spin_dry Posted November 12, 2016 Share Posted November 12, 2016 mandated 6 weeks paid leave for mothers. paid by employers. i like this. sounds...umm...liberal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member BOHICA Posted November 12, 2016 Gold Member Share Posted November 12, 2016 I think fathers should be able to get this as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
02sled Posted November 12, 2016 Share Posted November 12, 2016 Nothing compared to what we have here which personally I think is over the top. 1 year parental leave where you collect Employment Insurance the same as if you lost your job and many large companies top up any short fall. Then they also give you the option for the year to be split up. For example the mother can be off for six months and the father can be off for six months. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bussman Posted November 12, 2016 Share Posted November 12, 2016 11 minutes ago, spin_dry said: mandated 6 weeks paid leave for mothers. paid by employers. i like this. sounds...umm...liberal It's a shame menopause came and went for you. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted November 12, 2016 Author Share Posted November 12, 2016 Just now, bussman said: It's a shame menopause came and went for you. T score is still hovering around 800. i think it's the kettle bell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted November 12, 2016 Share Posted November 12, 2016 14 minutes ago, 02sled said: Nothing compared to what we have here which personally I think is over the top. 1 year parental leave where you collect Employment Insurance the same as if you lost your job and many large companies top up any short fall. Then they also give you the option for the year to be split up. For example the mother can be off for six months and the father can be off for six months. Its OK for large corps, but hurts the smaller ones. Not sure what kind of homo wants to take time off when the kid is best with mom. Sure if she is the breadwinner but still, the kid needs mom at that age. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
02sled Posted November 12, 2016 Share Posted November 12, 2016 4 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: Its OK for large corps, but hurts the smaller ones. Not sure what kind of homo wants to take time off when the kid is best with mom. Sure if she is the breadwinner but still, the kid needs mom at that age. It's tough for any employer to have to hold a job open for a year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted November 12, 2016 Share Posted November 12, 2016 I think this is a good plan , it will discourage low wage employers from hiring woman though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted November 12, 2016 Share Posted November 12, 2016 4 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: Its OK for large corps, but hurts the smaller ones. Not sure what kind of homo wants to take time off when the kid is best with mom. Sure if she is the breadwinner but still, the kid needs mom at that age. "Libruls". My ass went back to work....she can do all that crap! It was her idea anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member BOHICA Posted November 12, 2016 Gold Member Share Posted November 12, 2016 1 minute ago, f7ben said: I think this is a good plan , it will discourage low wage employers from hiring woman though Especially one that shows up to an interview with a bun in the oven Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted November 12, 2016 Share Posted November 12, 2016 2 minutes ago, f7ben said: I think this is a good plan , it will discourage low wage employers from hiring woman though Yep. Women at child bearing years anyway. It is what it is though.....they can't have it all. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted November 12, 2016 Share Posted November 12, 2016 12 minutes ago, 02sled said: It's tough for any employer to have to hold a job open for a year. Ok, then let me restate it then. Even a large corp can feel the pain if the team that provides the service is say 5 or less and loses a key person for a year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted November 12, 2016 Share Posted November 12, 2016 32 minutes ago, Zambroski said: "Libruls". My ass went back to work....she can do all that crap! It was her idea anyway. My wife complained she had to go back to work part time due to all my traveling. Shit when we got married, we only took a 4 day honeymoon and I was back to a job I had in Ohio. Came home on a Thursday, got my tux on Friday, married on Saturday and gone back on Tuesday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted November 12, 2016 Share Posted November 12, 2016 1 hour ago, f7ben said: I think this is a good plan , it will discourage low wage employers from hiring woman though It falls under short term disability and many women get more than 6 weeks. And that's why women get passed over for key positions.... Motherhood... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted November 12, 2016 Share Posted November 12, 2016 2 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said: Its OK for large corps, but hurts the smaller ones. Not sure what kind of homo wants to take time off when the kid is best with mom. Sure if she is the breadwinner but still, the kid needs mom at that age. It has nothing to do with a Women working or not A father can oped to stay at home (wife there or not) for 6 months and get to know their child. Nothing wrong with that. You are married to your work and that is okay too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted November 12, 2016 Share Posted November 12, 2016 2 hours ago, f7ben said: I think this is a good plan , it will discourage low wage employers from hiring woman though ? why? what about hiring a Women that is already done having kids, many are done before they hit 30 years old. 1950 is over time to move forward. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted November 12, 2016 Share Posted November 12, 2016 2 hours ago, BOHICA said: I think fathers should be able to get this as well. well can I get it when I get a new puppy ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted November 12, 2016 Share Posted November 12, 2016 4 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: ? why? what about hiring a Women that is already done having kids, many are done before they hit 30 years old. 1950 is over time to move forward. My god ....you are one dumb motherfucker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted November 12, 2016 Share Posted November 12, 2016 1 minute ago, f7ben said: My god ....you are one dumb motherfucker if you say so, but how about explain how this stops hiring a women that isn't having anymore kids or have them at all. You wonder why the WHITE population is dwindlng? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 16 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: It has nothing to do with a Women working or not A father can oped to stay at home (wife there or not) for 6 months and get to know their child. Nothing wrong with that. You are married to your work and that is okay too I would really get to know my new goldfish to will u pay me to stay home and also pay the person covering my job? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 1 minute ago, Ez ryder said: I would really get to know my new goldfish to will u pay me to stay home and also pay the person covering my job? In Canada it costs the workplace nothing - and if you can compare a child to a goldfish then in your case yes. What is being proposed in USA isn't helping anyone, I agree there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 8 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: if you say so, but how about explain how this stops hiring a women that isn't having anymore kids or have them at all. You wonder why the WHITE population is dwindlng? You accused me of making sweeping antiquated sexist generalizations while you were making sweeping antiquated sexist generalizations you fucking idiot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 1 minute ago, 1trailmaker said: In Canada it costs the workplace nothing - and if you can compare a child to a goldfish then in your case yes. What is being proposed in USA isn't helping anyone, I agree there More BULLFUCKINGSHIT from WRONG AGAIN FAIL, some things never change Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 1 minute ago, f7ben said: You accused me of making sweeping antiquated sexist generalizations while you were making sweeping antiquated sexist generalizations you fucking idiot if you say so Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 Just now, Momorider said: More BULLFUCKINGSHIT from WRONG AGAIN FAIL, some things never change care to explain or are you just going to post your typical useless post Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.