to be an increase in military spending.  Let's see your results:

 

http://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=AwrBT9w6MOVXjXgAWfHBGOd_;_ylu=X3oDMTE0bHRjcmE1BGNvbG8DYmYxBHBvcwMxBHZ0aWQDVUkwMVRDMV8xBHNlYwNzcg--/RV=2/RE=1474666682/RO=10/RU=http%3a%2f%2fcrfb.org%2fstabilizethedebt%2f/RK=0/RS=2NRLUJ_7L7gP.Fa4WaIodcjjn.c-

 

On 9/23/2016 at 1:28 PM, SnowRider said:

You have difficulty comprehending big numbers....eliminate the IRS and tell what percentage of the military budget that equates too. :lol: 

 

Hint:. If quit freeloading and paid cfk you'd have a much larger impact than eliminating the IRS :😖

 

On 9/23/2016 at 10:02 AM, SnowRider said:

The link is posted.  Have at it and let's see what happens.  Remember - military spending needs to increase while revenues need to decrease if you're a Rump Pumper :bc: 

 

On 9/23/2016 at 9:00 AM, SnowRider said:

How does that translate into support for Dumps plan? :snack:

And if enough is enough - balance the budget and show your cuts and revenues :bc: Remember - you're also supporting more military spending.  

 

:lol: 

 

On 9/21/2016 at 5:03 PM, SnowRider said:

And therein lies your problem IMO.  How has the formula of lower taxes, strong military (code for increased spending) worked out for us?  :news:

 

On 9/21/2016 at 12:11 PM, SnowRider said:

Does a larger military increase or decrease the size and cost of government?  And what's Dump's position on Military spending along with a funding source?    

 

On 5/30/2017 at 1:31 PM, SnowRider said:

Why do you support a party and president who's requesting $50 billion + more in military spending? :snack:

Ooofff. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
3 minutes ago, EvilBird said:

Does anybody remember when Toolkit's biggest fear was more Military spending? 

I mean post after post of fear of Trump spending money on the Military . Yet here we are now and he wants to spend as much as it takes to "stop Putin" in a "sovereign country" . 

What a fucking hack. :owned:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ooofff. 

Dang that's some huge self ownage there.

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
18 minutes ago, Mainecat said:

No you didn’t or you wouldn't have posted it.

 

Zelensky is using the threat of Putin invading NATO Countries to squeeze more out of the The United States as I already stated…if you can’t see that go lay down.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We could of avoided this whole thing with the right people in charge!

we sat back and waited for this invasion and then decided to throw money at it!!

we knew what Putin was up to and should of had some serious discussions with him!!

but nope we just watched hoping all this would happen!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, EvilBird said:

Does anybody remember when Toolkit's biggest fear was more Military spending? 

I mean post after post of fear of Trump spending money on the Military . Yet here we are now and he wants to spend as much as it takes to "stop Putin" in a "sovereign country" . 

What a fucking hack. :owned:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ooofff. 

I sense another sudden absence soon.:lol:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, EvilBird said:

 

 

 

 

 

Ah how times have changed :lol:

Poor Snowdickrider. 

 

54 minutes ago, EvilBird said:

Does anybody remember when Toolkit's biggest fear was more Military spending? 

I mean post after post of fear of Trump spending money on the Military . Yet here we are now and he wants to spend as much as it takes to "stop Putin" in a "sovereign country" . 

What a fucking hack. :owned:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ooofff. 

beat-down.gif

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...