Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

China shuts all 16 temporary coronavirus hospitals in Wuhan


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Jimmy Snacks said:

Playing devils advocate but should we believe the Chinese? 

 No. Not for a second. They are still covering up the source and spread of this virus. We will never get the truth from China. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, washedupmxer said:

So if we are making these dire predictions and hospitals are already full why aren't we already building temp overflow like China did? 

Because trump?

8b wasn't enough?

Anyone? 

From the link, do the math for deaths vs case and you have a 4.8% rate of fatality, blows the flu away :news:

Almost 50,000 coronavirus cases have been reported in Wuhan, with 2,423 deaths.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
Just now, washedupmxer said:

Its not just them saying it. 

Playing devil's advocate should we believe our news? 

 

I believe our news more than the Chinese Government.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AKIQPilot said:

 No. Not for a second. They are still covering up the source and spread of this virus. We will never get the truth from China. 

Where did you see this? 

The source has been confirmed 100% as from an animal I thought? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mileage Psycho said:

From the link, do the math for deaths vs case and you have a 4.8% rate of fatality, blows the flu away :news:

Almost 50,000 coronavirus cases have been reported in Wuhan, with 2,423 deaths.

What does that have to do with anything we're talking about here? :lol:

and yes those numbers could be accurate for people over 80

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, washedupmxer said:

What does that have to do with anything we're talking about here? :lol:

and yes those numbers could be accurate for people over 80

Listen I know your not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but the article doesn't mention age but overall numbers 4.8% meathead.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said:

4,8% fatality rate, I hope they are not lying about that.

Is it possible that some of the cases are unreported or under reported? Maybe they’re lying, maybe not. The stats may not be accurate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NaturallyAspirated said:

That kinda works both ways, less reported cases, and less reported deaths due to the disease.

Neal

Absolutely. We just don’t know for sure right now. I wouldn’t hang my hat on any of these numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, washedupmxer said:

Anyone?

 

$

We are far to preoccupied as to who would pay.

We (the US) also have far better existing overflow facilities that can be used.  Schools, ANG sites and temporary tent facilities, ect. for temporary hospitals.  We (government) should be planning to use these facilities, having an operation order, ect.  It would be nice to know some of the details in advance (now), a good leadership would have this information for disbursement.

Neal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NaturallyAspirated said:

$

We are far to preoccupied as to who would pay.

We (the US) also have far better existing overflow facilities that can be used.  Schools, ANG sites and temporary tent facilities, ect. for temporary hospitals.  We (government) should be planning to use these facilities, having an operation order, ect.  It would be nice to know some of the details in advance (now), a good leadership would have this information for disbursement.

Neal

last report I saw said most of the CDC didn't even know what they were going to do with all the money that they had for this

8 billion 

I haven't seen one tent or temporary hospital yet 

Yet all kinds of predictions if over full hospitals

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said:

Listen I know your not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but the article doesn't mention age but overall numbers 4.8% meathead.

 

2 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said:

They are the best information we have at present.  

Neal

Well Vin is selling it like they’re hard facts. And calling people names that disagree. I think that’s a bit premature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So let's conclude here we have 8 billion dollars to use and we're not going to build any temporary facilities even though everybody's predicting a mass outbreak that's going to spread like wildfire and our hospitals are going to be over full

Well that makes really good sense lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...