Zambroski Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 1 hour ago, 1jkw said: When you got nothing, post a meme. I got plenty. And you know that. I just lack the inclination to re-inform about economic history to those who have already made their mind up. Especially with someone that throws out information and incorrect correlations and facts that are so absurd I cannot even grasp what they are talking about. Go with god my man! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 LMAO at this thread.....oh those glorious Bush years! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtralettucetomatoe580 Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 9 minutes ago, Mainecat said: LMAO at this thread.....oh those glorious Bush years! Jesus, shut up MC. Eat your porridge and stay off the inter webs before you hurt yourself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 Dead and permanently disabled soldiers arriving daily from war zones, 4 dollar a gallon gasoline, 12% unemployment rates, bank failures....oh for those glory days! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 5 minutes ago, Mainecat said: Dead and permanently disabled soldiers arriving daily from war zones, 4 dollar a gallon gasoline, 12% unemployment rates, bank failures....oh for those glory days! What are you dribbling about now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtralettucetomatoe580 Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 16 minutes ago, Mainecat said: Dead and permanently disabled soldiers arriving daily from war zones, 4 dollar a gallon gasoline, 12% unemployment rates, bank failures....oh for those glory days! More died or were injured under Obama in Afghanistan... The war he could have stopped the day we walked into office. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted December 20, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 20, 2016 On 12/19/2016 at 7:12 AM, jtssrx said: Not one 1/4 in 8 years with plus 3 percent GDP growth. 8 years of QE money printing by the fed. Come on dude the economy isn't good or even fine as you claim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snoughnut Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 1 hour ago, Mainecat said: LMAO at this thread.....oh those glorious Bush years! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted December 20, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 20, 2016 14 hours ago, Mileage Psycho said: An honest post Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted December 20, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 20, 2016 42 minutes ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said: More died or were injured under Obama in Afghanistan... The war he could have stopped the day we walked into office. Ahhh....more intellectual dishonesty from the Department Manager 'Department Manager' You'll have to defend Dump at its gonna be fun to watch you wallow in your own feces Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 Ya but Trump is a businessman.....like Bush was. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 23 minutes ago, SnowRider said: Ahhh....more intellectual dishonesty from the Department Manager 'Department Manager' You'll have to defend Dump at its gonna be fun to watch you wallow in your own feces Wire to wire! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted December 20, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 20, 2016 1 minute ago, Sleepr2 said: 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted December 20, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 20, 2016 The Mouthbreathers are gut hooked by dishonest information again: The Uranium One deal was not Clinton's to veto or approve Among the ways these accusations stray from the facts is in attributing a power of veto or approval to Secretary Clinton that she simply did not have. Clinton was one of nine cabinet members and department heads that sit on the CFIUS, and the secretary of the treasury is its chairperson. CFIUS members are collectively charged with evaluating the transaction for potential national security issues, then turning their findings over to the president. By law, the committee can't veto a transaction; only the president can. According to The New York Times, Clinton may not have even directly participated in the Uranium One decision. Then-Assistant Secretary of State Jose Fernandez, whose job it was to represent the State Dept. on CFIUS, said Clinton herself "never intervened" in committee matters. http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 1 minute ago, SnowRider said: The Mouthbreathers are gut hooked by dishonest information again: The Uranium One deal was not Clinton's to veto or approve Among the ways these accusations stray from the facts is in attributing a power of veto or approval to Secretary Clinton that she simply did not have. Clinton was one of nine cabinet members and department heads that sit on the CFIUS, and the secretary of the treasury is its chairperson. CFIUS members are collectively charged with evaluating the transaction for potential national security issues, then turning their findings over to the president. By law, the committee can't veto a transaction; only the president can. According to The New York Times, Clinton may not have even directly participated in the Uranium One decision. Then-Assistant Secretary of State Jose Fernandez, whose job it was to represent the State Dept. on CFIUS, said Clinton herself "never intervened" in committee matters. http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/ Snopes ? So the Clintons did not get 2.5 Mill? