Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

STELLAR JOBS REPORT!!! UNEMPLOYMENT FALLS PRECIPITOUSLY!!!!


Recommended Posts

58 minutes ago, BOHICA said:

You will always have somebody knocking down the door if it pays really well.

Pay based on experience or no mention of pay still zero calls.  Only way to get guys now is to poch them from other crews . And you get a guy like that you already know his loyalty is shit 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With news on the disappointing April jobs report out of the way, the crew at CNS News did some digging and found some pretty fantastical, pre-jobs report headlines from mainstream media news outlets that were difficult to distinguish from an official White House press release. Here’s what they found:

Axios (5/3/21): “A Jobs report for the ages

Reuters (today, before the report was released): “U.S. economy likely created nearly a million jobs in April

CNBC (4/29/21): “April jobs expected to top 1 million as consumers boost the economy

MarketWatch (5/6/21): “A million new jobs? That’s how many Wall Street thinks the U.S. created in April

 

Barron’s (5/6/21): “Get Ready for a Blockbuster Jobs Report of 1 Million or More

New York Times (5/7/21): “Jobs Report Is Expected to Show a Big Gain: Live Updates

Bonus prediction:

NYT columnist Paul Krugman (5/6/21): “All indications are that we’re headed for the fastest year of growth since the ‘Morning in America’ boom of 1983-1984. What’s not to like?”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Snake said:

Jesus, here we fucking go again...

many-times-no-icegif.gif

 

Not Jimmy the sjw .

Jimmy the x prez you posted her pic . And you have to admit she is starting to look a bit like Eric Stolz character rocky in mask 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

South Carolina is opting out as well.

$387. That's how much the average American receives from their state in weekly unemployment payments, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, which rises to $687 with the federal boost.  Based on a 40-hour workweek, that means the average unemployed American is getting the equivalent of $17.17 an hour—more than twice the federal minimum wage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mainecat said:

If the government stopped spending on everything what would the job losses be?

Anyone of you Trump morons want to take a shot at this?

Dumb as fuck.  It’s the way idiots go when they are defending big government spending.  Just fucking stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Mainecat said:

If the government stopped spending on everything what would the job losses be?

Anyone of you Trump morons want to take a shot at this?

This is exactly why the government is able to spend so much.  Idiots like you believe shit like this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Mainecat said:

If the government stopped spending on everything what would the job losses be?

Anyone of you Trump morons want to take a shot at this?

Yes yes I do . I have wanted this for the past 30 yrs . It is not a if it will happen but when will it happen.  Best to do it with some controll of the situation as apposed to what is going to happen.  

He'll I would be happy it they just cut 1/2 he'll 1/4 would be a nice start.  But I get it when the car I'd heading for the cliff you got to send it in style 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Mainecat said:

If the government stopped spending on everything what would the job losses be?

Anyone of you Trump morons want to take a shot at this?

John Keynes thought government spending might be 6% with occasional spikes to 10% to ward off peaks and crashes in the economy. What are we at now 30+%? Care to take a stab at what we need the extra 20% for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Mainecat said:

If the government stopped spending on everything what would the job losses be?

Anyone of you Trump morons want to take a shot at this?

no question government spending would need to be weened back slowly.  It's how you know people have no economic knowledge when they say the government tomorrow should cut spending by 20-30-50%

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Angry ginger said:

no question government spending would need to be weened back slowly.  It's how you know people have no economic knowledge when they say the government tomorrow should cut spending by 20-30-50%

 

 

Wonder how these job numbers stack up against Dec. 2020, stock market numbers too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Angry ginger said:

no question government spending would need to be weened back slowly.  It's how you know people have no economic knowledge when they say the government tomorrow should cut spending by 20-30-50%

 

 

Why us it so hard to go back to spending levels of say 30 yrs ago ? Was the world still spinning then ?

What do you think is going to happen at the pace we are on ? 

Do you think this will just go on forever ? I see this ending only 1 way and then we will see how crazy cutting spending by 20 30 or 40% a decaded before would have been.

So yeah don't do it now when folks can absorb it make sure we just keep rolling forward till it all completely crashes and the China buys us for 2 cents on the dollar  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Ez ryder said:

Why us it so hard to go back to spending levels of say 30 yrs ago ? Was the world still spinning then ?

What do you think is going to happen at the pace we are on ? 

Do you think this will just go on forever ? I see this ending only 1 way and then we will see how crazy cutting spending by 20 30 or 40% a decaded before would have been.

So yeah don't do it now when folks can absorb it make sure we just keep rolling forward till it all completely crashes and the China buys us for 2 cents on the dollar  

you can't take that kind of money out of the economy in 1 swoop. you need to wean it out slowly or you collapse everything.   time to ween it is when the economy is otherwise booming,  you know like 2016 or so when Trump signed huge increases

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Angry ginger said:

you can't take that kind of money out of the economy in 1 swoop. you need to wean it out slowly or you collapse everything.   time to ween it is when the economy is otherwise booming,  you know like 2016 or so when Trump signed huge increases

Fuck that we have prob added well over 25% in just the last 2 yrs 

Edited by Ez ryder
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/7/2021 at 10:59 AM, Mag6240 said:

Nope, completely agree.  I just would have thought there was a better way than government handouts.

Government has been giving businesses handouts for 40 years in the form of debt instruments. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...