ckf Posted November 9, 2021 Share Posted November 9, 2021 12 hours ago, SkisNH said: While I agree that he shouldn't have lied...the media wouldn't have taken its none of your business as an answer. He would have been forced to go through the media circus and ridiculousness that Kylie Irving had to endure. You can try to justify lying however you want, but it is still a lie. If it didn't have anything to do with the virus you might see things differently, but.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkisNH Posted November 9, 2021 Share Posted November 9, 2021 12 minutes ago, ckf said: You can try to justify lying however you want, but it is still a lie. If it didn't have anything to do with the virus you might see things differently, but.... Meh...I might have done the same. He already had covid, there really is no need to get the shot 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted November 9, 2021 Share Posted November 9, 2021 The man should not be required to take a fucking shot. Period. Lie if he wants, it is completely immaterial. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ckf Posted November 9, 2021 Share Posted November 9, 2021 7 minutes ago, Snake said: The man should not be required to take a fucking shot. Period. Lie if he wants, it is completely immaterial. Agreed on the 1st part. No it isn't immaterial. Rodgers has to play by the same rules as every other NFL player. If he didn't want to play by the rules agreed to by his union he should have sat out the season. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roosting Posted November 9, 2021 Share Posted November 9, 2021 3 hours ago, ckf said: You can try to justify lying however you want, but it is still a lie. If it didn't have anything to do with the virus you might see things differently, but.... I see your point if he never took an alternative therapy but he did. So he never lied about that. It was it easy for the interviewer/viewer to misinterpret his statement as taking the gov approved version but that was assumed. So the fact you got snookered doesn't make it a lie. Semantics it all comes down to how you interpreted it. Was it misdirection yes. An outright lie questionable. Is it an issue at all no. Does it help generate more media buzz for the vax yes (as it was intended to do ) Only problem he has no symptoms so it appears his immunization was effective just like the gov vax Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ckf Posted November 9, 2021 Share Posted November 9, 2021 2 minutes ago, Roosting said: I see your point if he never took an alternative therapy but he did. So he never lied about that. It was it easy for the interviewer/viewer to misinterpret his statement as taking the gov approved version but that was assumed. So the fact you got snookered doesn't make it a lie. Semantics it all comes down to how you interpreted it. Was it misdirection yes. An outright lie questionable. Is it an issue at all no. Does it help generate more media buzz for the vax yes (as it was intended to do ) Only problem he has no symptoms so it appears his immunization was effective just like the gov vax But that was a therapy that the NFL rejected. Then he continued the lie by playing by the same rules as vaccinated players. Like it or not, this guy is a role model for a lot of kids. Lying and or misleading, whatever you want to call it doesn't set a good example for today's youth IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
airflite1 Posted November 9, 2021 Share Posted November 9, 2021 15 minutes ago, ckf said: But that was a therapy that the NFL rejected. Then he continued the lie by playing by the same rules as vaccinated players. Like it or not, this guy is a role model for a lot of kids. Lying and or misleading, whatever you want to call it doesn't set a good example for today's youth IMO. I haven't followed this closely, but what I've read he followed the exact protocol of the unvaccinated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ckf Posted November 9, 2021 Share Posted November 9, 2021 4 minutes ago, airflite1 said: I haven't followed this closely, but what I've read he followed the exact protocol of the unvaccinated. Not all the time from what I have read/watched. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted November 9, 2021 Share Posted November 9, 2021 Sometimes you gotta call the bullshit out and just say fuck off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member EvilBird Posted November 9, 2021 Gold Member Share Posted November 9, 2021 Fucking unbelievable... Good to know court orders mean nothing to this regime and dictator. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted November 9, 2021 Share Posted November 9, 2021 Just now, EvilBird said: Fucking unbelievable... Good to know court orders mean nothing to this regime and dictator. Exactly the point I made above.... When the top lies to you, it's free reign on distrust at that point. Lie, cheat or steal if necessary. