Owned 

 

https://thepostmillennial.com/rittenhouse-reasonable-decision-testimony?utm_campaign=64492&fbclid=IwAR1S7PNEhrWbevKL1TQsa0gcUwfuYscaBXKQPI5oT3A2cHPiId_0J5FDn6o

The state should file to have the judge removed,

 

Kyle looks like he might be autistic, or maybe has Tourette's Syndrome.

Asperger's or Tourette's.   

 Me personally, I think the kid is a wannabe fuckhead.    

4 minutes ago, Polaris 550 said:

Kyle looks like he might be autistic, or maybe has Tourette's Syndrome.

Asperger's or Tourette's.   

 Me personally, I think the kid is a wannabe fuckhead.    

lol, you really hate it when the good guys win 

  🔍 🍎 🔎 

And a Pixel argument ensues? 

 

20 minutes ago, Polaris 550 said:

I think I'm the only one here that thinks the prosecutor is doing a good job. 

Don't know what the verdict will be, but the prosecutor is good. 

 

He’s doing the best he can with a case that should have never made it to court.  

17 minutes ago, Polaris 550 said:

The state should file to have the judge removed,

 

But I thought you said the prosecutor was doing a good job?

8 minutes ago, toslow said:

lol, you really hate it when the good guys win 

I don't give a shit, either way.

I think Ritten is a police wannabe, and was looking for a fight/shoot-out.

They all were bad that night, but Kyle is a mental case that killed two people, and shot a guy's fukkin arm off. 

I think he has to pay........something. Maybe not murder, but something. 

1 minute ago, Zambroski said:

He’s doing the best he can with a case that should have never made it to court.  

But I thought you said the prosecutor was doing a good job?

Yeah, prosecutor is good, but the judge is prejudicial. 

I'm the only one here against Rittenhouse. Wow.    

Just now, Polaris 550 said:

Yeah, prosecutor is good, but the judge is prejudicial. 

Seems he know what most of us do.  This is a waste of taxpayers time and clearly political.  He has a right to be irritated with the usurping of the law.

10 minutes ago, Polaris 550 said:

Yeah, prosecutor is good, but the judge is prejudicial. 

Why would you think that?  He is the longest serving current judge in Wisconsin, appointed in 1983 by Tony Earl.

Anyone surprised?

 

 

19 minutes ago, racer254 said:

Why would you think that?  He is the longest serving current judge in Wisconsin, appointed in 1983 by Tony Earl.

Like I said, he's too old and demented. 

I bet he's either shitting or pissing in his DEPENDS up there.  

1 minute ago, Polaris 550 said:

Like I said, he's too old and demented. 

I bet he's either shitting or pissing in his DEPENDS up there.  

Every time I've tuned in he's very laid back, well except when unapproved evidence is attempted to being weaseled in. I agree the prosecution is pushing for a mistrial so they can try remove the testimony that he told his witnesses to change their story and so he can coach his main witness better, Grosskreutz's testimony really hurt their case.

1 minute ago, airflite1 said:

Every time I've tuned in he's very laid back, well except when unapproved evidence is attempted to being weaseled in. I agree the prosecution is pushing for a mistrial so they can try remove the testimony that he told his witnesses to change their story and so he can coach his main witness better, Grosskreutz's testimony really hurt their case.

I didn't see Gross's testimony, but I hear it was bad.

The whole case is kind of fucked. 

I do believe the judge is against the prosecutor.

I also believe Ritten should get something........not murder, but something.  

1 minute ago, Polaris 550 said:

I didn't see Gross's testimony, but I hear it was bad.

The whole case is kind of fucked. 

I do believe the judge is against the prosecutor.

I also believe Ritten should get something........not murder, but something.  

Only because the prosecution has been trying to twist his words and rulings, and bring evidence that is unrelated to the charges just to paint a picture making Kyle look bad, "he wore a t-shirt I didn't like 4 months after the riot".

4 minutes ago, airflite1 said:

Only because the prosecution has been trying to twist his words and rulings, and bring evidence that is unrelated to the charges just to paint a picture making Kyle look bad, "he wore a t-shirt I didn't like 4 months after the riot".

Do you think Kyle is not responsible for anything here? 

I'm the only one here that doesn't like Kyle. Wow! 

550, are you one of those people that think all police shootings are righteous but everyone else should have avoided needing to shoot\defend themselves?

Just now, F3600 said:

550, are you one of those people that think all police shootings are righteous but everyone else should have avoided needing to shoot\defend themselves?

NO, I just think that people are not holding Rittenhouse responsible for this nightmare.

He is only 17 years old.....a fukkin junior in High School.

He came from out of state.

He was carrying an unlicensed firearm.

He's a police WANNABE.

He was REJECTED from Marine recruiting. 

He lied about protecting the auto lot. 

He was looking for trouble.

He has stated in the past that he would shoot shop-lifters.  

32 minutes ago, Polaris 550 said:

Do you think Kyle is not responsible for anything here? 

I think he was in a situation he shouldn't have put himself in, but remembering back to that time, I was working in Idaho, and it was common for people guarding their communities from Antifa and BLM arriving out of Washington, most of the violent protesters were bussed in, along with a trailer containing stuff to cause harm, they were run off or they left on their own when they were outnumbered. The media is more to blame glamorizing and promoting the protests and it kept escalating, what Kyle did was eventually going to happen and I feel totally the blame is on the media. Kyle's big error is he was walking alone in such a volatile situation. The guys he shot deserved it for attacking him, I'm sure they didn't expect it, but they defiantly deserved it. After Grosskreutz's testimony he needs to be charged.

Edited November 10, 20213 yr by airflite1

I can't wait for this kid to "Pass Go and collect his $200 million" ... should he have not been there, sure.  That doesn't mean he doesn't have the right to defend himself. 

5 minutes ago, Bontz said:

I can't wait for this kid to "Pass Go and collect his $200 million" ... should he have not been there, sure.  That doesn't mean he doesn't have the right to defend himself. 

Rioters shouldn’t have been there 

7 minutes ago, Bontz said:

I can't wait for this kid to "Pass Go and collect his $200 million" ... should he have not been there, sure.  That doesn't mean he doesn't have the right to defend himself. 

Along with all the Rioters and Looters...

Edited November 10, 20213 yr by airflite1

6 minutes ago, ACE said:

Rioters shouldn’t have been there 

 

5 minutes ago, airflite1 said:

Along with all the Rioters and Looters...

 

Agree 100%

Last I checked he was on a public right of way, he has every right to be there and that's protected by the constitution