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 43 minutes ago, Mainecat said: Hypocrite Quote 1. Get Democrats in the Congress and across the country to pledge to oppose Trump’s agenda. Prolong the process of approving choices, draw out hearings 2. March and demonstrate—in a coordinated, well-managed way. 3. Boycott all Trump products, real estate, hotels, resorts, everything. And then boycott all stores (like Nordstrom) that carry merchandise from Trump family brands. 6. Social media: What about a new YouTube channel devoted to video testimonials about resisting Trump’s First 100 Day Agenda? 8. Investigative journalism: We need investigative journalists to dig into the backgrounds of all of Trump’s appointees, in the White House, the Cabinet, Ambassadors and judges. 9. Lawsuits: Our version of “Drill, baby, drill” is “Sue, baby, sue.” Throw sand in the gears. 10. Is there a way to do a televised fundraiser with celebrities raising money for the Resistance? (Excerpt) Read more at robertreich.org ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 1 hour ago, Mainecat said: Dead and permanently disabled soldiers arriving daily from war zones, 4 dollar a gallon gasoline, 12% unemployment rates, bank failures....oh for those glory days! Diesel actually hit $5 here in 2007-2008. Peak oil man! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted December 20, 2016 Author Share Posted December 20, 2016 22 minutes ago, SnowRider said: The Mouthbreathers are gut hooked by dishonest information again: The Uranium One deal was not Clinton's to veto or approve Among the ways these accusations stray from the facts is in attributing a power of veto or approval to Secretary Clinton that she simply did not have. Clinton was one of nine cabinet members and department heads that sit on the CFIUS, and the secretary of the treasury is its chairperson. CFIUS members are collectively charged with evaluating the transaction for potential national security issues, then turning their findings over to the president. By law, the committee can't veto a transaction; only the president can. According to The New York Times, Clinton may not have even directly participated in the Uranium One decision. Then-Assistant Secretary of State Jose Fernandez, whose job it was to represent the State Dept. on CFIUS, said Clinton herself "never intervened" in committee matters. http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/ Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha snopes ha ha ha ha ha ha ha https://www.google.com/amp/amp.dailycaller.com/2016/06/17/fact-checking-snopes-websites-political-fact-checker-is-just-a-failed-liberal-blogger/ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry ginger Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 13 hours ago, 1jkw said: Bush bragged about homeownership being up under his admin, didn't change any rules when his party had control, had the fed. regulators done their jobs it never would have gotten so far out of hand. Even now after the collapse these dumb fucks want to loosen regulations on borrowing. as has every other administration. I will agree there should have been more regulation at the time but reality is things have gone too far the other way and it is stifling things to certain level. Both parties are to blame as are both the Clinton and Bush administrations for letting it get out of control like it did. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 39 minutes ago, SnowRider said: The Mouthbreathers are gut hooked by dishonest information again: The Uranium One deal was not Clinton's to veto or approve Among the ways these accusations stray from the facts is in attributing a power of veto or approval to Secretary Clinton that she simply did not have. Clinton was one of nine cabinet members and department heads that sit on the CFIUS, and the secretary of the treasury is its chairperson. CFIUS members are collectively charged with evaluating the transaction for potential national security issues, then turning their findings over to the president. By law, the committee can't veto a transaction; only the president can. According to The New York Times, Clinton may not have even directly participated in the Uranium One decision. Then-Assistant Secretary of State Jose Fernandez, whose job it was to represent the State Dept. on CFIUS, said Clinton herself "never intervened" in committee matters. http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/ Thats a big owned Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 8 minutes ago, Mainecat said: Thats a big owned So The Clintons did not get 2.5 Mill from the russians? You pathetic hypocrite. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gen4glock23 Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 5 minutes ago, Mainecat said: Thats a big owned Hello "Dick".. Seems you and GS both think your little sissified twat waffle groups will be able to sustain a real "jamming of the gears" with the sand intended to be thrown into them, 'eh? You'd both better first, find those that have the guts to do so, and not be costing mommy any time in the loony ward while trying to figure out how they were involved while being in her basement. And second, find something truthful to base all this snowflake first grader actions on, not just the same bullshit you two douchebags have been lapping up off the MSM's transgender peckers all of these years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gen4glock23 Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 4 minutes ago, Sleepr2 said: So The Clintons did not get 2.5 Mill from the russians? You pathetic hypocrite. The only "big" and "owned" those two (3 if you count rksdi) have ever known of is the ballsack riding across their own chins. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.