akvanden Posted December 15, 2022 Share Posted December 15, 2022 5 hours ago, Roosting said: Well according to your previous comments here the concept is/was way over your head. Now you are sad and apparently still confused I think I get the concept, but it's the details that matter. When/if this ever goes to court, when the govt says we 'recommended' and didn't force Twitter to do anything, and there's no record of them forcing Twitter to do anything, then it becomes nothing. No sadness, no confusion. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted December 15, 2022 Share Posted December 15, 2022 49 minutes ago, akvanden said: I think I get the concept, but it's the details that matter. When/if this ever goes to court, when the govt says we 'recommended' and didn't force Twitter to do anything, and there's no record of them forcing Twitter to do anything, then it becomes nothing. No sadness, no confusion. "Nice company you got there sonny, be a shame to see anything happen to it." 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted December 15, 2022 Share Posted December 15, 2022 1 hour ago, akvanden said: I think I get the concept, but it's the details that matter. When/if this ever goes to court, when the govt says we 'recommended' and didn't force Twitter to do anything, and there's no record of them forcing Twitter to do anything, then it becomes nothing. No sadness, no confusion. You Neolibs love fascism so much 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roosting Posted December 15, 2022 Share Posted December 15, 2022 57 minutes ago, akvanden said: I think I get the concept, but it's the details that matter. When/if this ever goes to court, when the govt says we 'recommended' and didn't force Twitter to do anything, and there's no record of them forcing Twitter to do anything, then it becomes nothing. No sadness, no confusion. you didnt understand what was revealed. Got learned on the subject And still dont quite understand what happened or what was revealed. Force is not required but direction is not allowed. Pretty easy concept and clearly articulated on some piece of paper some consider to be important. Dont eat the crayons. What flavor is your favorite color? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted December 15, 2022 Share Posted December 15, 2022 Just now, Roosting said: you didnt understand what was revealed. Got learned on the subject And still dont quite understand what happened or what was revealed. Force is not required but direction is not allowed. Pretty easy concept and clearly articulated on some piece of paper some consider to be important. Dont eat the crayons. What flavor is your favorite color? You've got the best replies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted December 15, 2022 Share Posted December 15, 2022 1 minute ago, Roosting said: you didnt understand what was revealed. Got learned on the subject And still dont quite understand what happened or what was revealed. Force is not required but direction is not allowed. Pretty easy concept and clearly articulated on some piece of paper some consider to be important. Dont eat the crayons. What flavor is your favorite color? This was the Neolibs attempt at circumvent the 1a and they're applauding it. Because you know, they can't be fascists because Wikipedia says so Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roosting Posted December 15, 2022 Share Posted December 15, 2022 2 minutes ago, akvanden said: You've got the best replies. Translation: DEEERRRRRRPPPPPP 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Steve753 Posted December 15, 2022 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 15, 2022 6 minutes ago, akvanden said: You've got the best replies. You got learned. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted December 15, 2022 Share Posted December 15, 2022 (edited) 14 minutes ago, Roosting said: Translation: DEEERRRRRRPPPPPP Yes, you learned me. 11 minutes ago, Steve753 said: You got learned. The Canadians are always concerned and learning us about our constitution. Same thing with politics. This is such a slam dunk case that the govt officials in question are just going straight to jail. Edited December 15, 2022 by akvanden Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Steve753 Posted December 15, 2022 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 15, 2022 3 minutes ago, akvanden said: Yes, you learned me. The Canadians are always concerned and learning us about our constitution. Same thing with politics. This is such a slam dunk case that the govt officials in question are just going straight to jail. On to the next thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roosting Posted December 15, 2022 Share Posted December 15, 2022 55 minutes ago, akvanden said: Yes, you learned me. The Canadians are always concerned and learning us about our constitution. Same thing with politics. This is such a slam dunk case that the govt officials in question are just going straight to jail. Nobody said anyone from the gov is going to jail. We all know that will never happen, but this did happen. Just like hillary broke the law but nobody is above the law right? right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted December 15, 2022 Share Posted December 15, 2022 4 minutes ago, Roosting said: Nobody said anyone from the gov is going to jail. We all know that will never happen, but this did happen. Just like hillary broke the law but nobody is above the law right? right? Somebody should be able to prove it in a court of law and be compensated for the govts suppression of their freedom of speech. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roosting Posted December 15, 2022 Share Posted December 15, 2022 (edited) 4 minutes ago, akvanden said: Somebody should be able to prove it in a court of law and be compensated for the govts suppression of their freedom of speech. ya well you go with that. Hill was a slam dunk too. Elon gave you the evidence it tells the story Edited December 15, 2022 by Roosting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted December 15, 2022 Share Posted December 15, 2022 55 minutes ago, Roosting said: ya well you go with that. It's what I've said from the beginning: "good luck." We may not like it, and we can debate that all day long, but unless you can prove the illegality in a court of law (which I assume those who feel their first amendment right were harmed will), then that's all it is, us debating the interpretation of the first amendment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted December 15, 2022 Share Posted December 15, 2022 42 minutes ago, akvanden said: It's what I've said from the beginning: "good luck." We may not like it, and we can debate that all day long, but unless you can prove the illegality in a court of law (which I assume those who feel their first amendment right were harmed will), then that's all it is, us debating the interpretation of the first amendment. But you hate the constitution... it gets in the way of your government daddy that you desire so much 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted December 16, 2022 Share Posted December 16, 2022 1 hour ago, akvanden said: It's what I've said from the beginning: "good luck." We may not like it, and we can debate that all day long, but unless you can prove the illegality in a court of law (which I assume those who feel their first amendment right were harmed will), then that's all it is, us debating the interpretation of the first amendment. Who is pushing that? That's the problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted December 16, 2022 Share Posted December 16, 2022 1 minute ago, ArcticCrusher said:Who is pushing that? That's the problem. Fagden desires to have a daddy so bad it's weird. But that's common on the left Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted December 16, 2022 Share Posted December 16, 2022 14 minutes ago, ACE said: Fagden desires to have a daddy so bad it's weird. But that's common on the left Maybe he thinks this is fake. The guy is a certified brain dead retard. One hair above Snowpussy but not by much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted December 16, 2022 Share Posted December 16, 2022 How about this confession? One more item not breaking on fake news. None of this is new, unless you're a fucking idiot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DriftBusta Posted December 16, 2022 Share Posted December 16, 2022 7 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: How about this confession? One more item not breaking on fake news. None of this is new, unless you're a fucking idiot. yeah but you never back up your opinions! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Steve753 Posted December 16, 2022 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 16, 2022 2 minutes ago, DriftBusta said: yeah but you never back up your opinions! Those aren't his opinions. He doesn't have original thought in his head. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted December 16, 2022 Share Posted December 16, 2022 3 minutes ago, Steve753 said: Those aren't his opinions. He doesn't have original thought in his head. Those are facts to back them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DriftBusta Posted December 16, 2022 Share Posted December 16, 2022 2 minutes ago, Steve753 said: Those aren't his opinions. He doesn't have original thought in his head. So no comment on the links he posted, not very intellectually honest, just saying. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted December 16, 2022 Share Posted December 16, 2022 Ok regardless of your pronouns this is funny. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Steve753 Posted December 16, 2022 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 16, 2022 8 minutes ago, DriftBusta said: So no comment on the links he posted, not very intellectually honest, just saying. I'm tired of looking into them and finding holes. It's gets old. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.