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member EvilBird Posted November 9, 2021 Gold Member Share Posted November 9, 2021 1 minute ago, Snake said: Exactly the point I made above.... When the top lies to you, it's free reign on distrust at that point. Lie, cheat or steal if necessary. Totally agree , I basically said same thing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted November 9, 2021 Share Posted November 9, 2021 4 minutes ago, EvilBird said: Fucking unbelievable... Good to know court orders mean nothing to this regime and dictator. And the msm is on the side of tyrants. Who could have guessed. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roosting Posted November 9, 2021 Share Posted November 9, 2021 2 hours ago, ckf said: But that was a therapy that the NFL rejected. Then he continued the lie by playing by the same rules as vaccinated players. Like it or not, this guy is a role model for a lot of kids. Lying and or misleading, whatever you want to call it doesn't set a good example for today's youth IMO. Yep a role model that didnt bend to unconstitutional mandates. He done good on that. NFL is bound to accept only the gov approved method period. Your point would hold more value if multiple people in various sports who are fully vax with the gov approved version didnt get tested positive and have to sit out. If Rodgers was the only positive case it would hold the argument better. Bold: how is his outcome any different than a fully vax person? He probably got it from a fully vax player Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkisNH Posted November 9, 2021 Share Posted November 9, 2021 2 hours ago, ckf said: You can try to justify lying however you want, but it is still a lie. If it didn't have anything to do with the virus you might see things differently, but.... "If you like your doctor you can keep your doctor" "The southern boarder is closed" "If you take the vaccine you won't get sick" "The infrastructure bill won't add one dime to the debt" Aaron's indiscretion was miniscule in comparison. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ckf Posted November 9, 2021 Share Posted November 9, 2021 Again, you guys are proving my point about making it political. Rules are rules, as an employee you can't pick and choose what rules that we are going to follow and lie about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ckf Posted November 9, 2021 Share Posted November 9, 2021 1 minute ago, SkisNH said: "If you like your doctor you can keep your doctor" "The southern boarder is closed" "If you take the vaccine you won't get sick" "The infrastructure bill won't add one dime to the debt" Aaron's indiscretion was miniscule in comparison. Again, trying to justify. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkisNH Posted November 9, 2021 Share Posted November 9, 2021 2 minutes ago, ckf said: Again, trying to justify. Not just I just think your anger is misplaced. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted November 9, 2021 Share Posted November 9, 2021 6 minutes ago, ckf said: Again, you guys are proving my point about making it political. Rules are rules, as an employee you can't pick and choose what rules that we are going to follow and lie about it. Rules? You are trying to justify mandating an experiment. I don't think so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ckf Posted November 9, 2021 Share Posted November 9, 2021 2 minutes ago, SkisNH said: Not just I just think your anger is misplaced. LOL, my anger. I'm just pointing out the facts without politics getting in the way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ckf Posted November 9, 2021 Share Posted November 9, 2021 Just now, ArcticCrusher said: Rules? You are trying to justify mandating an experiment. I don't think so. I'm not the one that agreed to the terms. Give me a break Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted November 9, 2021 Share Posted November 9, 2021 6 minutes ago, ckf said: I'm not the one that agreed to the terms. Give me a break Mandating an experiment on another individual while thinking you have zero liability. OK. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ckf Posted November 9, 2021 Share Posted November 9, 2021 1 minute ago, ArcticCrusher said: Mandating an experiment on another individual while thinking you have zero liability. OK. You are making assumptions that you know nothing about. This isn't about whether I agree with the rules or not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkisNH Posted November 9, 2021 Share Posted November 9, 2021 23 minutes ago, ckf said: LOL, my anger. I'm just pointing out the facts without politics getting in the way. This is 100% political...can't you see that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted November 9, 2021 Share Posted November 9, 2021 17 minutes ago, ckf said: You are making assumptions that you know nothing about. This isn't about whether I agree with the rules or not. How is that an assumption and how can anyone support it? These aren't rules, they are coercion. Time to move on from the tyranny. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.